Al Gore Lies About Gloabl Warming Scandal

Global warming is just a hoax, you know, and the end goal is a world socialist government.
That's telling those nutty teabagging birthers!!

As if anyone could take seriously the notion of Global Warming being used as an excuse to further the Socialist agenda on a global scale...


title.png

Global warming and capitalism
By Joseph Tanniru

The continuing struggle for world power among capitalist nations will have a profoundly disastrous effect on the environment. Within the capitalist system, there is no possibility of dealing seriously with problems of the environment. It is not ethical maturity that is required, but rather the solidarity of the international working class in the struggle for socialism and an internationally planned economy. Only in this way can the crisis of global warming be addressed in a rational manner and a catastrophe for civilization be averted.
 
Werbung:
That's telling those nutty teabagging birthers!!

As if anyone could take seriously the notion of Global Warming being used as an excuse to further the Socialist agenda on a global scale...

Why would you quote a socialist website? Do you believe they are telling the truth? Why?
 
Re: Al Gore Did Lie About Global Warming

Exhibit 5:

Well the graph below is typical although it's for Mauna Lao and
the data may have been tampered with by Climate scientists.

This plot shows some fits but not the data. If you want to discuss this, what is Mauna Lao (a volcano?), where did you get this plot, and where is the data behind the fits?

When we look at temperature in the last ten years it has decreased and appears to trending downward, but it should have continued increasing? Or did the global greenhouse go out of order for the past ten years?

http://i47.tinypic.com/2rrmdlj.jpg

Clearly you use a different definition of down than I do. Using my definition of down, I see no trend at all over the last ten years, just a lot of noise.


If you study these global temperature graphs you see a typical sine wave pattern
so we are probably heading downward in temperature for a couple more years now
if we extrapolate the data!

You have no way of predicting this. Temperature changes over small numbers of years are essentially random.


Mr. Sheep - You links have Wikipedia in the URLs and we can't rely on them although I looked.


One did not specify a source and it actually shows temperature decreasing after 2000!


Look at the bottom of the page: "This image shows the instrumental record of global average w:temperatures as compiled by the w:NASA's w:Goddard Institute for Space Studies. The data set used follows the methodology outlined by Hansen, J., et al. (2006) "Global temperature change". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103: 14288-14293." Don't argue with Wikipedia, argue with NASA/Hansen et al.

Note below how temperature decreased from 1998 to 2008

You picked the warmest year in history to start from (caused by El Nino), and end with a year that had a downward fluctuation in temperatures. That is pure data manipulation. Why didn't you compare 1997 and 2007 to prove that the globe is warming at a catastrophic rate? That would be equally deceptive.

The other shows satellite temperature mixed in which is fishy.

What do you mean "mixed". The satellite data was analyzed two different ways, leading to consistent results, which were both drawn on the graph. Why is that fishy, they clearly explained this in the caption? You'll have to give me some real reason why I shouldn't trust these measurements other than that wikipedia posted them or that you haven't read enough to understand them.

Have you ever seen that Al Gore Movie that is full of convenient lies?

"Lies" is a strong word, but it is very deceptive and I agree that you really shouldn't trust it. If you want to discuss global warming we can do that, but I really don't care about Al Gore.
 
Asur, I've seen a few rebuttals in scientific journals of the assertion that those stolen (and they were STOLEN) email communications from the East Anglia servers prove there is a conspiracy but I think these videos put the issue in clear perspective.

If you think the response is terse, it's to be expected. I think the entire scientific community is aghast that there are political forces that would either hire computer hitmen to steal personal property, whether it be data or communications or accept their stolen fodder and use it unquestioningly. We would not accept this in cell biology research either.
Well, in this instance karmic intervention had the last word however, because the deniers have not only felony egg on their face, but now look like a bunch of buffoons for trying to sell the public the equivalent of the Brooklyn Bridge.

I'd be interested in seeing your response to these:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P70SlEqX7oY&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJFZ88EH6i4&feature=player_embedded
 
That's telling those nutty teabagging birthers!!

As if anyone could take seriously the notion of Global Warming being used as an excuse to further the Socialist agenda on a global scale...

See! That proves it. Global warming is a conspiracy, even the socialists themselves admit it. It is just as much of a conspiracy as the other ten I linked to.
 
