Where Would We Be, Without Democratic Economies?????

Massive voting fraud evidence has still not been satisfactorily refuted and much evidence of 2020 fraud can no longer be refuted. Democrats blow smoke to cover up the fact that so much evidence of voting fraud has never been refuted.
Piss off idiot. You're like a cracked record. Same old bullshit. You must be a pain in the arse to live with.

Blame god as you usually do.
 
Werbung:
Massive voting fraud evidence has still not been satisfactorily refuted and much evidence of 2020 fraud can no longer be refuted. Democrats blow smoke to cover up the fact that so much evidence of voting fraud has never been refuted.
Intelligent people understand there is no need to refute bs
You aren't in that group obviously
 
Piss off idiot. You're like a cracked record. Same old bullshit. You must be a pain in the arse to live with.

Blame god as you usually do.
Democrats have committed voting fraud for decades. Democrats warned that voting machines could be corrupted to flip votes in elections and now Democrats are adamantly claiming voting machines did flip votes in elections. So much for the looting lying leftists who claim voting machine fraud in 2020 was not possible.

Smartmatic software flipped the 2004 Venezuelan election from 40- 60 (Chavez loses) to 60 – 40 (Chavez won) | The Wentworth Report 11-20-20

Smartmatic software flipped the 2004 Venezuelan election from 40- 60 (Chavez loses) to 60 – 40 (Chavez won). By Monica Showalter.

Flipped votes in computer systems? The last time we heard about that was in Venezuela’s 2004 fraud-plagued recall referendum on then-President Hugo Chavez.

Millions and millions of Venezuelans marched in the streets against him , and then when the recall referendum was held, it failed hugely, something that seemed very strange given the size of the crowds.

That was the fiasco that official election observer Jimmy Carter praised so highly as free and fair “despite what went on in the totalization room” according to the Carter Center report.
+++++++++++++++++++++


https://www.computerworld.com/artic...ping--an-e-voting-problem-or-user-error-.html 11-8-06
Update: Is 'vote flipping' an e-voting problem or user error?
Do e-voting machines mistakenly give votes to the wrong candidates?
By Todd R. Weiss
Writer, Computerworld | NOV 8, 2006 12:00 AM PST

During Tuesday's midterm elections in the U.S., reports emerged from across the nation about a potential problem called "vote flipping," where a voter selected a candidate on e-voting hardware and the machine counted the vote for an opposing candidate.

The problem has been reported in U.S. elections since 2004 as states move to e-voting in an effort to make the vote-counting process more accurate. Instead, for many Americans, the change has led to more questions than answers, and suspicions that their votes aren't being counted correctly.
++++++++++++++++++

Some Voting Machines Are Flipping Votes But That Doesn't Mean The Election Is 'Rigged' : NPR 10-26-16

Some Machines Are Flipping Votes, But That Doesn't Mean They're Rigged

October 26, 20161:13 PM ET
By
Pam Fessler
Instructions for electronic touch-screen voting machines in Illinois in 2006.

Vote flipping. The stories and conspiracy theories have begun.

In every recent election, there have been reports of voters pressing one candidate's name on a touch-screen machine, only to have the opponent's name light up instead.

It can be unnerving for voters and often leads to allegations that the machines have been "rigged" to favor one candidate over another.
++++++++++++++++++++++


Pennsylvania county promises accurate tally after clerical error appears to flip votes for judges - ABC News (go.com) 11-7-23
Pennsylvania county promises accurate tally after clerical error appears to flip votes for judges

A clerical error in an eastern Pennsylvania county caused votes to appear to be flipped on a ballot question that asked whether a pair of incumbent state appeals judges should be retained

ByMICHAEL RUBINKAM Associated Press

November 7, 2023, 3:37 PM
 
Intelligent people understand there is no need to refute bs
You aren't in that group obviously
The best response Democrats can hope for: Piss off if you refuse to believe the 2020 election was the safest and most accurate election in history. Everybody knows there was no fraud and that it would be a colossal waste of time and money to investigate allegations of fraud, so we refuse to prove anything. We don't care if you do not take our word for it because you don't really matter anyway.
 
