Another liberal stupid plan backfires in the liberal paradise

Werbung:
hey TAT, still using a rotary dial phone? lol.

new technology always has issues, and always will.

but stick to black and white tvs if you want "tried and true" tech!
 
hey TAT, still using a rotary dial phone? lol.

new technology always has issues, and always will.

but stick to black and white tvs if you want "tried and true" tech!
Have you answered the call for more monetary support for failing green energy companies?

Biden Admin Approved Huge Loan To Green Company As It Was Allegedly Defrauding Investors. Now Its Stock Is Tanking | The Daily Caller 11-16-23

Biden Admin Approved Huge Loan To Green Company As It Was Allegedly Defrauding Investors. Now Its Stock Is Tanking

November 16, 20232:06 PM ET

The Biden administration authorized a battery recycling company to receive a massive taxpayer-funded loan for a New York facility in February 2023, months after the company had allegedly started to defraud investors.

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Loan Programs Office (LPO) and its director, Jigar Shah, pushed Li-Cycle, a company now in dire financial condition, to apply for a LPO loan to help build its Rochester, New York, facility as early as September 2022, according to The Wall Street Journal. The DOE announced its conditional commitment to loaning $375 million to the company in February 2023, just months after Shah’s meeting.

However, in a class-action lawsuit, investors are now accusing the firm of making false statements or withholding key information about the status of the Rochester facility starting as early as June 2022, months before the reported discussions about the loan or the announcement of conditional approval. The company announced on Oct. 23 that it had paused construction on the Rochester facility.
Li-Cycle now finds itself in poor financial shape; its stock, down more than 88% year-to-date, currently trades at about 70 cents per share, according to data from Google Finance. Its third quarter earnings report shows that the firm took a quarterly net loss of $130.5 million, managed to generate just $4.5 million of revenue and now appears to be on the hook for up to $350 million in total debt, according to Stock Analysis.

It remains unclear when or if construction will resume on the Rochester project, but some analysts are highly doubtful that the facility will ever become operational.
 
Have you answered the call for more monetary support for failing green energy companies?

Biden Admin Approved Huge Loan To Green Company As It Was Allegedly Defrauding Investors. Now Its Stock Is Tanking | The Daily Caller 11-16-23

Biden Admin Approved Huge Loan To Green Company As It Was Allegedly Defrauding Investors. Now Its Stock Is Tanking

November 16, 20232:06 PM ET

The Biden administration authorized a battery recycling company to receive a massive taxpayer-funded loan for a New York facility in February 2023, months after the company had allegedly started to defraud investors.

The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Loan Programs Office (LPO) and its director, Jigar Shah, pushed Li-Cycle, a company now in dire financial condition, to apply for a LPO loan to help build its Rochester, New York, facility as early as September 2022, according to The Wall Street Journal. The DOE announced its conditional commitment to loaning $375 million to the company in February 2023, just months after Shah’s meeting.

However, in a class-action lawsuit, investors are now accusing the firm of making false statements or withholding key information about the status of the Rochester facility starting as early as June 2022, months before the reported discussions about the loan or the announcement of conditional approval. The company announced on Oct. 23 that it had paused construction on the Rochester facility.
Li-Cycle now finds itself in poor financial shape; its stock, down more than 88% year-to-date, currently trades at about 70 cents per share, according to data from Google Finance. Its third quarter earnings report shows that the firm took a quarterly net loss of $130.5 million, managed to generate just $4.5 million of revenue and now appears to be on the hook for up to $350 million in total debt, according to Stock Analysis.

It remains unclear when or if construction will resume on the Rochester project, but some analysts are highly doubtful that the facility will ever become operational.
have you?
 
have you?
Not at all. Let all the Solendras and other Democrat boondoggles collapse. Unlike real jobs and businesses, Democrat government created jobs and businesses can usually not stay in business anyway without massive government funding.
 
Not at all. Let all the Solendras and other Democrat boondoggles collapse. Unlike real jobs and businesses, Democrat government created jobs and businesses can usually not stay in business anyway without massive government funding.

how many businesses have dems funded and how many didn't stay in business?
lets see if you now anything except whining.
i doubt you do. lol
 
how many businesses have dems funded and how many didn't stay in business?
lets see if you now anything except whining.
i doubt you do. lol
You are asking a lot. The US government has funded so many businesses, foundations, projects, and the like that we can never begin to list them all. Businesses were partially funded, majorly funded, and funded through other government funding programs which cloud those funding issues from most Americans. Let's just look at a few under Obama, like Solyndra, that failed spectacularly.

Obama's alternative energy bankruptcies (cnn.com) 10-22-12
Obama's alternative energy bankruptcies

by Steve Hargreaves @hargreavesCNNOctober 22, 2012: 11:16 PM ET

President Obama has faced a barrage of criticism for a handful of energy companies that went bankrupt after receiving government funding.

