Seems appropriate.

[mark francis]

Not how the legal system works
God you are stupid lol

Bent courts will judge unjustly, and the fact that American courts do evil is not a justification of what they are doing.

 

[pjmret]

The evidence of fraud is sufficient proof of fraud as long as it cannot be refuted.

nope.
not how common sense and our legal system works.
god you are stupid lol

 

[pjmret]

Bent courts will judge unjustly, and the fact that American courts do evil is not a justification of what they are doing.

prove courts are bent, lying moooron. lol
but you wont
god you are stupid.

 

[mark francis]

prove courts are bent, lying moooron. lol
but you wont
god you are stupid.

You claim democrat courts are not corrupt yet you prove nothing. I claim some some or many democrat courts are corrupted but will follow your lead and also offer no proof.

 

[pjmret]

You claim democrat courts are not corrupt yet you prove nothing. I claim some some or many democrat courts are corrupted but will follow your lead and also offer no proof.

i dont have to prove anything. i didn't make the claims, mooron lol
i'm not the legal moooron making stupid claims and then cowardly running away like the anti american hater you are

 

[mark francis]

i dont have to prove anything. i didn't make the claims, mooron lol
i'm not the legal moooron making stupid claims and then cowardly running away like the anti american hater you are

Democrats cannot disprove evidence of corruption they deny even though the evidence contradicts their self-serving denials.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats cannot disprove evidence of corruption they deny even though the evidence contradicts their self-serving denials.

God you make dumb right wing posts lol

 

[Boris Norris]

The evidence of fraud is sufficient proof of fraud as long as it cannot be refuted.

But there is no evidence and you've had 4 years to produce it.

It's the same old bitter hate filled crap you've been belching since Trump lost.
There was no fraud and you can't prove there was. Youre a silly bitter old man. Between your god and Trump being beaten has send you off your head.
Get yourself some meds before the election. It's gonna be harder then.

 

[mark francis]

But there is no evidence and you've had 4 years to produce it.

Democrats lie when they claim courts proved in just two months following the 2020 election that all claims of voting fraud were false. Astoundingly, democrats never proved any evidence of voting fraud was false. Just examine all the cases still in court that were never resolved from 2020 until now.

Real voting fraud cases begin to inundate courts years later. This case in GA, for example, was taken up by Brad Raffensperger, probably the single most responsible person in Georgia for botching voting fraud investigations.

https://katv.com/news/nation-world/georgia-opens-investigation-into-ballot-harvesting-claims 1-5-22

Georgia opens investigation into ballot harvesting claims

WASHINGTON (TND) — Amid claims of ballot harvesting, Georgia has opened an investigation into the state's 2020 general election and subsequent U.S. Senate runoff.

Under Georgia law, it is illegal for any third party to pick up and drop off ballots for voters, also known as ballot harvesting. According to reports, at least 242 people made over 5,000 ballot drop-offs during the Georgia Senate runoff elections.

“Credible evidence was given to us that people were harvesting ballots,” said Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to The National Desk’s Jan Jeffcoat. “This information was provided to us and they said there's a witness, a 'John Doe.' And so we're looking at subpoenaing that person to get the information.”

Here we see Raffensperger opening an investigation into evidence of voter fraud he deems credible, fully a year after Democrats falsely announded thaty courts had proven all voting fraud claims were invalid.

But that is not the end. Raffensperger slandered President Trump for suggesting to him that he should be able to find at least 12,000 invalid ballots among the hundreds of thousands the evidence suggests were illegitimately cast. So how will this investigation damage Raffensperger's reputation if the investigation reveals that the state covered up election fraud? Don't worry, that is not going to happen on Raffensperger's watch. He has the election board examine the evidence against them and, lo and behold!, the election board finds themselves innocent of any wrongdoing. Isn't it amazing how democracy works like that?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...board-dismisses-ballot-harvesting-complaints/ 5-17-22

Georgia elections board dismisses allegations of ballot harvesting

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

https://sos.ga.gov/news/state-elect...ballot-suitcase-investigation-report-finds-no 6-20-23

State Election Board Clears Fulton County “Ballot Suitcase” Investigation; Report Finds No Evidence of Conspiracy, No Fraud

 

[pjmret]

Democrats lie when they claim courts proved in just two months following the 2020 election that all claims of voting fraud were false. Astoundingly, democrats never proved any evidence of voting fraud was false. Just examine all the cases still in court that were never resolved from 2020 until now.

