Well well well.

[mark francis]

Her job was to break laws? No
There are procedures if you claim fraud
She took the law into her own hands and was rightfully arrested duh

Tina peters was a county clerk. In spite of Democrat misinterpretations and alterations of election laws she was still performing her legal duties to have the voting machines examined by impartial investigators.

crs2019-title-01.pdf (colorado.gov)

1-5-605.5. Custody of voting system. The county clerk and recorder or designated election official shall be the custodian of the voting system in a political subdivision and may appoint deputies necessary to prepare and supervise the voting system prior to and during elections.

 

[mark francis]

Nah you are a proven liar you name that audit *****
But you wont

You can access the report at this location:

Colorado Clerk Tina Peters Releases Report - Claims Dominion Voting Machines Used in 2020 Election Were Illegally Certified and Illegally Configured | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

 

[pjmret]

You can access the report at this location:

Colorado Clerk Tina Peters Releases Report - Claims Dominion Voting Machines Used in 2020 Election Were Illegally Certified and Illegally Configured | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

she isn't an auditor *****.
she is a county clerk. not the same thing. duh

 

[pjmret]

Tina peters was a county clerk. In spite of Democrat misinterpretations and alterations of election laws she was still performing her legal duties to have the voting machines examined by impartial investigators.

crs2019-title-01.pdf (colorado.gov)

1-5-605.5. Custody of voting system. The county clerk and recorder or designated election official shall be the custodian of the voting system in a political subdivision and may appoint deputies necessary to prepare and supervise the voting system prior to and during elections.

they weren't "preparing and supervising"" the system "prior to and during" elections, *****.
this was AFTER the election for example. nor were they "preparing and supervising".

you fail..agian. lol

 

[Phoenix68]

...You can access the report at this location:

Colorado Clerk Tina Peters Releases Report - Claims Dominion Voting Machines Used in 2020 Election Were Illegally Certified and Illegally Configured | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

.

.
"GATEWAY PUNDIT!!!!!"
.
.​

 

[mark francis]

she isn't an auditor *****.
she is a county clerk. not the same thing. duh

She was a county clerk and her job by law was handling voting machines. She hired an auditor to examine her voting machines and Democrats went ballistic with fear and anger.

 

[mark francis]

they weren't "preparing and supervising"" the system "prior to and during" elections, *****.
this was AFTER the election for example. nor were they "preparing and supervising".

you fail..agian. lol

She was responsible for her voting machines before, during, and after the election, and she performed her responsibilities honorably.

 

[pjmret]

She was responsible for her voting machines before, during, and after the election, and she performed her responsibilities honorably.

honorably by breaking numerous laws? that's right wing "honor" alright. lol. being "responsible" doesn't give you the right to take the law in your own hands, *****

 

[pjmret]

She was a county clerk and her job by law was handling voting machines. She hired an auditor to examine her voting machines and Democrats went ballistic with fear and anger.

what "auditor"? what were their credentials? is there a processs for auditing machines? did she follow it?

 

[Phoenix68]

She was responsible for her voting machines before, during, and after the election, and she performed her responsibilities honorably.

.

.
There was a lot o' that goin' around!!!!
.

.​

 

[Boris Norris]

Your reply lacks persuasive arguments. Election laws in Colorado have not been set in stone since the beginning but are in constant flux, having been modified, changed, amended, altered, or rewritten many times over the years. Many states under Democrat control rewrote their election laws prior to the 2020 election to give advantages to Democrat candidates. That fact is indisputable.

Colorado made changes to its election laws in 2019, under Democrat control with a former Obama elections czar as Secretary of State.
The old and new law has provisions for certifying voting machines but no provisions for investigations of machines after an election in which miraculously high numbers of votes were submitted by the machines for the candidate of the party in control of the machines. The laws make provision for possible fraud in other areas but no provision for investigating whether the SOS in charge of elections colluded with corrupt voting machine providers to alter the election in favor of his or her party candidate.

The 2019 provision vested all power to examine voting machines in the partisan Secretary of State, who wrote rules favoring the Democrat Party candidates and restrictions against investigating possible voting machine fraud.

crs2019-title-01.pdf (colorado.gov)

Snipped quotes:

Elected officials not to handle voting equipment or devices. (1) In any political subdivision having a population of one hundred thousand or more, it is unlawful for any elected official or candidate for elective office to prepare, maintain, or repair any voting equipment or device that is to be used or is used in any election.

Elected officials not to handle voting equipment or devices. (1) In any political subdivision having a population of one hundred thousand or more, it is unlawful for any elected official or candidate for elective office to prepare, maintain, or repair any voting equipment or device that is to be used or is used in any election.

Your reply lacks persuasive arguments. Election laws in Colorado have not been set in stone since the beginning but are in constant flux, having been modified, changed, amended, altered, or rewritten many times over the years. Many states under Democrat control rewrote their election laws prior to the 2020 election to give advantages to Democrat candidates. That fact is indisputable.

Colorado made changes to its election laws in 2019, under Democrat control with a former Obama elections czar as Secretary of State.
The old and new law has provisions for certifying voting machines but no provisions for investigations of machines after an election in which miraculously high numbers of votes were submitted by the machines for the candidate of the party in control of the machines. The laws make provision for possible fraud in other areas but no provision for investigating whether the SOS in charge of elections colluded with corrupt voting machine providers to alter the election in favor of his or her party candidate.

The 2019 provision vested all power to examine voting machines in the partisan Secretary of State, who wrote rules favoring the Democrat Party candidates and restrictions against investigating possible voting machine fraud.

crs2019-title-01.pdf (colorado.gov)

Snipped quotes:

Elected officials not to handle voting equipment or devices. (1) In any political subdivision having a population of one hundred thousand or more, it is unlawful for any elected official or candidate for elective office to prepare, maintain, or repair any voting equipment or device that is to be used or is used in any election.

Your point is. Did you notice no one is allowed to touch them including nut cases wanting to alter them. Do you ever read anything.

Elected officials not to handle voting equipment or devices. (1) In any political subdivision having a population of one hundred thousand or more, it is unlawful for any elected official or candidate for elective office to prepare, maintain, or repair any voting equipment or device that is to be used or is used in any election.

Heres an amendment that doesn't further a your cause. ..
The ballot title for the initiative is:

A change to the Colorado Revised Statutes adopting approval voting, a voting method in which electors may cast votes for multiple candidates in each race in all state and local elections and the winner in each race is the candidate or, in the case of a multiple-seat race, candidates, receiving the highest number of votes cast.
— Ballot Title Setting Board (2 January 2020)[16]

You have clearly stated laws were passed to deliberately stop people investigating fraud. Is that the one?

 

[mark francis]

honorably by breaking numerous laws? that's right wing "honor" alright. lol. being "responsible" doesn't give you the right to take the law in your own hands, *****

She didn't break laws so much as she broke recently enacted Democrat rules by exposing multiple laws that were broken by incompetent or corrupt election officials in the 2020 election.

 

[mark francis]

what "auditor"? what were their credentials? is there a processs for auditing machines? did she follow it?

You will just have to find out for yourself whom authored the report that I referenced the source of.

 

[mark francis]

Your point is. Did you notice no one is allowed to touch them including nut cases wanting to alter them. Do you ever read anything.

No, I did not, which causes me to wonder why she was arrested for allegedly violating a provision that was not even included in the law.

 

[Boris Norris]

No, I did not, which causes me to wonder why she was arrested for allegedly violating a provision that was not even included in the law.

She virtually smashed her way into the premises and carried on like the typical Maga nut she is.