Seems appropriate.

mark francis said:
No need. Democrats oppose voting security measures that could limit the opportunities for fraud and democrats do not support investigations into voting fraud, proving they do not want any evidence of fraud uncovered. Democrat actions prove they are not opposed to voting fraud but are opposed to uncovering voting fraud.
Click to expand...
Yes no need to prove your claim if you want to prove you are a lying moooron lol
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Courts that ruled no voter fraud occurred in 2020 were out of bounds because nobody in or out of courts has ever proven massive democrat voting fraud did not occur.
Click to expand...
Has anyone ever proven trumps win in 2016 was not fraudulent? There is this lunatic poster here who incessantly claims us elections cannot be trusted.
 
Gabriel_Bell said:
Mark needs to hop on a plane and fly to China and order Xi to allow Chinese people to pray to his favorite deity.
There are a lot of functioning Christian churches in the PC. Mark is an ignoramus.
Click to expand...
I've known of some great Christian missionaries to China and one couple was once involved in our church and school as teachers and members.
 
Randomguy said:
Has anyone ever proven trumps win in 2016 was not fraudulent? There is this lunatic poster here who incessantly claims us elections cannot be trusted.
Click to expand...
Democrats had just as much freedom to investigate the 2016 election as they did the 2020 election, although there were few signs that democrats investigated anything in either election, except to root out and jail those who did attempt to conduct voting fraud investigations.
 
mark francis said:
Democrats had just as much freedom to investigate the 2016 election as they did the 2020 election, although there were few signs that democrats investigated anything in either election, except to root out and jail those who did attempt to conduct voting fraud investigations.
Click to expand...
No one was jailed who did not commit a crime there were plenty of investigations God you are stupid
 
pjmret said:
No one was jailed who did not commit a crime there were plenty of investigations God you are stupid
Click to expand...
More than one responsible American investigator was criminally charged by democrat obstructionists for attempting to gain access to voting machines the democrats have declared are off-limits to voting fraud investigators.




Pro-Trump lawyer charged in conspiracy to seize Michigan voting machines after 2020 election​


Matthew DePerno, the failed GOP candidate for Michigan attorney general, and former GOP state Rep. Daire Rendon were both arraigned Tuesday on multiple charges related to unlawful possession of voting machines and conspiracy to access voting machines in the state. Both pleaded not guilty.

Did Congress pass a law outlawing examinations of voting machines? No. Did republicans poass a law outlawing examinations of voting machines? No. Have democrats jailed examiners for attempting to examine voting machines the democrats have claimed have been forbidden by law to be examined? Yes. Why have democrats declared the machines void of corruption and refused to allow their examinations for evidence of fraud? In two words, Voting Fraud!
 
mark francis said:
More than one responsible American investigator was criminally charged by democrat obstructionists for attempting to gain access to voting machines the democrats have declared are off-limits to voting fraud investigators.




Pro-Trump lawyer charged in conspiracy to seize Michigan voting machines after 2020 election​


Matthew DePerno, the failed GOP candidate for Michigan attorney general, and former GOP state Rep. Daire Rendon were both arraigned Tuesday on multiple charges related to unlawful possession of voting machines and conspiracy to access voting machines in the state. Both pleaded not guilty.

Did Congress pass a law outlawing examinations of voting machines? No. Did republicans poass a law outlawing examinations of voting machines? No. Have democrats jailed examiners for attempting to examine voting machines the democrats have claimed have been forbidden by law to be examined? Yes. Why have democrats declared the machines void of corruption and refused to allow their examinations for evidence of fraud? In two words, Voting Fraud!
Click to expand...

yes, there are laws about access to machines, for obvious reasons. duh.
you can't just get access to voting machines because your feelings are hurt.
duh.
god you are beyond stupid. lol
 
Werbung:
mark francis said:
Who cares whether their refusal to conduct or support forensic examinations of voting machines is because it "is not their job." They resist examinations of voting machines because they fear evidence from examinations will prove the machines were corrupted in the 2020 theft of the US election.
Click to expand...
They didn't resist examinations and you cannot prove Democrat hierarchy interfered in any way. What judges did is not democrat policy. It's the fucking law.
 

Similar threads

dogtowner
Addicted dems troubling to DNC
Replies
4
Views
1K
Old_Trapper70
Old_Trapper70
Dr.Who
A glimmer of hope
Replies
8
Views
2K
BigRob
BigRob
Bob the Builder
California's biggest stimulus job!
Replies
2
Views
938
Pandora
Pandora
vyo476
Nucear Terrorism
2 3
Replies
32
Views
4K
vyo476
vyo476
M
Extravagant waste of government funds on personal expenses is normal for democrat officials
2 3
Replies
37
Views
563
pjmret
P
Back
Top