It was a fair Election Franken won, suck it up crybaby..and no I did not vote for him...But facts are facts. Norm lost. And the he gets high approval from the state. Just like Klobuchar does, who is also very liberal...you know how close the Republican was? no one does...When it was near Election time I did not even know who was running against her, thats how low in the polls he was.
There was no voter Fraud, right wing twits just like to cry it all the time, and then when called on it, provide no evidence.
Fair election, you say? Tell me .. how many votes did Franken supposedly win by (you know, after the multiple court challenges)?
That's right ... 312.
On the morning after the election, after 2.9 million people had voted, Coleman led Franken by 725 votes.
Franken and his Democratic allies dispatched an army of lawyers to challenge the results. After the first canvass, Coleman’s lead was down to 206 votes. That was followed by months of wrangling and litigation. In the end, Franken was declared the winner by 312 votes. He was sworn into office in July 2009, eight months after the election.
Keep that number in mind - 312.
Now, how many ex-convicts, who are ineligible to vote in Minnesota, have been found to have voted?? And, when they did, knowing their relative place in society, isn't it logical to assume that most, of not all, voted Democrat, because they wanted the free handouts?? Think that's a reasonable conclusion?
Oh yeah .. let's see --- Franken wins by 312 ....
1,009 convicts cast illegal votes. As of August 2012 (I haven't followed this travesty against our Constitution any further) .. anyway, as of August 2012, 177 people (only 3 of those convicts) were charged and found guilty of voter fraud - oh, in case you haven't figured it out, all were Democrats. By the way, at that time, there were an additional 66 awaiting trial.
So, we have 243 people charged/convicted of voter fraud - amazingly, all Democrats. Then, we have an additional 1,074 illegal votes cast by a traditionally heavy Democratic demographic.
Let's do the math .... 312 votes won, 243 found guilty - that leaves 61 votes ... which, in turn, means the convicts only had to vote a 568-507 Dem split to steal the election. Think that is feasible?
Now, I can already hear you saying that I can't prove that the convicts didn't vote Republican - and you're right, I can't. But, then, maybe you can explain why Republicans have repeatedly asked for an investigation, and it has been blocked by the Democrats using every legal and parliamentary trick in the book.
How are they doing that, you ask? Easy --- Minnesota law says that two conditions have to have been met in order to charge voter fraud --- 1) they must have cast a vote, and 2) they have to have KNOWINGLY committed fraud. You know that last is virtually impossible to prove if the individual doesn't confess. So, the governor - a Democrat - has, surprise, surprise, directed his Attorney General not to investigate the 1,074 illegal votes from the convicts. After all, they would only have to prosecute 122 cases in order for the election to be thrown out. We wouldn't want that, would we?
Any of these facts you choose to refute? Any of them?
We're not even going to discuss the Acorn fiasco - where two Acorn employees were found guilty of failing to turn in voter registration forms ... forms that, coincidentally, just happened to be marked Republican. Funny how that works, huh?
Face it -- your state is corrupt. The Democrat Party in your state is corrupt, and your governor is corrupt. Learn it - live it - love it (but.... whatever you do ... don't admit it.)
Wanna discuss Franken's record in the Senate? Nahh .. I didn't think you would.