The Tea Party will change America back to the days of Thomas Jefferson

How quickly we forget the Bush years...I can quickly recall the Bush=Hitler comparisons, Bush being burned in effigy, Bush's head being cut off at mock executions, a video of Bush being assassinated was produced, the list can go on and on...Was the left "unbalanced" because of this?? Or was it simply a few fringe people being idiots?

The fact that it happens to Obama is well is simply that it will happen to ALL Presidents regardless of race or political affiliation. Claiming that this is some new thing just for Obama is to simply ignore reality. If you truly want to be fair and non-partisan here, you will easily accept that this is nothing new.

This is a clear case of proceeding based on bad underlying assumptions...regardless of how you proceed, your conclusion will be wrong.

Absolutely! What is so hard to understand about my not liking that kind of talk and attacks from ANY quarters, especially directed to ANY President!

Did you read the part where I said:
 
Werbung:
How quickly we forget the Bush years...I can quickly recall the Bush=Hitler comparisons, Bush being burned in effigy, Bush's head being cut off at mock executions, a video of Bush being assassinated was produced, the list can go on and on...Was the left "unbalanced" because of this?? Or was it simply a few fringe people being idiots?

The fact that it happens to Obama is well is simply that it will happen to ALL Presidents regardless of race or political affiliation. Claiming that this is some new thing just for Obama is to simply ignore reality. If you truly want to be fair and non-partisan here, you will easily accept that this is nothing new.

This is a clear case of proceeding based on bad underlying assumptions...regardless of how you proceed, your conclusion will be wrong.

Absolutely. . .where did I say otherwise?
Why is it sooooo hard for several people in this forum to understand that I am not in favor of ANY attacks (especially misleading or based on craziness) against anyone, but especially not against ANY President!

Didn't you read this part of my previous post?
"My opinion with all this is, once again, that extremists, making extremist remarks, and using fear mongering that fit their stupidity or ignorance exist in all walks of life, and in all parties.
And. . .two wrong don't make a right!"

What does that tell you? How can you translate that to mean that I approve of attacks from the extreme Left, but not from the extrem Right?
 
Absolutely. . .where did I say otherwise?
Why is it sooooo hard for several people in this forum to understand that I am not in favor of ANY attacks (especially misleading or based on craziness) against anyone, but especially not against ANY President!

Didn't you read this part of my previous post?


What does that tell you? How can you translate that to mean that I approve of attacks from the extreme Left, but not from the extrem Right?

I skipped some of your post, but I agree with this statement.

My response was intended to be more of a generic reply to all, and your post was the one I replied to.
 
Yes, they are unbalanced, just as their counterpart on the Right are unbalanced:

THEY ARE CRAZY...and here is proof:
Quote:


I wonder where Rep Carson got that idea? Could it be here?
Link: Two charged with hanging Obama effigy at Univ. of Kentucky - USA Today
content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2008/10/.../1 - Cached
Oct 31, 2008 – Two men were charged yesterday with hanging an effigy of Obama

Please note, this is only ONE of several incidents of that type.

Quote:


Okay. . .what is so offensive with this comment?
Basically, all this comment says (although in language that may not be easily grasped by 7th grade readers) that the Tea Party has an almost physical aversion to spending! Isn’t that the truth? Isn’t that their self identified main focus? (after “making Obama fail,” of course!)


Quote:


And where did he get this? Maybe from some polls like these ones?
“Yesterday, the 150th anniversary of the beginning of the Civil War, CNN released a poll that showed that 25 percent of the general public and some 40 percent of Southerners sympathize more with the rebellious Confederacy than with the Union. And in a particularly revealing inversion of the historical record--more than half of the Republicans surveyed believe that slavery was not the cause of the Civil War.
Not content to merely support an insurrection against the duly elected government of the United States, 80 percent of the Republicans surveyed by CNN also expressed admiration for the leaders of the South--a cabal whose allegiance to white supremacy was most tellingly summed up by the Vice President of the Confederacy's sentiment that its, "...foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man, that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based on this great physical, philosophical and moral truth.”
Echoing the Tea Party GOP's neo-Confederate longings, last week an equally troubling bit of polling data was released which highlighted how the Right-wing yearns for a return to “tradition” and the “good old days” in the Age of Obama.
Public Policy Polling surveyed self-identified Republican voters in Mississippi. They were asked a series of questions regarding issue positions and their likelihood of voting for a given Republican presidential candidate in the 2012 race. Among their findings: apparently, race still matters to the good Tea Party GOP voters of Mississippi, with 46 percent of the respondents indicating that interracial marriage should be illegal. And in good news for Sarah Palin, those who supported her were significantly more likely to
Link: What Shocking New Polls on Republican Attitudes Toward Slavery ... newstrust.net/stories/5898147 - Cached
Apr 13, 2011 – What Shocking New Polls on Republican Attitudes Toward Slavery, ... In a recent survey, almost half of Mississippi Republican voters polled said ... the field in 2010 and are among the most admired by Tea Party members. ...

Quote:


This is something Breibart would never do, right?
“Tea Party favorite Andrew Breitbartz told a conservative audience in Massachusetts that conservatives outnumber liberals and have most of the guns. He also claimed that the military is ready to take action against liberals if violence ever erupted between liberals and conservatives.
“I’m under attack all the time. They call me gay, there are death threats… There are times where I’m not thinking as clearly as I should, and in those unclear moments, I always think to myself, ‘Fire the first shot.’ Bring it on. Because I know who’s on our side. They can only win a rhetorical and propaganda war. They cannot win. We outnumber them in this country, and we have the guns… I’m not kidding. They talk a mean game, but they will not cross that line because they know what they’re dealing with.
Then he claimed that some senior military officials have personally assured him that they’ll join the right wing in a civil war.”


Quote:



Well, Morgan Freeman is probably a better actor than a politician. . .but at least he is smart!
Now. . .what does Chuck Norris have to say about Obama’s policies?
“It's a well-known fact that Chuck Norris could kick the **** out of the Council of Ephesus, so when he has something to say about the Blessed Virgin Mary, I, for one, listen:
“Lastly, as we near the eve of another Christmas, I wonder: What would have happened if Mother Mary had been covered by Obamacare? What if that young, poor and uninsured teenage woman had been provided the federal funds (via Obamacare) and facilities (via Planned Parenthood, etc.) to avoid the ridicule, ostracizing, persecution and possible stoning because of her out-of-wedlock pregnancy? Imagine all the great souls who could have been erased from history and the influence of mankind if their parents had been as progressive as Washington's wise men and women! Will Obamacare morph into Herodcare for the unborn?” Chuck Norris

Quote:


Interesting! Do you think he may have listened to Glenn Beck once too often and caught the “Nazy bug?”

Beck Compares Obama Administration To Nazis - YouTube
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqXKoql-VnQAug 12, 2009 - 10 min - Uploaded by TheYoungTurks
Link to this comment: Share to: ... Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment! .... Add to. Racist Glenn Beck compares Obama to Hitler and ...


My opinion with all this is, once again, that extremists, making extremist remarks, and using fear mongering that fit their stupidity or ignorance exist in all walks of life, and in all parties.
And. . .two wrong don't make a right!

Most of your response is utter nonsense.

You cite two nuts hanging BO's image in effigy as a reason for a nutty leftists Dem politician claiming the TP wants to hang blacks. Do not see how illogical this is? I would guess not. So, I will explain it for you. Two lone nuts doing something stupid IS NOT THE TEA PARTY!!!! But, apparently you think they are.

Then you compound your illogical thinking by failing to understand your beloved NPR's use of the word "racist" to condemn the TP's desire to stop deficit spending. Do I need to explain? I suppose I do, but I am tiring.

But, it gets worse. You agree with the nutty MSNBC's anchor's hateful editorial just because of a poll. Illogical.