If global warming was really as bad as they say...you would think the idiots that flew to Copenhagen would have found a more environmental friendly way of holding the conference.

But of course, they did not. They just flew these jets and drove these lmiousines and tore up the environment.

It's a joke, a hoax and nothing more than a way to try and control people.
 
If global warming was really as bad as they say...you would think the idiots that flew to Copenhagen would have found a more environmental friendly way of holding the conference.

But of course, they did not. They just flew these jets and drove these lmiousines and tore up the environment.

It's a joke, a hoax and nothing more than a way to try and control people.

You seem to be grasping at straws there, Chest.
 
Mr. Sheep - I don't want to argue but I won't duck questions, like Climate Hoaxers do!
Let me answer you before we proceed on to new exhibits!

Mr. Sheep - Mauna Lao is part of Hawaii, surrounded by lots of water! (Think Poles)

Mr. Sheep - Wikipedia should be your last resort to pull data from. It's a human edited directory, full of liberal misinformation. Just pull the NASA charts directly or provide links to official sources OK?

Mr. Sheep wrote -
You have no way of predicting this. Temperature changes over small numbers of years are essentially random.
Yes, we can't guarantee the global temperature will drop again. No man one can guarantee the future.
But isn't that what Climate Hoaxer's do?
They threaten us if we don't act all the Polar Bears will die and humanity also!


Political scientists attempt to predict the future, with existing data, logic, mathematical extrapolation, trends, etc.
But if you look at the chart below you might see a sine wave so familiar in climate graphs.
Using common sense, my best guess is that next year the global termperature will decline!

Mr. Sheep wrote -
Why didn't you compare 1997 and 2007 to prove that the globe is warming at a catastrophic rate?

OK Lets use Dec 1997 - Dec 2007/2008, but lets use a more detailed chart!
Lets examine different months and different months can give different results!
Just connect the dots and you create black downward trend lines. although it's tricky to
pinpoint the years in this chart!
e1cdft.jpg


The trend appears to exist primarily in the last 10 years. The last ten years
have been a nightmare for the Global Hoaxers, because like I said, you can't hide heat without fudging data! Ie. ClimateGate
So where did the heat go between 1997 and 2008, you never answered my questions?

Mr. Sheep wrote -
What do you mean "mixed".
I prefer one mode of measuring, either land or satellite is all.
It just seems fishy to mix them up is all.


To Be Continued:
 
Mr. Sheep - I don't want to argue but I won't duck questions, like Climate Hoaxers do!
Let me answer you before we proceed on to new exhibits!

Mr. Sheep - Mauna Lao is part of Hawaii, surrounded by lots of water! (Think Poles)

I will be happy to discuss your CO2 plot if you explain it.

Mr. Sheep - Wikipedia should be your last resort to pull data from. It's a human edited directory, full of liberal misinformation. Just pull the NASA charts directly or provide links to official sources OK?

Ok, whatever, let's use the NASA site directly. In return, could you please give references to your own data?

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/
Fig.A.lrg.gif


Political scientists attempt to predict the future, with existing data, logic, mathematical extrapolation, trends, etc.
But if you look at the chart below you might see a sine wave so familiar in climate graphs.

I feel no more inclination to discuss this than to discuss the faces people see in clouds in the sky.


Mr. Sheep wrote -

OK Lets use Dec 1997 - Dec 2007/2008, but lets use a more detailed chart!

Since I destroyed your argument that you can discredit global warming by cherry picking the two most deceptive years in modern history, you are now switching to months. Stop moving the goalposts. I showed you that 1997 was colder than 2007 according to the NASA data. The month of December is irrelevant, and I'm scared to respond to it because I don't know if you're going to start discussing December 16 at 4pm eastern time next. Does the warming between 1997 and 2007 prove anything? No, it just shows how the temperatures fluctuated these two years. This should be easy to understand. For the last time: Any trends you are seeing in the last ten years are like the faces someone sees in clouds. All the up and down motion we can see looks exactly like noise. You have eyes, can you really not see this?
 
It's a joke, a hoax and nothing more than a way to try and control people.
"...control..." people??

For what reason???? :confused:

You Luddites always do this....accusing others o' trying to control people, yet....you consistently-fail to take the next step....explaining WHY (you think) they're trying to control people.

Lemme guess.....it's got something-to-do with Evil, right?

