The leading leftist commie democrat simply cannot seem hide his disdain for America.

Werbung:
Obama did, in fact, resurrect the economy from the failed mess that Juniorbush has left behind, and he did it faster than most experts said was possible. You do not know diddly about Marx or Marxism. and not that much about Jesus, either.
 
mark francis said:
He got help locating Bin Laden from US servicemen and water boarding under Bush.
Click to expand...
.
1462355.jpeg

.​
"One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief. My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of (Kuwait) and he wasted it.
.
If I have a chance to invade Iraq, if I had that much capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed I want to get passed and I'm going to have a successful presidency!!!"
.
.
.
.
george-bush-looking-stupid.jpg

.
maxresdefault.jpg

.​
 
Most conservative Christian Americans typically believed the democrat socialist government forged by Obama was not what they wanted in a new Trump administration
 
Last edited:
Phoenix68 said:
Click to expand...
Democrats believe Obama was a better president because of certain economic numbers can be manipulated to indicate that more money was made in certain respects. Christians and conservatives did not like all the leftist socialism he pushed regardless of how much more or less money some groups of Americans may or may not have made.
 
mark francis said:
He got help locating Bin Laden from US servicemen and water boarding under Bush.
Click to expand...

Got help? He was the president. So he was supposed to be part of the raid personally?

Your neocon hero Bush failed to do his fucking job. If Bush kills the pos like he was supposed to(He had 7 years) Obama does not get the opportunity. Obama was reelected because of this.
 
Understand folks that Mark is a bible thumping neocon. If Trump called for a world wide nuclear war He would be cheering.

Half of MAGA, half of republicans are still neocons. They love war!
 
Starcastle said:
Got help? He was the president. So he was supposed to be part of the raid personally?

Your neocon hero Bush failed to do his fucking job. If Bush kills the pos like he was supposed to(He had 7 years) Obama does not get the opportunity. Obama was reelected because of this.
Click to expand...
Bill Clinton was the first president who failed to kill Bin Ladin when he had a chance. If it had not been for years of surveillance and military intelligence gathering under Bush Bin Ladin would have never been located and killed when he was. For Obama to claim he did it without the help from years of military intelligence under Bush is ridiculous.

www.latimes.com

Bill Clinton: 'I could have killed' Osama bin Laden in 1998

A day before Sept. 11, 2001, former President Bill Clinton told an audience that he could have had Osama bin Laden killed, but chose not to, because an attack could have endangered innocent women and children in Afghanistan.
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com
 
Starcastle said:
Understand folks that Mark is a bible thumping neocon. If Trump called for a world wide nuclear war He would be cheering.

Half of MAGA, half of republicans are still neocons. They love war!
Click to expand...
Dishonest and hateful humans invent the most heinous acts to falsely accuse others of thinking about committing.
 
mark francis said:
Bill Clinton was the first president who failed to kill Bin Ladin when he had a chance. If it had not been for years of surveillance and military intelligence gathering under Bush Bin Ladin would have never been located and killed when he was. For Obama to claim he did it without the help from years of military intelligence under Bush is ridiculous.

www.latimes.com

Bill Clinton: 'I could have killed' Osama bin Laden in 1998

A day before Sept. 11, 2001, former President Bill Clinton told an audience that he could have had Osama bin Laden killed, but chose not to, because an attack could have endangered innocent women and children in Afghanistan.
www.latimes.com www.latimes.com
Click to expand...

WTF are you talking about? There was an attack on our country. We declared war against those responsible. We spent trillions on that war of terror!

Everybody knew Bin Laden was in Pakistan where in the hell else would he be? It was a major failure of Bush not to kill him. If it was so easy based on intelligence we had and heroism of our serviceman then why didn't Dubya do it?
 
Starcastle said:
WTF are you talking about? There was an attack on our country. We declared war against those responsible. We spent trillions on that war of terror!

Everybody knew Bin Laden was in Pakistan where in the hell else would he be? It was a major failure of Bush not to kill him. If it was so easy based on intelligence we had and heroism of our serviceman then why didn't Dubya do it?
Click to expand...
First of all, I did not say Bill Clinton failed to kill Bin Ladin, he did. Secondly, from the day of the 9/11 attacks through the day Hillary successfully lobbied Congress to declare war on Iraq and through the day entered into Afghanistan in that extended war, US military and intelligence services conducted searches for Bin Ladin which finally culminated in the attack that killed him years later.

