1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Breaking The Law And Civil Disobedience?

Discussion in 'U.S. Politics' started by Brandon, May 10, 2007.

  1. Brandon

    Brandon New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    373
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you think it is justifiable for people to break the law during protests or other methods to further their viewpoints/causes?

    If yes, to what extent should it go to (up to felony, everything except murder, etc...)?

    If no, why do you feel that it is not justifiable to break the law under this circumstance?
     
  2. dong

    dong New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    649
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is one hell of a paradox if I ever saw one (and you know it!) The protest would be directed against the government and the laws, and taking it further could constitute conspiracy against government (treason)...

    Insofar as this is a political thread, and a topical one at that, I'm tempted to go back to constitutionality, like everybody else seems to, because that's the only fairly constant referent I can see off the top of my head. Most objections these days are against threats to "freedoms as writ in the constitution" so breaching that in any meaningful sense would probably be hypocritical.
     
  3. mtatum4496

    mtatum4496 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Quakers are a good example of a group that is able to practice civil disobedience but do so in a manner that does not endanger the welfare of other people.

    It should be noted that civil disobedience does not automatically mean breaking the law. Civil disobedience can mean gathering in a duly organized protest rally or march that is operating by virtue of a permit issued by the local government.

    I remember a few years back seeing images protesting the war in Iraq, where people were yelling obscenities and shaking their fists at law officers who had been called in to remove protesters who were blocking a public roadway. that same day, I saw images of a war protest organized by the AFSC that involved singing, handing out literature, speeches, and other tools that are the earmarks of peaceful protest. The sad thing is that the AFSC was better organized and had more facts on hand to share, but it was the lip-splitting bunch that got the lion's share of the media attention.
     
  4. mamab

    mamab New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've always heard that the squeaky wheel gets the oil, so it's no surprise that the people making the most noise will get the most attention. That doesn't mean the other side doesn't have valid points, they just aren't heard because they're not loud enough.
     
  5. berlinlife06

    berlinlife06 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    In some countries, civil disobedience is protected by the Constitution, and the citizens can protest against the government that they don't feel is the legitimate government for the land. In the States, I guess it all depends on what kind of laws are being broken to protest. But it is something that people that protest know as a risk. Many have been detained for protesting. I don't think it goes on their records though, because they are free to go after a couple of hours.
     
  6. tater03

    tater03 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I feel that every one has the right to protest and if they break the law I generally don't have a problem with it. It is when it starts to become violent that I have a problem.
     
Loading...

Share This Page