U.S. Set to Offer Huge Arms Deal to Saudi Arabia

Truth-Bringer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
880
U.S. Set to Offer Huge Arms Deal to Saudi Arabia

By David Cloud

WASHINGTON, July 27 — The Bush administration is preparing to ask Congress to approve an arms sale package for Saudi Arabia and its neighbors that is expected to eventually total $20 billion at a time when some United States officials contend that the Saudis are playing a counterproductive role in Iraq.

The proposed package of advanced weaponry for Saudi Arabia, which includes advanced satellite-guided bombs, upgrades to its fighters and new naval vessels, has made Israel and some of its supporters in Congress nervous. Senior officials who described the package on Friday said they believed that the administration had resolved those concerns, in part by promising Israel $30.4 billion in military aid over the next decade, a significant increase over what Israel has received in the past 10 years.

But administration officials remained concerned that the size of the package and the advanced weaponry it contains, as well as broader concerns about Saudi Arabia’s role in Iraq, could prompt Saudi critics in Congress to oppose the package when Congress is formally notified about the deal this fall.

In talks about the package, the administration has not sought specific assurances from Saudi Arabia that it would be more supportive of the American effort in Iraq as a condition of receiving the arms package, the officials said.

The officials said the plan to bolster the militaries of Persian Gulf countries is part of an American strategy to contain the growing power of Iran in the region and to demonstrate that, no matter what happens in Iraq, Washington remains committed to its longtime Arab allies. Officials from the State Department and the Pentagon agreed to outline the terms of the deal after some details emerged from closed briefings this week on Capitol Hill.

The officials said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who are to make a joint visit to Saudi Arabia next week, still intended to use the trip to press the Saudis to do more to help Iraq’s Shiite-dominated government.

“The role of the Sunni Arab neighbors is to send a positive, affirmative message to moderates in Iraq in government that the neighbors are with you,” a senior State Department official told reporters in a conference call on Friday. More specifically, the official said, the United States wants the gulf states to make clear to Sunnis engaged in violence in Iraq that such actions are “killing your future.”

In addition to promising an increase in American military aid to Israel, the Pentagon is seeking to ease Israel’s concerns over the proposed weapons sales to Saudi Arabia by asking the Saudis to accept restrictions on the range, size and location of the satellite-guided bombs, including a commitment not to store the weapons at air bases close to Israeli territory, the officials said.

The package and the possible steps to allay Israel’s concerns were described to Congress this week, in an effort by the administration to test the reaction on Capitol Hill before entering into final negotiations on the package with Saudi officials. The Saudis had requested that Congress be told about the planned sale, the officials said, in an effort to avoid the kind of bruising fight on Capitol Hill that occurred in the 1980s over proposed arms sales to the kingdom.

In his visit with King Abdullah and other Saudi officials next week, Mr. Gates plans to describe “what the administration is willing to go forward with” in the arms package and “what we would recommend to the Hill and others,” according to a senior Pentagon official, who conducted a background briefing on the upcoming trip with reporters on Friday.

The official added that Mr. Gates would also reassure the Saudis that “regardless of what happens in the near term in Iraq that our commitment in the region remains firm, remains steadfast and that, in fact, we are looking to enhance and develop it.”

The $20 billion price tag on the package is more than double what officials originally estimated when details became public this spring. Even the higher figure is a rough estimate that could fluctuate depending on the final package, which would be carried out over a number of years, officials said.

Worried about the impression that the United States was starting an arms race in the region, State and Defense Department officials stressed that the arms deal was being proposed largely in response to improvements in Iran’s military capabilities and to counter the threat posed by its nuclear program, which the Bush administration contends is aimed at building nuclear weapons.

Rest of article here
 
Werbung:
Saudi ...............


where the "Alleged" hijackers/terrorists ORIGINATED btw.......

whats wrong with this picture?

friggin sheep


its too late

we are screwed
 
Saudi ...............


where the "Alleged" hijackers/terrorists ORIGINATED btw.......

whats wrong with this picture?

friggin sheep


its too late

we are screwed

You can't have it both ways. Either there were no hijackers and the entire attack was perpetrated by the gov't, or the hijackers came from Saudi Arabia and we shouldn't be dealing with them.

Pick one.
 
what a simpleton's approach, to a complex issue .
there is no need to even humor you with the slightest of response ......
have a nice day
 
what a simpleton's approach, to a complex issue .
there is no need to even humor you with the slightest of response ......
have a nice day

Roker, it's not complex. You're on paper having stated that you believe 9/11 was an inside job, thus exonerating the terrorists from Saudi Arabia. Now you come on record decrying our relations with Saudi Arabia because that's where the hijackers came from. Make up your mind.

And I can't really say I'm surprised by your lack of a response. Close to 1000 posts and virtually none were thoughtful.
 
Roker, it's not complex. You're on paper having stated that you believe 9/11 was an inside job,

Actually there you go again with this simplistic misdirecting drivel.have I actually said it was an inside job? or is it the fact that i question the official story? because one, does not equal the other, my simple minded stalker friend.I believe the official story is incorrect,and there are far too many un-answered questions and implausible theories.
thus exonerating the terrorists from Saudi Arabia. Now you come on record decrying our relations with Saudi Arabia because that's where the hijackers came from. Make up your mind.
again you show us the simplicity of your brainwashed jar of a head. even if if proclaimed proof of an inside job,How does this automatically exonerate the "Alleged" Saudi "Terrorists"? only a child would try this tack in a debate? By golly, gee willikers the government would never use anybody, but they,re own in a plan would they?
they wouldnt ever try and frame patsies would they? there couldnt be involvement at any other level could there be? oh no not in your black and white world

And I can't really say I'm surprised by your lack of a response. Close to 1000 posts and virtually none were thoughtful.
my lil stalker bud has all my stats.............i dont do the Neal and Bob thing Gyrene
 
Saudi ...............


where the "Alleged" hijackers/terrorists ORIGINATED btw.......

I have to chuckle that you think Saudi Arabia shares blame for 9/11 because the hijackers were ethnic Saudis, and then accuse someone else of being a simpleton. :lol:
 
Werbung:
i keep waiting for.......................

..................the hidden trump card to be presented ...........this might be it


get in there police iraq with other ARAB countrys support u.s. efforts to secure the 3 provences of IRAQ : KURD ****E SUNNI countrys of same help areas of same usa preserve the boarders ............GET OUT of the middle of it they are ready .almost they just aren't doing it because we are:cool:
 
Back
Top