Your logic would have all rapists go free. "They implied consent by being present at the scene of the rape." You logic is fvcked and is based on the false assumptions that I do not rebel.
What an absurd statement...
If someone is raped (ie forced to have non-consensual sex) they clearly have not consented just by being present.
In terms of the government, which we created and give our consent to, they clearly have the power to tax, as spelled out in the Constitution.
You can look at a country in much the same way as club. A club can charge dues, set membership requirements etc...if you don't like the club, you leave the club. Just because you don't like the idea of leaving does not mean the option is not open to you.
If you don't take it, then you are giving your consent to the government to enforce the law... ie you will pay taxes.
I don't view the killing of another human being in cold blood as murder. But does that change what it is? You can call a spade a club but it is still a spade.
Ok.. would you agree that there are times when killing another human being is not murder? If so, then the issue is not black and white...and neither should the issue of "tax is theft" be so black and white.