mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 18,794
Never mind the fact that democrats, leftists, and the incompetent news media claimed investigators found evidence that Russia hacked the DNC computers and gave stolen emails to Assange. That all turned out to be a lie, but lazy, good-for-nothing leftist Americans don't care if the media lies to them as long as conservatives and Christians are demonized and driven from positions of influence in America.
Democrats hired CrowdStrike to investigate the alleged hacking, refusing to allow the FBI to examine the computers instead. CrowdStrike initially claimed, but did not prove, that some Russian entity hacked the DNC computers and stole the emails. However, under congressional oversight examination, the head of CrowdStrike admitted under oath that they never had evidence of hacking and did not know how the emails were taken from the DNC computers and delivered to Assange.
https://news.iheart.com/featured/ru...-no-proof-the-russians-hacked-the-dnc-server/
This was, again, the firm hired to investigate the Democrat National Committee servers and computer network to find out who did it, to find out who hacked them. The president of CrowdStrike told Schiff's committee they didn't know. They couldn't find out. They couldn't learn. They couldn't say for certain the Russians had hacked the DNC server.
They could not say for sure that the Russians were involved in letting Podesta's emails out. Well, now, folks, for crying out loud, that is only the entire basis for the entire Russian collusion claim! That the FBI was refused permission to see the DNC server, they hired CrowdStrike, CrowdStrike was said to...
They didn't publicly say it, the DNC said this, that the people they had hired, CrowdStrike, demonstrated that their servers were hacked by Russia. And so that was part of this two-year, never-ending pack of lies about this story. It turns out that the president of CrowdStrike couldn't figure out who had hacked the DNC server.
Democrats hired CrowdStrike to investigate the alleged hacking, refusing to allow the FBI to examine the computers instead. CrowdStrike initially claimed, but did not prove, that some Russian entity hacked the DNC computers and stole the emails. However, under congressional oversight examination, the head of CrowdStrike admitted under oath that they never had evidence of hacking and did not know how the emails were taken from the DNC computers and delivered to Assange.
https://news.iheart.com/featured/ru...-no-proof-the-russians-hacked-the-dnc-server/
This was, again, the firm hired to investigate the Democrat National Committee servers and computer network to find out who did it, to find out who hacked them. The president of CrowdStrike told Schiff's committee they didn't know. They couldn't find out. They couldn't learn. They couldn't say for certain the Russians had hacked the DNC server.
They could not say for sure that the Russians were involved in letting Podesta's emails out. Well, now, folks, for crying out loud, that is only the entire basis for the entire Russian collusion claim! That the FBI was refused permission to see the DNC server, they hired CrowdStrike, CrowdStrike was said to...
They didn't publicly say it, the DNC said this, that the people they had hired, CrowdStrike, demonstrated that their servers were hacked by Russia. And so that was part of this two-year, never-ending pack of lies about this story. It turns out that the president of CrowdStrike couldn't figure out who had hacked the DNC server.