Reverse TDS.

[mark francis]

Was? Past tense for something that hasn't happened yet lol
Moron

No, the demented, Trump-despising, political hack Democrat prosecutor has a history of overturned convictions to his credit.

 

[pjmret]

No, the demented, Trump-despising, political hack Democrat prosecutor has a history of overturned convictions to his credit.

Who doesn't have overturned ones duh

What legal basis do you see for overturning all his indictments of trump duh

Ps demented? You are a moron lol

 

[mark francis]

Who doesn't have overturned ones duh

What legal basis do you see for overturning all his indictments of trump duh

Ps demented? You are a moron lol

​

Special Counsel Jack Smith Has History of Botched Prosecutions of Political Leaders

Newly-appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith has a history of botched prosecutions of leading political leaders.

www.breitbart.com

Special Counsel Jack Smith Has History of Botched Prosecutions of Political Leaders​

 

[pjmret]

​

Special Counsel Jack Smith Has History of Botched Prosecutions of Political Leaders

Newly-appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith has a history of botched prosecutions of leading political leaders.

www.breitbart.com

Special Counsel Jack Smith Has History of Botched Prosecutions of Political Leaders​

Breitbart that credible source of legal analysis lol

Quote an actual legal expert who disagrees with trumps indictment

 

[mark francis]

Breitbart that credible source of legal analysis lol

Quote an actual legal expert who disagrees with trumps indictment

Sadly, not a Democrat in the world can refute what Breitbart reported about the partisan hack prosecutor Jack Smith.

 

[pjmret]

Sadly, not a Democrat in the world can refute what Breitbart reported about the partisan hack prosecutor Jack Smith.

Sadly nothing in the story proves Trump is innocent. Lol

 

[pjmret]

Sadly, not a Democrat in the world can refute what Breitbart reported about the partisan hack prosecutor Jack Smith.

The article shows 2 victories, one hung jury, and one overturned. Hardly a history of botched prosecutions lol
So yes I refute it. One overturned is not a history moron lol

 

[mark francis]

Sadly nothing in the story proves Trump is innocent. Lol

We'll see.

 

[mark francis]

The article shows 2 victories, one hung jury, and one overturned. Hardly a history of botched prosecutions lol
So yes I refute it. One overturned is not a history moron lol

Are SCOTUS justices biased? None are as biased as this partisan hack.

 

[pjmret]

Are SCOTUS justices biased? None are as biased as this partisan hack.

Prove it,
How is he a partisan hack?
Where is his legal reasoning wrong?

All you morons have is whining lol

 

[pjmret]

We'll see.

Well yes, but my statement was correct. The story said nothing about Trump being correct and the story was stupid... one overturned case is not a history of botched cases duh. A "history" of... one lol

 

[mark francis]

Prove it,
How is he a partisan hack?
Where is his legal reasoning wrong?

All you morons have is whining lol

I have heard multiple legal experts explain why the charges against Trump are flimsy and partisan.

 

[mark francis]

Well yes, but my statement was correct. The story said nothing about Trump being correct and the story was stupid... one overturned case is not a history of botched cases duh. A "history" of... one lol

Your perception of bias or lack of bias in charges leveled at political opponents seems to be politically biased.

 

[pjmret]

Your perception of bias or lack of bias in charges leveled at political opponents seems to be politically biased.

find me an independent legal expert who says the charges against trump are bogus moron.

if you can't it means the charges are valid and not politically motivated. duh

 

[pjmret]

I have heard multiple legal experts explain why the charges against Trump are flimsy and partisan.

post them moron. they have to be independent ones, not biased ones.