Dismantling America

"So, if natural gas is so plentiful and cheap, why not give a tax credit for natural gas automobiles? New, or conversions, would provide more jobs and national economic growth. Now that is change, but the politicians wouldn't wouldn't gain wallet share, so it won't happen.

By the way, the almost all current car models could be converted with very little effort."


Good point, we often wonder the same thing. Several weeks ago a representative of the Natural Gas industry appeared on a news program, I can't remember which one, and addressed this issue. He was blaming his own industry. According to him they didn't do a very good job of working Congress to push the issue and they're now having to play catch up.

The current cost of a natural gas conversion for a vehicle runs about $600 to $900, but that's not the problem. The availability of being able to re-fuel is the issue. Very, very few gas stations have the product available. That area would have to be developed before it would become a practical, for the masses, alternative.
You mean like starting a whole new "green economy".

Back to the climate hoax.

Steven Horwitz

Media Manipulation and Environmentalism
Critics of markets often argue that corporations manipulate images, both still and moving, to "trick" buyers into purchasing their products. Of course, in the market, if said products don't deliver, buyers have alternatives.

Not so in politics, where such manipulation is plentiful as well and where the decisions of the state give us no alternatives.

In my post yesterday, I mentioned NASA scientist James Hansen's Torquemada impersonation in his call to try oil executives for crimes against humanity. This morning, I read an account over on Planet Gore of Hansen's first testimony on global warming 20 years ago and the way in which several members of Congress and staff manipulated the visual scene to create support for Hansen's testimony. Here's an excerpt from the account linked above:



Specifically, the PBS series Frontline aired a special in April 2007 that lifted the curtain on the sort of illusions that politicians and their abettors employed to kick off the campaign.

Frontline interviewed key players in the June 1988 Senate hearing at which then-Senator Al Gore rolled out the official conversion from panic over “global cooling” to global warming alarmism. Frontline interviewed Gore’s colleague, then-Sen. Tim Wirth (now running Ted Turner’s UN Foundation). Comforted by the friendly nature of the PBS program, Wirth freely admitted the clever scheming that went into getting the dramatic shot of scientist James Hansen mopping his brow amid a sweaty press corps. An admiring Frontline termed this “Stagecraft.”

Sen. TIMOTHY WIRTH (D-CO), 1987-1993: We knew there was this scientist at NASA, you know, who had really identified the human impact before anybody else had done so and was very certain about it. So we called him up and asked him if he would testify.

DEBORAH AMOS: On Capitol Hill, Sen. Timothy Wirth was one of the few politicians already concerned about global warming, and he was not above using a little stagecraft for Hansen's testimony.

TIMOTHY WIRTH: We called the Weather Bureau and found out what historically was the hottest day of the summer. Well, it was June 6th or June 9th or whatever it was. So we scheduled the hearing that day, and bingo, it was the hottest day on record in Washington, or close to it.

DEBORAH AMOS: [on camera] Did you also alter the temperature in the hearing room that day?

TIMOTHY WIRTH: What we did is that we went in the night before and opened all the windows, I will admit, right, so that the air conditioning wasn't working inside the room. And so when the- when the hearing occurred, there was not only bliss, which is television cameras and double figures, but it was really hot.[Shot of witnesses at hearing]

WIRTH: Dr. Hansen, if you’d start us off, we’d appreciate it. The wonderful Jim Hansen was wiping his brow at the table at the hearing, at the witness table, and giving this remarkable testimony.[nice shot of a sweaty Hansen]

JAMES HANSEN: [June 1988 Senate hearing] Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe, with a high degree of confidence, a cause-and-effect relationship to the greenhouse effect.

Next time someone accuses capitalists of using manipulative images to persuade people to buy something, you might bring this little incident up and point out that at least we have choices in the market.
 
Werbung:
"CNN) -- Human-induced global warming is real, according to a recent U.S. survey based on the opinions of 3,146 scientists. However there remains divisions between climatologists and scientists from other areas of earth sciences as to the extent of human responsibility."

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/01/19/eco.globalwarmingsurvey/index.html

The IPCC said that human caused warming did not exist until 1970.

And since the climate has not warmed since 1998 that leaves 28 years total of human caused global warming according to IPCC.
 
Werbung:
The report you cited was authored by Dr. Fred S. Singer, a paid consultant for Exxon, Sun Oil and Shell. Hardly unbiased. Further, the report has been debunked....

http://ourchangingclimate.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/the-nipcc-report/

The IPCC report was created by a bunch of politicians who listed the scientists sometimes without their approval which means that it was debunked.

How about we ignore both of them and just restrict things that are real pollutants like mercury?
 
Back
Top