Obama did not kill Bin Ladin, the US military did.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/osama-bin-laden-death-presidents-obama-bush-clinton/story?id=13518395​



Bin Laden Death: Americans Divided Over Credit for Presidents Obama, Bush, Clinton​

Americans sharply divided over role Obama's predecessors played in operation.
ByABC News
May 3, 2011, 11:29 AM


May 4, 2011— -- A bipartisan mix of lawmakers and pundits has been heaping credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden on President Obama -- and his two predecessors, Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

But to what extent did presidential leadership play a role in ultimately finding bin Laden, and who deserves the most credit for finally finding the world's most wanted man?

Public displays of unity aside, those questions remain the subject of a subtle, but hot, partisan debate.

Obama claimed credit for himself Sunday night, emphasizing the decision to make the bin Laden manhunt a key objective was his, shortly after he took office more than two years ago. He didn't mention Bush, who wanted bin Laden "dead or alive," or Clinton, who declared him "public enemy number one."

"I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the top priority of our war against al Qaeda," Obama said early in his speech, "even as we continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat his network."

Moreover, White House aides said, Obama's decision to go forward with the dangerous secret operation, based on circumstantial evidence alone, was gutsy and bold. The odds bin Laden would actually be there were only 60 to 80 percent, Panetta told Time magazine after the fact.

Leading Republicans have publicly praised Obama for his leadership in the moment, and strong majorities of Republican voters in recent polls say they believe the president deserves credit for the mission's success.

But there's a remarkable divide between parties over just how much credit President Bush deserves. Eighty-one percent of Republicans say Bush deserves some recognition for the successful operation, according to a new Washington Post/Pew Research Center poll. Only 35 percent of Democrats said they agree.

"The information started on this four years ago, which was clearly in the Bush administration," said House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Mike Rogers of the assembly of intelligence clues that led to bin Laden's hideout.

It's "important to look at this as a continuum," former Vice President Dick Cheney said. "I mean, it's not just on one day you get up, bang, and you got Osama bin Laden."


Cheney said the so-called enhanced interrogation of detainees, a policy begun under Bush and ceased under Obama, could have "produced results that ultimately contributed to the success of this venture."

However, some Democrats have questioned whether Bush's foreign policy hastened the discovery of bin Laden's hideout at all, saying Bush didn't make the manhunt a top priority during his eight years in office, and even missed one opportunity to take bin Laden down.

"The decision not to deploy American forces to go after bin Laden or block his escape [from Tora Bora, Afghanistan, in 2001] was made by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his top commander, Gen. Tommy Franks," concluded a 2009 Senate Foreign Relations Committee report on what was believed at the time to be the last, best chance to find bin Laden.

Bin Laden later slipped into Pakistan, where he is believed to have remained until his death. Bush officials have said the intelligence on his whereabouts in Tora Bora was inconclusive at the time.

"Terror is bigger than one person, and he's just a person who's been marginalized," Bush told reporters at a White House briefing in March 2002. "I don't know where he is, and I just don't spend that much time on him, to be honest with you."

Recent Stories from ABC News
 
Werbung:
Obama did not kill Bin Ladin, the US military did.
Click to expand...

You want people to take you seriously stop talking nonsense. Obama was president and commander and chief at the time Seal team six killed Bin Laden.

Presidents do not personally go on Navy seal missions. Your heroes Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld et al failed to take out Bin Laden so Obama had the opportunity which helped him get reelected.
 


Write your reply...

Similar threads

A
As our Nation sinks, Obama lies, lies , lies!
Replies
6
Views
2K
Phoenix68
Phoenix68
A
Obama ,"VACATING" in Hawaii!!!! WHY?
Replies
0
Views
1K
always
A
A
Why did the democrat party KILL Liberalism?
2
Replies
24
Views
4K
Phoenix68
Phoenix68
A
Sarah Palin has obama and his kind scared!
2
Replies
21
Views
2K
mark francis
M
A
Has America gone "Looney Tunes"?
2
Replies
26
Views
4K
Wry Catcher
W
Back
Top