What do you call it when MAGA extolls Charlie Kirk?

The poor guy who had to change his diapers when he was on the Apprentice told the whole story. You are just a dunce if you cannot inform yourself. We have all seen videos of people reacting to Trump's putrid shitty stench.
Nothing turns the stomach of a godless degenerate than for a politician to support Biblical views and values.


1759270682211.webp
 
Werbung:
The poor guy who had to change his diapers when he was on the Apprentice told the whole story. You are just a dunce if you cannot inform yourself. We have all seen videos of people reacting to Trump's putrid shitty stench.
so you know he pisses and shits himself every day so prove it post the story o you also claimed trans people have less rights then me tell us all what they are
 
Shitshizpants is a serial adulterer, who tells the American people that he hates all who do not support him in his vile attempt to deprive citizens of their health care while he subsidizes health care for Israelis, many of whom are genocidal terrorists, all to benefit the ultra rich billionaires. He deserves prison.
 
Shitshizpants is a serial adulterer, who tells the American people that he hates all who do not support him in his vile attempt to deprive citizens of their health care while he subsidizes health care for Israelis, many of whom are genocidal terrorists, all to benefit the ultra rich billionaires. He deserves prison.
What seems to be the democrat infatuation with adulterers?

1759329698288.webp
1759329776956.webp

1759329847936.webp


1759329983280.webp


1759330038505.webp
 
Yeah, he eventually told the truth about the genocide in Gaza. Netanyahu offered him a million or so, and he refused. Three das later Charlie Kirk was dead.

You are truly a dunce.
Is this enough to obtain an indictment against Netanyahu? What if Kirk disagreed with a transgender woman and she got angry with him and two days later Kirk is dead? Would that be enough evidence to indict the transgender? No, not in a sane society.
 
Is this enough to obtain an indictment against Netanyahu? What if Kirk disagreed with a transgender woman and she got angry with him and two days later Kirk is dead? Would that be enough evidence to indict the transgender? No, not in a sane society.
Netanyahu is a fuckin monster. If he had been competent, there would have been no Oct. 17 attack. Was he capable of arranging an assassination? He has arranged hundreds of them. He is holding thousands of Palestinians in prisons, were they are tortured, with no charges brought against them.

The possibility that Netanyahu arranged to kill Kirk needs to be looked into.
 
Yeah, he eventually told the truth about the genocide in Gaza. Netanyahu offered him a million or so, and he refused. Three das later Charlie Kirk was dead.

You are truly a dunce.
Your a idiot they didn't put a hit out on him are you really that stupid. He was shot by a left wing nut job .your sick and full of shit and lie lie lie.prove you claim asshole
 
Netanyahu is a fuckin monster. If he had been competent, there would have been no Oct. 17 attack. Was he capable of arranging an assassination? He has arranged hundreds of them. He is holding thousands of Palestinians in prisons, were they are tortured, with no charges brought against them.

The possibility that Netanyahu arranged to kill Kirk needs to be looked into.
Deranged lefties: "Netanyahu is a monster for defending the despicable Jews from attacks by God's people the Palestinians who have a mission from God to kill every Jew in the land."
 
God will provide the missing 'proof' when He returns to judge the wicked.
That ainta gonna happen. It didn't happen 2000 years before today, and we will all die and 10,000 years later, it still won't have happened. And "God" being omnipotent would have no reason or nee to justify anything to anyone.
 
That ainta gonna happen. It didn't happen 2000 years before today, and we will all die and 10,000 years later, it still won't have happened. And "God" being omnipotent would have no reason or nee to justify anything to anyone.

2 Peter 3:3-5

3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,

4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.

5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
 
For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
WTF is that ^^^ supposed to mean? The earth is neither out of the water nor in the water.

We are supposed to believe that the Earth was made exactly for humans, a terrestrial species, although most of it is covered by water. We as a species are not really good swimmers.

The Bible tells us that meteorites and meteors are stars that fall from the sky, which is of course false. It tells us that the Three Magi managed to get to Bethlehem by following a star.

Think about it: you cannot follow a star. Try it if you don't believe it. And then for some reason, they inquired at Herod's court about the birth of Jesus, so I suppose that following a star was not all that great an idea. And inquiring about a supposed king at the court of a standing king, well, that sort of proves that they were not all that wise.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top