1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Governor signs Gay Marriage Bill in New Hampshire

Discussion in 'Culture & Religion' started by top gun, Jun 3, 2009.

  1. top gun

    top gun New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    Well yet another state... now 6 in all... have said no to bigotry and silly personal prejudice.

    The Governor of New Hampshire today signed a Bill allowing for gay couples to marry and obtain the same recognition, responsibilities & rights as straight couples.

    Seems fair. Adults being married straight or gay only adds to overall monogamous stability.

    GOOD ON YA NEW HAMPSHIRE!!!!!!!:)
     
  2. ASPCA4EVER

    ASPCA4EVER New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,555
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Land of the JAYHAWKS-ROCK CHOCK Jayhawk, KU
    The 'Domino Affect' is well on the way of the down hill slide...OMG, :eek: this will surely charge up the 'sexual deviants into another frenzy'...they'll be digging new homes underground and taking shelter...;)
     
  3. top gun

    top gun New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    And ASPCA does a GREAT impression of the Sihouette show... LOL!:D

     
  4. Bunz

    Bunz New Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,215
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Alaska
    Good news for them, and NH continues its strong tradition of being personal rights leaders.

    I still dislike this notion of an amendment actually banning this. Bugs me I live in one of the states who passed a ban just over 10 years ago now.
     
  5. top gun

    top gun New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    Messages:
    4,940
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    I agree.

    It gets real tricky when individual states start making rules against a certain singled out group on a civil rights issue.

    And to me (and I'm the least gay person I know:)) this is about equal access to a legal definition.

    The thing I always find is the side that's says let them (them being gay people) have the rights but not call it marriage... never mean that at all. They really mean they want it to be something... but something less than marriage. Because that's reserved for them.

    The very second that they find out it's the exact same piece of paper with a different name at the top, say... Civil Union... that's also signed by a preacher after a ceremony they say... Well hell no! That's just a marriage & a wedding by another name!:eek:

    A yeah that's right...
     
Loading...

Share This Page