Real voting fraud cases begin to inundate courts years later. This case in GA, for example, was taken up by Brad Raffensperger, probably the single most responsible person in Georgia for botching voting fraud investigations.

https://katv.com/news/nation-world/georgia-opens-investigation-into-ballot-harvesting-claims 1-5-22

Georgia opens investigation into ballot harvesting claims

WASHINGTON (TND) — Amid claims of ballot harvesting, Georgia has opened an investigation into the state's 2020 general election and subsequent U.S. Senate runoff.

Under Georgia law, it is illegal for any third party to pick up and drop off ballots for voters, also known as ballot harvesting. According to reports, at least 242 people made over 5,000 ballot drop-offs during the Georgia Senate runoff elections.

“Credible evidence was given to us that people were harvesting ballots,” said Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to The National Desk’s Jan Jeffcoat. “This information was provided to us and they said there's a witness, a 'John Doe.' And so we're looking at subpoenaing that person to get the information.”

Here we see Raffensperger opening an investigation into evidence of voter fraud he deems credible, fully a year after Democrats falsely announded thaty courts had proven all voting fraud claims were invalid.

But that is not the end. Raffensperger slandered President Trump for suggesting to him that he should be able to find at least 12,000 invalid ballots among the hundreds of thousands the evidence suggests were illegitimately cast. So how will this investigation damage Raffensperger's reputation if the investigation reveals that the state covered up election fraud? Don't worry, that is not going to happen on Raffensperger's watch. He has the election board examine the evidence against them and, lo and behold!, the election board finds themselves innocent of any wrongdoing. Isn't it amazing how democracy works like that?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...board-dismisses-ballot-harvesting-complaints/ 5-17-22

Georgia elections board dismisses allegations of ballot harvesting

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

https://sos.ga.gov/news/state-elect...ballot-suitcase-investigation-report-finds-no 6-20-23

State Election Board Clears Fulton County “Ballot Suitcase” Investigation; Report Finds No Evidence of Conspiracy, No Fraud

It's amusing that you keep posting about fraud evidence in courts given that you idiots lost every court case because your evidence was so stupid but apparently you are so stupid you want to keep bringing app courts and how you idiots lost every time LOL

 

[mark francis]

It's amusing that you keep posting about fraud evidence in courts given that you idiots lost every court case because your evidence was so stupid but apparently you are so stupid you want to keep bringing app courts and how you idiots lost every time LOL

Yes, 'we' lost every court case prior to Jan 6, 2021, long before serious investigations had uncovered serious willful election violations which then found their way into courts that could not dismiss them for technical reasons.

Many voting fraud cases from 2020 are still waiting to be heard in courts. This research, for example, was just concluded this year:

Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump ‘Almost Certainly’ Won in 2020 | The Epoch Times 2-9-24

Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump ‘Almost Certainly’ Won in 2020
A new study of mail-in ballot fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 presidential election.

Empty envelopes of opened vote-by-mail ballots for the presidential primary are stacked on a table at King County Elections in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)
By Tom Ozimek
2/9/2024

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots had in the 2020 election concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of voting by mail.

 

[pjmret]

Yes, 'we' lost every court case prior to Jan 6, 2021, long before serious investigations had uncovered serious willful election violations which then found their way into courts that could not dismiss them for technical reasons.

Many voting fraud cases from 2020 are still waiting to be heard in courts. This research, for example, was just concluded this year:

Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump ‘Almost Certainly’ Won in 2020 | The Epoch Times 2-9-24

Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump ‘Almost Certainly’ Won in 2020
A new study of mail-in ballot fraud challenges the official results of the 2020 presidential election.

Empty envelopes of opened vote-by-mail ballots for the presidential primary are stacked on a table at King County Elections in Renton, Wash., on March 10, 2020. (Jason Redmond/AFP via Getty Images)
By Tom Ozimek
2/9/2024

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots had in the 2020 election concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of voting by mail.

You've lost every court case that you guys brought claiming fraud it has nothing to do with the date you've had the last 4 years to bring court cases claiming fraud and yet you idiots have not won a single court case the clear conclusion is that you are idiots with stupid non evidence LOL

 

[mark francis]

You've lost every court case that you guys brought claiming fraud it has nothing to do with the date you've had the last 4 years to bring court cases claiming fraud and yet you idiots have not won a single court case the clear conclusion is that you are idiots with stupid non evidence LOL

Courts that rejected the cases you claim were lost did not disprove the mountain of 2020 evidence of voting fraud.

