Should our government give supreme court powers over the president?

Werbung:
Why does the right keep insisting on this myth that America is broke? Why does the right continue this rant about fiscal disaster? "If a family were in this shape they would be in bankruptcy Court." Bull!

Show me a family with a million dollar house, a quarter million dollar income, and a $100,000 mortgage who is in bankruptcy court. Then we'll talk.
 
Why does the right keep insisting on this myth that America is broke? Why does the right continue this rant about fiscal disaster? "If a family were in this shape they would be in bankruptcy Court." Bull!

Show me a family with a million dollar house, a quarter million dollar income, and a $100,000 mortgage who is in bankruptcy court. Then we'll talk.

I hope you're right.

Speaking of right, aren't they the ones saying that the US is the greatest nation on Earth? Surely, we can solve this little problem, if we're the greatest nation on Earth.

All it would take is for us to begin to pull together. It worked in WWII and the great depression, and that was a much bigger crisis than we have now.
But let's not minimize it. Our debt equals our GDP. It's like a family with credit card debt that equals its annual income. It is a problem that has to be addressed. So far, the only thing coming from Washington is unrealistic, simplistic and unworkable partisan nonsense.
 
Our debt equals our GDP. It's like a family with credit card debt that equals its annual income.
A very apt analogy... If history is any guide, the politicians will simply kick the can of fiscal insolvency down the road for future generations to deal with. Meanwhile the can gets larger the farther down the road it goes and, will eventually, become to large to kick any further. Talk about leaving someone else holding the tab... :(

So far, the only thing coming from Washington is unrealistic, simplistic and unworkable partisan nonsense.
Along with the occasional non-partisan, simplistic, unrealistic and unworkable nonsense:

All it would take is for us to begin to pull together.
:)
 
Why does the right keep insisting on this myth that America is broke? Why does the right continue this rant about fiscal disaster? "If a family were in this shape they would be in bankruptcy Court." Bull!

Show me a family with a million dollar house, a quarter million dollar income, and a $100,000 mortgage who is in bankruptcy court. Then we'll talk.

Don't look behind the curtain. There is nothing to see behind the curtain. :D

Oh, by the way, I'll cite just ONE small group of people who make millions of dollars and often squander it away until they end up in bankruptcy court.........PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES.

Your simplistic viewpoints are laughable at best. But the vast majority of leftists are simple-minded people who can only gain and retain power by manipulating and exploiting BASIC HUMAN EMOTIONS.
 
Why does the right keep insisting on this myth that America is broke?
Denial is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.
 
Denial is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.

It is even worse than denial. Not only do they NOT believe there is a big problem, but they think we can get out of this predicament easily. We just need to raise taxes on the wealthy.

At all costs, the welfare state must be protected and expanded. Cuts in entitlements are completely unacceptable.

From a WSJ editorial today...
The entitlement state can't be reformed by one house of Congress in one year against a determined President and Senate held by the other party. It requires more than one election. The Obama Democrats have staged a spending blowout to 24% of GDP and rising, and now they want to find a way to finance it to make it permanent. Those are the real stakes of 2012.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303678704576442231815463502.html?mod=WSJ_hp_mostpop_read
 
It is even worse than denial. Not only do they NOT believe there is a big problem, but they think we can get out of this predicament easily. We just need to raise taxes on the wealthy.

At all costs, the welfare state must be protected and expanded. Cuts in entitlements are completely unacceptable.

From a WSJ editorial today...

Right. Two wars, the gift to pharma named Medicare Part D, and huge tax cuts with no efforts what so ever to rein in spending had nothing to do with the problem. Its all Obama's fault.

Sure.

By the way, who owns the Wall Street Journal now? Rudolf Murdoch you say? Ah yes, Rupert Murdoch. Wall Street Journal wouldn't be one-sided, would they? Not with Rupert Murdoch in charge. Of course not.
 
Right. Two wars, the gift to pharma named Medicare Part D, and huge tax cuts with no efforts what so ever to rein in spending had nothing to do with the problem. Its all Obama's fault.

Denial: projection - admit both the fact and seriousness but deny responsibility.

By the way, who owns the Wall Street Journal now? Rudolf Murdoch you say? Ah yes, Rupert Murdoch. Wall Street Journal wouldn't be one-sided, would they? Not with Rupert Murdoch in charge. Of course not.
  • Red Herring: an argument, given in response to another argument, which does not address the original issue.
  • Ad hominem: attacking the arguer instead of the argument.
  • Appeal to motive: where a premise is dismissed by calling into question the motives of its proposer
 
Denial: projection - admit both the fact and seriousness but deny responsibility.


  • Red Herring: an argument, given in response to another argument, which does not address the original issue.
  • Ad hominem: attacking the arguer instead of the argument.
  • Appeal to motive: where a premise is dismissed by calling into question the motives of its proposer

What does any of that garble have to do with the fact of where the immense spending problem came from? Are you pretending two wars, Medicare Part D and tax cuts without spending cuts didn't cost us several trillions of debt? Are you pretending that didn't actually happen?
 
Right. Two wars, the gift to pharma named Medicare Part D, and huge tax cuts with no efforts what so ever to rein in spending had nothing to do with the problem. Its all Obama's fault.

Sure.

By the way, who owns the Wall Street Journal now? Rudolf Murdoch you say? Ah yes, Rupert Murdoch. Wall Street Journal wouldn't be one-sided, would they? Not with Rupert Murdoch in charge. Of course not.

Does your HYPOCRISY have any "dimensions", or does it just go on for infinity. Just curious.
 
Should our government give supreme court powers over the president?
Aren't they gonna have to clear that....


.....first????

323.png
 
Werbung:
Back
Top