What can judges do with massive evidence of fraud? They have already proven they are incapable of trying voting fraud cases in their courts. How can a courts rule on the extent of voting fraud if they are unwilling to examine evidence before juries with both sides presenting arguments before juries?
They were quite capable and did so.
Trump was impeached by hateful leftists without corroborated evidence, without a trial, without due process, and denied a defense, so don't pretend Democrats assume people are innocent until proven guilty.
Biden does not obey border laws and refuses to obey court orders requiring student loans be repaid by the borrower and not the American taxpayer.
You claim things about courts that you cannot prove.
Of course he had due process. What law was violated *****?
Even scotus agreed with me by refusing to intervene
If he didn't obey a court order which court found him in contempt *****?
www.newsweek.com
You do not prove SCOTUS examined the mountain of fraud evidence and ruled that the evidence showed Democrats did not commit massive election fraud.
Is Biden innocent when breaking laws if he is never charged?
One biased opinion. Let me know when a judge rules that wayDonald Trump Is Being Denied His Constitutional Right to Due Process
Not only is Donald Trump on trial in these cases, but the American system of justice is on trial, not only in America but around the world.
No but you will have to explain why no court found him in contempt duh
Don't worry.
