The Falkland Islands

[rationalist]

Have you noticed how Hilary Clinton has changed her schedule to go to Argentina to support their claim on the Falklands against the British?

I wonder what has made her take such a weird step?

Oh, oil has been discovered just off the coast and drilling has begun.

Of course oil has nothing to do with this like it has nothing to do with the US attacking the oil rich middle east.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Have you noticed how Hilary Clinton has changed her schedule to go to Argentina to support their claim on the Falklands against the British?

You've seen her itinerary, huh?

Have you still got the .pdf????


​

 

[rationalist]

Yes

Agenda

1) Tell the Argentinians you will put pressure on the Brits to give up the FIs if Argentina promises nine tenths of the oil to the US for 10 cents a barrel (to avoid accusations of theft)

2) Tell Argentina that if she doean't comply the US will pressure the UK into attacking again.

3) Tell Argentina that if the 2) is selected the US will attack with the Brits and force the same oil deal on the Brits in return for US 'support'.

 

[Gipper]

See this Rat? Its easy to post an article on the subject. Of course, Clinton has not sided with the Argentines as you stated. So, posting any articles backing your comments is impossible because you lie.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/02/clinton-us-britain-argentina-falklands-oil

The Brits are installing an oil rig on the Falklands. Good for them. See this...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/feb/22/falkland-islands-oil-drilling-begins

And how about this? The Great Iron Lady folded up that socialist French wimpy jackass Mitterrand by threatening to nuke Argentina if he did not release the french missile codes during the Falklands War. Now that is a leader. She saved the lives of numerous Brit soldiers and sailors which lead to a quick end to that war.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/nov/22/books.france

See that Rat? Three articles backing up my post.

Now are your really Van Jones?

 

[rationalist]

Ahh you are talking about the mad fascist Margaret Thatcher who had to be removed by her own party because she had to got the usually reserved Brits rioting in the street.

The same mad cow who destroyed British industry

The cacky fingered old witch who decided to put a choke on inflation by raising interest rats to 18% causing the worst unemployment since WW2, the highest home reposessions, the highest number of business failures etc.

In fact she caused more trouble in th UK than all the bankers in the world have done with their brand of capitalism.

She is the most detested prime minister in British history and when you consider that Bliar was one that is really saying something.

I can see why like her.

 

[Gipper]

Ahh you are talking about the mad fascist Margaret Thatcher who had to be removed by her own party because she had to got the usually reserved Brits rioting in the street.

The same mad cow who destroyed British industry

The cacky fingered old witch who decided to put a choke on inflation by raising interest rats to 18% causing the worst unemployment since WW2, the highest home reposessions, the highest number of business failures etc.

In fact she caused more trouble in th UK than all the bankers in the world have done with their brand of capitalism.

She is the most detested prime minister in British history and when you consider that Bliar was one that is really saying something.

I can see why like her.

Once again you post nonsense backed by nothing but your communist American hating opinion.

Are you Van Jones?

 

[rationalist]

You know what, what I have written is common knowledge in the informed political world

The fact that you don't know any of that detail is a perfect example of your ignorance.

It is like you asking for proof that Bush presided over the worst terrorist attack on US soil

Or that he holds the world record for turning a surplus into a deficit.

If you don't just KNOW basic facts like that you are probably stupid enough to think this US cares about you and your kind.

And if your tedious request for proof was satisfied you wouldn't change your mad neocon manipulated mind.

Now jog on sucker, your country needs more victims er er I mean suckers er er I means soldiers

 

[Gipper]

You know what, what I have written is common knowledge in the informed political world

The fact that you don't know any of that detail is a perfect example of your ignorance.

It is like you asking for proof that Bush presided over the worst terrorist attack on US soil

Or that he holds the world record for turning a surplus into a deficit.

If you don't just KNOW basic facts like that you are probably stupid enough to think this US cares about you and your kind.

And if your tedious request for proof was satisfied you wouldn't change your mad neocon manipulated mind.

Now jog on sucker, your country needs more victims er er I mean suckers er er I means soldiers

I canit finnd me uniform and it aint gonna fit anyhows. But, I's is ready to kills me sum furreners...

See, I can lie almost as good as you.

 

[rationalist]

Neither of us is lying and anyone reading what this who knows about Margaret Thatcher will know that what I wrote is true.

I'm sorry that when I wrote it I had so massively over estimated your knowldge.

And I had you down as a know nothing

 

[GenSeneca]

You know what, what I have written is common knowledge in the informed political world

I.E. Conspiracy Theory Forums

 

[rationalist]

No, the facts about Margaret Thatcher causing huge interest rises and mass unemployment are not part of a conspiracy theory.

Even you could google them and find out.

I guess your post shows how desperate you are to discredit the truth by describing it as a conspiracy theory.

 

[GenSeneca]

No, the facts about Margaret Thatcher causing huge interest rises and mass unemployment are not part of a conspiracy theory.

Even you could google them and find out.

I guess your post shows how desperate you are to discredit the truth by describing it as a conspiracy theory.

Your claims are shot down again and again yet you continually change the subject to something else without acknowledging that people have obliterated your original claims.

20 things you will NEVER hear a Conspiracy Theorist say:

13) "I've been wrong 280 times? Really? Geez, I must think next time before I post!"

11) "Now that you have defeated one of my arguments, I will be sure to not use that argument again as though nothing ever happened."

 

[rationalist]

Your continual display of ignorance explains all of your posts.

It is no wonder you think you live in a noble country.

Your country loves suckers like you who can't think for themselves and go around squealing like a stuck pig about how great it is that they are poor and a tiny number of other people are rich.

Especially when the facst are that America is one of the worst developed countries in the world to actually live in. With huge murder rates, the highest mental health problems in the developed world, hugely over populated prisons that violate internationals standards, appaling healthcare across the whole population, massive drug and alcohol abuses, huge levels of obesity, low levels of trust, and this one I particularly like - the US gives the least in aid as a % of GDP of any developed country.

Xmas is coming and gensenca's getting fat...ter

 

[The Scotsman]

No, the facts about Margaret Thatcher causing huge interest rises and mass unemployment are not part of a conspiracy theory.

..........you need to elaborate and add context!

 

[rationalist]

I did

I explained that Thatcher wanted to put a choke on inflation and she chose to use huge interest rises as the mechanism with full knowledge of how that would screw the poor.

And BTW growth under Thatcher was hardly any different to in the 70s when it ran at around 2.4% depsite the propaganda put out by the tories.

Thatcher financed her mad schemes with north sea oil wealth and selling off all the nations assets.

She broke Britain with its once proud history of manufacturing.

Her tax reductions meant that 50% of the benefit went to the top 10% of earners.

Child poverty grew faster under Thatcher than any post war leader.

I do wonder what is the point of posting factual information like this to a bunch of imbeciles who just squeal prove it all the time

They remind me of the adage that the biggest fool can ask more than the wisest man can answer