1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

"Assualt" weapons

Discussion in 'U.S. Politics' started by Cody Aragon, May 25, 2007.

  1. Cody Aragon

    Cody Aragon New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you believe they should keep the ban on "Assualt" weapons?
     
  2. Chin

    Chin New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No. Opposed.
     
  3. Cody Aragon

    Cody Aragon New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As do i. I believe the only reason they want to ban weapons like the AR-15 or SKS is because they "look scary". I see no viable reason to ban them.
     
  4. Chin

    Chin New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    First they take your guns. Then they take your voice.

    It's all downhill from there.
     
  5. Think for myself

    Think for myself New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As a liberal, a hunter, and an owner of an SKS I am conflicted. I trust myself with a gun like that. I don't know if I trust everyone. They are cheap, reliable, and very powerful. I say stricter enforcement of our current laws.
     
  6. Chin

    Chin New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    TFM,

    I have to ask you to back up. Because your post seems to be a classic liberal flaw, IMO. You're saying, I trust myself, but everyone else can't be as smart as I and must be controlled by the government. Therefore, I am willing to forego my freedom to protect myself and others from the stupid people.
     
  7. vyo476

    vyo476 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    I used to be in favor of banning assault weapons but the discussion in the thread I started on Gun Rights has convinced me otherwise. So long as there is a decent licensing program and decent enforcement of the laws yeah...I can get behind people wanting to keep their large caliber arms.
     
  8. Think for myself

    Think for myself New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No problem Here is the deal. I was not always liberal. I grew up hunting and fishing. From 12 years old on I had guns. I certainly have seen what bullets can do on impact, as a buck and duck or two can testify. I realize the dangers of guns, and the consequences of pulling a trigger. Now, would I defend my home? Certainly. I also do not have a problem waiting two weeks for a new gun for the government to ensure that I can legally own one. Now, if the current laws were followed properly, then the VT shooter would not have gotten his hands on a gun. Enforce the laws we have, no additional ones.
     
  9. Chin

    Chin New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    You got it. There is a reason that it's the 2nd ammend. Becuase it is vital to ensuring the rights provided in the 1st.

    Imagine someone saying to you..."Bloggers incited a mob to voilence against a Mosque. We have tracked this and this is not an isolated incident. Therefore, freedom of speech on the internet is a danger to the public at large and it will be restricted."
     
  10. Chin

    Chin New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, that makes sense. You and I seem to be on the same page in that a more critical and restrictive eye should be directed at owners, not weapons.
     
  11. Think for myself

    Think for myself New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Absolutely. This bleeding heart knows that guns don't pull their own triggers.
     
  12. Cody Aragon

    Cody Aragon New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Yes he would have. It ay have been a bit harder and illegaly, but he would have gotten ahold of a gun reguardless.
     
  13. vyo476

    vyo476 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,401
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    People who are crazy enough will find a way. Insanity is the mother of innovation. Well, step-mom, anyway.
     
  14. Chin

    Chin New Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And as many have pointed out. If that brave teacher had been allowed to carry, the body count may have been as low as 2, including crazy boy.
     
  15. Think for myself

    Think for myself New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are correct. I should have stated he would not have been able to legally acquire a weapon.
     
Loading...

Share This Page