Then to make matters worse...for you...you do not condemn the dumb actors comments, but cite Chuck Norris' aversion to Obummercare. ILLOGICAL!!!!

Because of your lack of logical thinking and liberal partisanship you are incapable of seeing reality. Your side is attacking an entire political PARTY using unfounded accusations.
 
Absolutely. . .where did I say otherwise?
Why is it sooooo hard for several people in this forum to understand that I am not in favor of ANY attacks (especially misleading or based on craziness) against anyone, but especially not against ANY President!

Didn't you read this part of my previous post?


What does that tell you? How can you translate that to mean that I approve of attacks from the extreme Left, but not from the extrem Right?

cartoon_092411_A.jpg
 
Most of your response is utter nonsense.

You cite two nuts hanging BO's image in effigy as a reason for a nutty leftists Dem politician claiming the TP wants to hang blacks. Do not see how illogical this is? I would guess not. So, I will explain it for you. Two lone nuts doing something stupid IS NOT THE TEA PARTY!!!! But, apparently you think they are.

Then you compound your illogical thinking by failing to understand your beloved NPR's use of the word "racist" to condemn the TP's desire to stop deficit spending. Do I need to explain? I suppose I do, but I am tiring.

But, it gets worse. You agree with the nutty MSNBC's anchor's hateful editorial just because of a poll. Illogical.

Then to make matters worse...for you...you do not condemn the dumb actors comments, but cite Chuck Norris' aversion to Obummercare. ILLOGICAL!!!!

Because of your lack of logical thinking and liberal partisanship you are incapable of seeing reality. Your side is attacking an entire political PARTY using unfounded accusations.

There is not much point in trying to explain its about as productive to try and teach your great dane to use a kitty litter box :) Not impossible but really... is it worth it :)
 
The harassment is spreading.

The wolves smell blood!

Oh sweet!

Who is harassing who? We have democrats telling us to "go straight to hell" and that we are "racists" and "bigots". Perhaps if your pals stop the insults and name calling and get back to discussing issues then we can get this country back on solid ground. What do you think?
 
Who is harassing who? We have democrats telling us to "go straight to hell" and that we are "racists" and "bigots". Perhaps if your pals stop the insults and name calling and get back to discussing issues then we can get this country back on solid ground. What do you think?

Agreed, but the Left will never stop the violent rhetoric and name calling. It is all they have. They know they can't win an argument on government spending, increasing government bureaucracy, the unsustainable welfare state, and on and on....

The danger here is the Left will cause or provoke a violent incident and then use the lib media to condemn Rs, TPers, and conservatives for it. That is what could be just around the corner.

Just yesterday BO was inciting black Americans to rise up....CRAZY!

Obama tells blacks to 'stop complainin' and fight
"Take off your bedroom slippers. Put on your marching shoes," he said, his voice rising as applause and cheers mounted. "Shake it off. Stop complainin'. Stop grumblin'. Stop cryin'. We are going to press on. We have work to do."
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-tells-blacks-stop-complainin-fight-015928905.html
 
Originally Posted by Alias
Who is harassing who? We have democrats telling us to "go straight to hell" and that we are "racists" and "bigots". Perhaps if your pals stop the insults and name calling and get back to discussing issues then we can get this country back on solid ground. What do you think?


Don't you know anything? When a lib says something vile and insulting, they are just "disagreeing" and when it is reversed, they are being "attacked".

Wolves coming out? Lol. Tends to happen when fools "cry wolf".
 
This is absurd. ALL personal insults need to stop now. I will be removing posts from this moment on that contain personal attacks.
 
Who is harassing who? We have democrats telling us to "go straight to hell" and that we are "racists" and "bigots". Perhaps if your pals stop the insults and name calling and get back to discussing issues then we can get this country back on solid ground. What do you think?

Could you please post a link for the thread or post where I told ANYONE to "go straight to hell," and called any individual "RACIST" or "Bigot?"
 
Werbung:
Back
Top