Libsmasher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 3,151
Why is it that every single conceivable gender/racial/sexual orientation group there is has political groups which lobby on their behalf, except white males?
20 million white people are in poverty:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...=Top/Reference/Times Topics/Subjects/C/Census
It is exactly these people who will be kept down when they get the "affirmative action" door slammed in their face. White males (obviously, I exclude the white establishment which supports anti-white discrimination, and most of all, white uncle toms) should organize and fight back. What is the likely outcome, when every conceivable group politically organizes in interests, but one doesn't?
Why should a white middle class male get the door slammed in his face by "DI-versity", the rational logical ethical reason being he has white skin, and some people 150 years ago who were mean to minorities had white skin too?
Anyone here have guts enough to really debate this?
20 million white people are in poverty:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...=Top/Reference/Times Topics/Subjects/C/Census
It is exactly these people who will be kept down when they get the "affirmative action" door slammed in their face. White males (obviously, I exclude the white establishment which supports anti-white discrimination, and most of all, white uncle toms) should organize and fight back. What is the likely outcome, when every conceivable group politically organizes in interests, but one doesn't?
Why should a white middle class male get the door slammed in his face by "DI-versity", the rational logical ethical reason being he has white skin, and some people 150 years ago who were mean to minorities had white skin too?
Anyone here have guts enough to really debate this?