The best response Democrats can hope for: Piss off if you refuse to believe the 2020 election was the safest and most accurate election in history. Everybody knows there was no fraud and that it would be a colossal waste of time and money to investigate allegations of fraud, so we refuse to prove anything. We don't care if you do not take our word for it because you don't really matter anyway.
No the best response is that you lost every court case lol
 
Democrats have committed voting fraud for decades. Democrats warned that voting machines could be corrupted to flip votes in elections and now Democrats are adamantly claiming voting machines did flip votes in elections. So much for the looting lying leftists who claim voting machine fraud in 2020 was not possible.

Smartmatic software flipped the 2004 Venezuelan election from 40- 60 (Chavez loses) to 60 – 40 (Chavez won) | The Wentworth Report 11-20-20

Smartmatic software flipped the 2004 Venezuelan election from 40- 60 (Chavez loses) to 60 – 40 (Chavez won). By Monica Showalter.

Flipped votes in computer systems? The last time we heard about that was in Venezuela’s 2004 fraud-plagued recall referendum on then-President Hugo Chavez.

Millions and millions of Venezuelans marched in the streets against him , and then when the recall referendum was held, it failed hugely, something that seemed very strange given the size of the crowds.

That was the fiasco that official election observer Jimmy Carter praised so highly as free and fair “despite what went on in the totalization room” according to the Carter Center report.
+++++++++++++++++++++


https://www.computerworld.com/artic...ping--an-e-voting-problem-or-user-error-.html 11-8-06
Update: Is 'vote flipping' an e-voting problem or user error?
Do e-voting machines mistakenly give votes to the wrong candidates?
By Todd R. Weiss
Writer, Computerworld | NOV 8, 2006 12:00 AM PST

During Tuesday's midterm elections in the U.S., reports emerged from across the nation about a potential problem called "vote flipping," where a voter selected a candidate on e-voting hardware and the machine counted the vote for an opposing candidate.

The problem has been reported in U.S. elections since 2004 as states move to e-voting in an effort to make the vote-counting process more accurate. Instead, for many Americans, the change has led to more questions than answers, and suspicions that their votes aren't being counted correctly.
++++++++++++++++++

Some Voting Machines Are Flipping Votes But That Doesn't Mean The Election Is 'Rigged' : NPR 10-26-16

Some Machines Are Flipping Votes, But That Doesn't Mean They're Rigged

October 26, 20161:13 PM ET
By
Pam Fessler
Instructions for electronic touch-screen voting machines in Illinois in 2006.

Vote flipping. The stories and conspiracy theories have begun.

In every recent election, there have been reports of voters pressing one candidate's name on a touch-screen machine, only to have the opponent's name light up instead.

It can be unnerving for voters and often leads to allegations that the machines have been "rigged" to favor one candidate over another.
++++++++++++++++++++++


Pennsylvania county promises accurate tally after clerical error appears to flip votes for judges - ABC News (go.com) 11-7-23
Pennsylvania county promises accurate tally after clerical error appears to flip votes for judges

A clerical error in an eastern Pennsylvania county caused votes to appear to be flipped on a ballot question that asked whether a pair of incumbent state appeals judges should be retained

ByMICHAEL RUBINKAM Associated Press

November 7, 2023, 3:37 PM
Same old shit. You have verbal diarrhoea.
 
No the best response is that you lost every court case lol
You don't know what you are talking about. No voting fraud evidence had first been thoroughly examined before being brought to court, leaving judges no recourse other than to reject the cases for lack of investigative evidence.
 
You don't know what you are talking about. No voting fraud evidence had first been thoroughly examined before being brought to court, leaving judges no recourse other than to reject the cases for lack of investigative evidence.
Why didn't republican morons do that first?
We're they lazy or stupid or both ?
 
Democrats have been committing fraud and lying about it for more than 100 years.
Good. As long as they beat republicans it's ok by me. Suck it up princess.

Btw. Have a read of this. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

And this.

No. Tell me it isn't true. A godbothering republican involved in fraud.

Oops. It seems it's quite common.

Oh stop it Boris. It's beginning to prove you're a liar.
 
Good. As long as they beat republicans it's ok by me. Suck it up princess.
You reveal the foundational thinking of all leftist looting loonies who commit voter fraud for the Democrat party. They believe they do good, no matter whether illegal, immoral, or unjust, as long as they advance the Democrat party against Americans opposed to leftist liberalism.

1699798167473.png
 
Werbung:
Back
Top