mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 24,957
The answer should be obvious. Crooks, thieves, and liars have been committing voter fraud for decades and have found it very effective in getting officials elected who will benefit the greedy and selfish crooks who got them illegally elected.
Thank God for good people like Kari Lake who are still fighting to remove windows to fraud from our elections process.
Court Finds Arizona’s Signature Matching Process Unlawful in ‘Massive Win’ for Election Integrity | NTD
Court Finds Arizona’s Signature Matching Process Unlawful in ‘Massive Win’ for Election Integrity
By Tom Ozimek
September 7, 2023Politics314
A judge has found that Arizona’s signature matching process for mail-in ballots is unlawful, delivering what the plaintiffs in the lawsuit called a “massive win” for election integrity.
Yavapai County Superior Court Judge John Napper issued a ruling last week (pdf) in a lawsuit against Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes brought by public interest group Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections (RITE), which alleged that Mr. Fontes broke the law regarding mail-in ballot signature verification procedures.
Specifically, the group argued that Mr. Fontes’ interpretation of “registration record” in the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual was unreasonably broad and improperly expanded the pool of signatures to which an early ballot affidavit signature could be compared, increasing the risk of false positives.
“While state law requires county recorders to match mail-ballot signatures with signatures in the voter’s ‘registration record,’ the Secretary instructed them to use a broader and less reliable universe of comparison signatures,” RITE said in a Sept. 5 statement on the court ruling.
“That means the Secretary was requiring ballots to be counted despite using a signature that did not match anything in the voter’s registration record. This was a clear violation of state law,” the group added.
Thank God for good people like Kari Lake who are still fighting to remove windows to fraud from our elections process.
Court Finds Arizona’s Signature Matching Process Unlawful in ‘Massive Win’ for Election Integrity | NTD
Court Finds Arizona’s Signature Matching Process Unlawful in ‘Massive Win’ for Election Integrity
By Tom Ozimek
September 7, 2023Politics314
A judge has found that Arizona’s signature matching process for mail-in ballots is unlawful, delivering what the plaintiffs in the lawsuit called a “massive win” for election integrity.
Yavapai County Superior Court Judge John Napper issued a ruling last week (pdf) in a lawsuit against Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes brought by public interest group Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections (RITE), which alleged that Mr. Fontes broke the law regarding mail-in ballot signature verification procedures.
Specifically, the group argued that Mr. Fontes’ interpretation of “registration record” in the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual was unreasonably broad and improperly expanded the pool of signatures to which an early ballot affidavit signature could be compared, increasing the risk of false positives.
“While state law requires county recorders to match mail-ballot signatures with signatures in the voter’s ‘registration record,’ the Secretary instructed them to use a broader and less reliable universe of comparison signatures,” RITE said in a Sept. 5 statement on the court ruling.
“That means the Secretary was requiring ballots to be counted despite using a signature that did not match anything in the voter’s registration record. This was a clear violation of state law,” the group added.