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats lie when they claim courts proved in just two months following the 2020 election that all claims of voting fraud were false. Astoundingly, democrats never proved any evidence of voting fraud was false. Just examine all the cases still in court that were never resolved from 2020 until now.

Real voting fraud cases begin to inundate courts years later. This case in GA, for example, was taken up by Brad Raffensperger, probably the single most responsible person in Georgia for botching voting fraud investigations.

https://katv.com/news/nation-world/georgia-opens-investigation-into-ballot-harvesting-claims 1-5-22

Georgia opens investigation into ballot harvesting claims

WASHINGTON (TND) — Amid claims of ballot harvesting, Georgia has opened an investigation into the state's 2020 general election and subsequent U.S. Senate runoff.

Under Georgia law, it is illegal for any third party to pick up and drop off ballots for voters, also known as ballot harvesting. According to reports, at least 242 people made over 5,000 ballot drop-offs during the Georgia Senate runoff elections.

“Credible evidence was given to us that people were harvesting ballots,” said Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to The National Desk’s Jan Jeffcoat. “This information was provided to us and they said there's a witness, a 'John Doe.' And so we're looking at subpoenaing that person to get the information.”

Here we see Raffensperger opening an investigation into evidence of voter fraud he deems credible, fully a year after Democrats falsely announded thaty courts had proven all voting fraud claims were invalid.

But that is not the end. Raffensperger slandered President Trump for suggesting to him that he should be able to find at least 12,000 invalid ballots among the hundreds of thousands the evidence suggests were illegitimately cast. So how will this investigation damage Raffensperger's reputation if the investigation reveals that the state covered up election fraud? Don't worry, that is not going to happen on Raffensperger's watch. He has the election board examine the evidence against them and, lo and behold!, the election board finds themselves innocent of any wrongdoing. Isn't it amazing how democracy works like that?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...board-dismisses-ballot-harvesting-complaints/ 5-17-22

Georgia elections board dismisses allegations of ballot harvesting

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

https://sos.ga.gov/news/state-elect...ballot-suitcase-investigation-report-finds-no 6-20-23

State Election Board Clears Fulton County “Ballot Suitcase” Investigation; Report Finds No Evidence of Conspiracy, No Fraud

Sorry son.
We won democratically and you'll have to live with it.

 

[mark francis]

Sorry son.
We won democratically and you'll have to live with it.

Soros-backed anti-American leftists did succeed in stealing the 2020 election for thieves and thugs. With corrupt politicians the power of politics is all about distributions of federal dollars, federal jobs, federal contracts, federal grants, and federal benefits to their supporters. That fact has never changed in the US in hundreds of years.

The Story of Tom Pendergast — KC Yesterday

In Kansas City's rich history, one figure stands out as a larger-than-life character who left an indelible mark on the city and its politics. This is the captivating story of Tom Pendergast, a man who held immense power and controlled Kansas City and Jackson County from 1925 to 1939. From his humble

kcyesterday.com

In the rich history of Kansas City, one figure stands out as a larger-than-life character who left a permanent mark on the city and its politics: Tom Pendergast.

His story is one of immense power, control, and controversy, shaping Kansas City and Jackson County from 1925 to 1939. ...

Under Pendergast's astute leadership, the Jackson County Democratic Club became a formidable force in Kansas City politics. Pendergast found it more effective to wield his influence as an unelected official, using his vast network of Irish family members and friends to manipulate elections, often through questionable means such as voter fraud.

His control extended beyond the ballot box as he distributed government contracts and patronage jobs, ensuring loyalty and consolidating his power within the city.

Pendergast's diverse portfolio included stakes in utility companies, real estate, and even local newspapers. His political clout helped him secure numerous city project bids for construction and development contracts. Notable projects included the Municipal Auditorium, City Hall, and the paving of Brush Creek.

By owning multiple concrete companies, Pendergast ensured that city projects would almost guarantee business for his firms, further enriching his coffers and reinforcing his control. ...

Tom Pendergast's life was a mosaic of power, corruption, and public service. His political machine, intertwined with the mafia and fueled by the era of Prohibition, left an undeniable imprint on Kansas City.