:rolleyes:
 
You seem to be grasping at straws there, Chest.
Did you see the article? Do you realize how hypocritical they are?

It's insane.

And now Al Gore was caught in a lie at the Copenhagen Summit about the melting polar ice caps. This get's richer and richer. 'IT'S A FREAKIN!!! HOAX'

For some reason the liberals think everyone wants to drive a prius, have only one child, and become a vegetarian. What happened to choice?

We live in AMERICA!!! Soldiers have died in many a battle so we can live our lives without the govt intruding. I don't need the govts help and I don't want the gobvts help. When I have a problem I figure it out. If not, then I fail.. I failed in the past... started over and was better for it.

This country has too many people who just want the "instant gratification". That is, they don't want to work to get things or work to fix their own problems. They just want them solved. It's something the democrats push as often as they can.
 
And it gets better and better.

IForecast for Copenhagen
issued Tuesday December 15 at 11:30 hours




Wednesday
Cloudy with heavy snowfall. Maximum day temperatures around 2 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 3 degrees Celsius. Up to fresh wind.


Thursday
Cloudy with a little snow. Maximum day temperatures around minus 1 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 7 degrees Celsius. Up to strong wind.


Friday
Sunny spells. Maximum day temperatures around minus 3 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 12 degrees Celsius. Up to fresh wind.


Saturday
Cloudy weather. Maximum day temperatures around 0 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 2 degrees Celsius. Up to fresh wind.


Sunday
Cloudy with some snow. Maximum day temperatures around 1 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 3 degrees Celsius. Up to fresh wind.
 
And it gets better and better.

IForecast for Copenhagen
issued Tuesday December 15 at 11:30 hours




Wednesday
Cloudy with heavy snowfall. Maximum day temperatures around 2 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 3 degrees Celsius. Up to fresh wind.


Thursday
Cloudy with a little snow. Maximum day temperatures around minus 1 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 7 degrees Celsius. Up to strong wind.


Friday
Sunny spells. Maximum day temperatures around minus 3 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 12 degrees Celsius. Up to fresh wind.


Saturday
Cloudy weather. Maximum day temperatures around 0 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 2 degrees Celsius. Up to fresh wind.


Sunday
Cloudy with some snow. Maximum day temperatures around 1 degrees Celsius, minimum night temperatures around minus 3 degrees Celsius. Up to fresh wind.

Oh, yes, Al Gore, serious scientist that he is, is fibbing about how fast the Arctic ice is melting.

Here's the real story:

In a year when the Arctic ice cap has shrunk to the lowest level ever recorded, a new analysis from Seattle scientists says global warming will accelerate future melting much more than previously expected.

About 40 percent of the floating ice that normally blankets the top of the world during the summer will be gone by 2050, says James Overland, an oceanographer at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory. Earlier studies had predicted it would be nearly a century before that much ice vanished.

So, Dr. Gore, Phd, the scientist who has spent a lifetime researching global climate change, has the timeline wrong.

And to further prove that global warming is a hoax, it's cold in Denmark.

If you want further proof, go to Michigan. It's cold there, too, a lot colder than it was just a few short months ago.

There you have it. Proof that global warming is a hoax.
 
Werbung:
RAl Gore Lies About Global Warming Scandal

Mr. Sheep - I provided two distinct examples of temperature decreasing over the last 10 years. One was enough, because if global temperatures declined, there needs to be an explanation as to why? Fortunately we have this data now and even if we didn't, it wouldn't mean that man-made Global Warming isn't a Hoax. It is a hoax either way, but the data above makes it easier to prove.

I was awaiting an answer from you Mr. Sheep, but you came up with none!

Exhibit 6: A Convenient Lie (Al Gore)

American schools might be teaching it as fact, but Britain has found problems with it.


Mr. Justice Burton (Britain) said Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth, was 'one-sided' and would breach education rules unless accompanied by a warning.

Despite winning praise from the hoaxers Mr Gore's documentary was found to contain 'nine scientific errors' by the judge, not just little old asur.

And guess what, all these errors were in the Hoaxer's favor, so they were not random, but conveniently in the the Snake Oil Salesman's favor!


t8nrbo.jpg


To be honest, I'm not crazy about this exhibit but I am
interested in another major problem with his movie!

Now lets explore that one problem in particular.
To be continued:
 
Back
Top