Washington D.C. forced to finally comply with voting laws

[mark francis]

Or, at least the leftist officials claim under threat of court action that they will clean up their bloated voter rolls as required by law. Bloated voter rolls are useful to crooks because crooks can have voting machines stuff elections with fake names that are not necessarily on the roll, and many of them aren't, but just the number of apparent registered voters hides the fact that the number of votes is far above the number that would be expected if the voting registries were thinner because of dead weight purging.

In other words, ineligible names on voter rolls mask the fact in crooked elections that the vote count is far above what it would be if compared only to legitimately registered voters.

 

[pjmret]

Ohio purged 26,000 voters days before abortion referendum deadline​

righties love to play games with voting rolls.

One of those hit with challenges was James McWhorter, who received a letter at the barbershop he manages in the middle of October from DeKalb County informing him that someone had challenged his voter status. The challenger, a woman named Gail Lee, argued McWhorter improperly registered to vote at a commercial address and snapped photos of his barbershop, which is located inside an Atlanta-area Kroger supermarket. Since the two had never met, there was no way for Lee to know that McWhorter had registered to vote at the shop's address in 2008 because he was homeless at the time. A veteran of the Gulf War, he was still trying to get back on his feet after years of struggling with PTSD and alcoholism.

righties hate veterans apparently.


The Virginia Department of Elections says about 3,400 people were mistakenly removed from the state’s voter rolls, revealing a total far greater than its initial estimate less than two weeks from Election Day.

another right wing "mistake"? sure...

 

[mark francis]

Ohio purged 26,000 voters days before abortion referendum deadline​

righties love to play games with voting rolls.

One of those hit with challenges was James McWhorter, who received a letter at the barbershop he manages in the middle of October from DeKalb County informing him that someone had challenged his voter status. The challenger, a woman named Gail Lee, argued McWhorter improperly registered to vote at a commercial address and snapped photos of his barbershop, which is located inside an Atlanta-area Kroger supermarket. Since the two had never met, there was no way for Lee to know that McWhorter had registered to vote at the shop's address in 2008 because he was homeless at the time. A veteran of the Gulf War, he was still trying to get back on his feet after years of struggling with PTSD and alcoholism.

righties hate veterans apparently.


The Virginia Department of Elections says about 3,400 people were mistakenly removed from the state’s voter rolls, revealing a total far greater than its initial estimate less than two weeks from Election Day.

another right wing "mistake"? sure...

The law cannot be ignored just because a handful of people feel wronged by it. Suck it up and get with the voting security program established by law.

 

[pjmret]

The law cannot be ignored just because a handful of people feel wronged by it. Suck it up and get with the voting security program established by law.

where did I say not to obey the law, moron?

does the law say to harrass valid voters and take them off the rolls illegally?

 

[mark francis]

where did I say not to obey the law, moron?

does the law say to harrass valid voters and take them off the rolls illegally?

The law says to remove the thousands of names of ineligible voters in spite of the objections of leftists and a few disgruntled voters unwilling to do their part to keep our elections safe from theft by crooks.

 

[pjmret]

The law says to remove the thousands of names of ineligible voters in spite of the objections of leftists and a few disgruntled voters unwilling to do their part to keep our elections safe from theft by crooks.

and righties love to take off ineligible voters.

its illustrates perfectly that dems want people to vote and republicans do their best to obstruct valid voters.

 

[mark francis]

and righties love to take off ineligible voters.

its illustrates perfectly that dems want people to vote and republicans do their best to obstruct valid voters.

Lefties despise voting securities and will try to keep voter registries illegally bloated by claiming removing ineligible names from bloated rolls sometimes eliminates eligible names by accident. That is no reason to do away with voting securities required by law.

 

[Boris Norris]

Or, at least the leftist officials claim under threat of court action that they will clean up their bloated voter rolls as required by law. Bloated voter rolls are useful to crooks because crooks can have voting machines stuff elections with fake names that are not necessarily on the roll, and many of them aren't, but just the number of apparent registered voters hides the fact that the number of votes is far above the number that would be expected if the voting registries were thinner because of dead weight purging.

In other words, ineligible names on voter rolls mask the fact in crooked elections that the vote count is far above what it would be if compared only to legitimately registered voters.

Show us the evidence of this.

 

[Boris Norris]

The law says to remove the thousands of names of ineligible voters in spite of the objections of leftists and a few disgruntled voters unwilling to do their part to keep our elections safe from theft by crooks.

Not sure that any law says that but I don't disagree with the process.

Democrats have never objected to voter fraud etc.
Ironically, when the dems want to introduce stringent voter ID you bellow about free speech and some type of communist plot.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Or, at least the leftist officials claim under threat of court action that they will clean up their bloated voter rolls as required by law. Bloated voter rolls are useful to crooks because crooks can have voting machines stuff elections with fake names that are not necessarily on the roll, and many of them aren't, but just the number of apparent registered voters hides the fact that the number of votes is far above the number that would be expected if the voting registries were thinner because of dead weight purging.

In other words, ineligible names on voter rolls mask the fact in crooked elections that the vote count is far above what it would be if compared only to legitimately registered voters.

LMAO: Grow up, buddy, you haven't a bit of common sense. Haven't you noticed that The Donald's Lawyers admitted they lied too?

 

[mark francis]

Not sure that any law says that but I don't disagree with the process.

Democrats have never objected to voter fraud etc.
Ironically, when the dems want to introduce stringent voter ID you bellow about free speech and some type of communist plot.

You should stop talking about this, especially since you claim you do not know the law. I suspect there are tens of thousands of Democrats in authority who either do not know the law or who have no intention of obeying it.

 

[mark francis]

LMAO: Grow up, buddy, you haven't a bit of common sense. Haven't you noticed that The Donald's Lawyers admitted they lied too?

Everybody lies, especially the crooks that now have Trump in court on bogus charges for wicked political purposes.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Everybody lies, especially the crooks that now have Trump in court on bogus charges for wicked political purposes.

LOL: Not everyone lies. Name those "crooks"? I'm damn sure that Trump is a crook and corrupt for eight decades.

 

[mark francis]

LOL: Not everyone lies. Name those "crooks"? I'm damn sure that Trump is a crook and corrupt for eight decades.

You are wrong. Every man lies, especially unsaved rebels against God.

Psalm 116:11
I said in my haste, All men are liars.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Everybody lies, especially the crooks that now have Trump in court on bogus charges for wicked political purposes.

It's clear to me that Donald Trump is wicked in business and political for purposes. Will you vote for The Donald***, and if you do explain to me what ethics and morality has he expressed?

***If The Donald is not in prison and/or unable do to the facts of Sec. 3 of the 14th Amendment, to wit:

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."