Seize the Center...

Gipper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
6,106
Location
Somewhere Nice
This from the Great Thomas Sowell...

Some 'experts' learn the wrong lessons of history

Talk show host Michael Medved, for example, apparently thinks the Republicans need a centrist presidential candidate in 2012. He said, "Most political battles are won by seizing the center."

Moreover, he added: "Anyone who believes otherwise ignores the electoral experience of the last 50 years."

But just when did Ronald Reagan, with his two landslide election victories, "seize the center"? For that matter, when did Franklin D. Roosevelt, with a record four consecutive presidential election victories, "seize the center"?

There have been a long string of Republican presidential candidates who seized the center -- and lost elections. Thomas E. Dewey, for example, seized the center against Harry Truman in 1948.

Even though Truman was so unpopular at the outset that the New Republic magazine urged him not to run, and polls consistently had Dewey ahead, Truman clearly stood for something -- and for months he battled for what he stood for.

That turned out to be enough to beat Dewey, who simply stood in the center.

It is very doubtful that most of the people who voted for Truman agreed with him on all the things he stood for. But they knew he stood for something, and they agreed with enough of it to put him back in the White House.

It is equally doubtful that most of the people who voted for Reagan in his two landslide victories agreed with all his positions. But they agreed with enough of them to put him in the White House to replace Jimmy Carter, who stood in the center, even if it was only a center of confusion.

Gerald Ford, after narrowly beating off a rare challenge by Reagan to a sitting president of his own party, seized the center in the general election, and lost to an initially almost totally unknown governor from Georgia.

George H.W. Bush, after initially winning election by coming across as another Reagan with his "Read my lips, no new taxes" speech, turned "kinder and gentler" -- to everyone except the taxpayers -- once he was in office. In other ways as well, he seized the center. And lost to another unknown governor.

More recently, we have seen two more Republican candidates who seized the center -- Sens. Bob Dole in 1996 and John McCain in 2008 -- go down to defeat, McCain at the hands of a man that most people had never even heard of just three years earlier.

Candidates should certainly reach out to a broad electorate. But the question is whether they reach out by promoting their own principles to others or by trying to be all things to all people.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washington*************/opin...n-wrong-lessons-history/1958291#ixzz1fD4Cjhp9


This crap that the Rs (notice how it is always the Rs that MUST seize the center...but it never applies to the Ds) must nominate a centrist candidate to win, is maddening. And Dr. Sowell proves it is a foolish theory that fails to understand history.
 
Werbung:
This from the Great Thomas Sowell...




This crap that the Rs (notice how it is always the Rs that MUST seize the center...but it never applies to the Ds) must nominate a centrist candidate to win, is maddening. And Dr. Sowell proves it is a foolish theory that fails to understand history.

That was well written, I would like to see a candidate who actually stands for something, has back bone and wont put up with crap from the left and so far ... newt is the closest but I dont like him so this time around is gonna suck for me again unless someone new comes around.
 
Werbung:
This from the Great Thomas Sowell...




This crap that the Rs (notice how it is always the Rs that MUST seize the center...but it never applies to the Ds) must nominate a centrist candidate to win, is maddening. And Dr. Sowell proves it is a foolish theory that fails to understand history.

In the present pub elections those not in the center have support for just that reason. Romney on the other hand has support because the MSM keeps telling everyone that it is him they should support - since when should we trust the MSM? If Romney wins it is a half win for the dems but if Newt or Cain were to win then it is a loss for the dems.
 
Back
Top