President Obama is getting hammered for funding renewable energy companies that have since gone belly up.

During the first presidential debate, Mitt Romney said "about half" of the companies funded by Obama's administration went bankrupt. That is true -- for just the first two years of the program that supported Solyndra, which the campaign later clarified. (See correction below).

10 most expensive energy projects in the world ...

So just how many federally-funded energy companies have failed?

A total of five have gone bankrupt, according to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. All of the failed companies that the Committee identified came from just two programs that received significant dollar amounts from the Department of Energy. ...

While other departments within the government have given money to renewable energy firms, some of which may have also gone bankrupt, the bulk of the funds were administered by the Energy Department.

The companies -- and what became of taxpayer money -- are as follows:

A123: The battery maker received a $249 million Department of Energy stimulus grant to build two factories in Michigan to manufacture batteries for electric cars.

The company drew down $132 million of that grant, and the factories are up and running, according to the DOE.

As part of A123's bankruptcy announced earlier this week, the factories were sold to Johnson Controls (JCI), which is expected to keep them open. Since the investment was a grant, the government got no money back. It's unclear whether Johnson will be eligible to draw down the remaining grant funds.

Abound Solar: The manufacturer of thin-film solar panels received a $400 million DOE stimulus loan guarantee to build two factories -- one outside Kokomo, Indiana and another outside of Denver.

Abound drew down $70 million of the grant to build the Denver factory. Abound declared bankruptcy in June amid strong competition and the collapsing price of solar panels.

Its assets are being auctioned off, and DOE is expected to lose to $40 to $60 million on the deal.

Beacon Power: The company received a $43 million DOE stimulus loan guarantee to build a facility in upstate New York that uses flywheels to store extra energy from the power grid, and then release it when needed. Such technology is seen as essential to integrate wind and solar into the grid, as those sources don't produce energy 24/7.

The company spent $39 million to build the project, which consists of wheels inside vacuum tubes that can spin at near perpetual motion. Beacon went bankrupt amid low prices for natural gas, which can be burned to produce electricity.

The flywheel plant was sold to a competitor, and DOE is slated to receive at least $27 million in the deal.

Ener1: A subsidiary of the company, EnerDel, received an $118.5 million grant to build two plants outside Indianapolis to manufacture batteries for electric cars and other uses.

Ener1 declared bankruptcy in January, and the company was bought by a Russian investor. The plants in Indianapolis continue to make batteries.

Solyndra: The manufacturer of advanced solar panels received a $535 million loan guarantee to build a factory outside of San Francisco.

Solyndra went bankrupt in 2011 amid falling prices for solar panels, and has since served as the poster child for well-meaning government policy gone bad.

Its assets are being auctioned off, and DOE is not expected to recover any meaningful amount of money.

Related: Obama vs. Romney: 9 energy flashpoints

The House Committee also pointed to two other DOE-funded companies that have made negative headlines as of late, but are still in businesses.

Fisker Automotive: The electric car maker received a $529 million DOE-backed stimulus loan to design a mid-priced model and build a factory to manufacture the vehicle in Delaware.

In February, Fisker put the manufacture of the sedan on hold amid lower than expected demand for electric cars and announced layoffs, though still says it plans on building the car in 2014. The company has drawn down about $200 million of the loan.

The future of rechargeable batteries

Nevada Geothermal Power: The firm received a $98 million DOE-backed loan to build a geothermal power plant north of Reno.

According to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, an internal audit of the firm revealed $98 million in net losses and significant debt.

DOE says the power plant the loan built has a long-term agreement to sell electricity, and its investment will be protected no matter what happens to the parent company.

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated how Romney described the bankrupt companies during the debate. The campaign later clarified that Romney was referring to the first two years of the 1705 loan program when he said "about half" went bankrupt. Romney did not qualify the statement during the debate.

CNNMoney (New York)First published October 22, 2012: 6:03 AM E
 
You are asking a lot. The US government has funded so many businesses, foundations, projects, and the like that we can never begin to list them all. Businesses were partially funded, majorly funded, and funded through other government funding programs which cloud those funding issues from most Americans. Let's just look at a few under Obama, like Solyndra, that failed spectacularly.

Obama's alternative energy bankruptcies (cnn.com) 10-22-12
Obama's alternative energy bankruptcies

by Steve Hargreaves @hargreavesCNNOctober 22, 2012: 11:16 PM ET

President Obama has faced a barrage of criticism for a handful of energy companies that went bankrupt after receiving government funding.

President Obama is getting hammered for funding renewable energy companies that have since gone belly up.

During the first presidential debate, Mitt Romney said "about half" of the companies funded by Obama's administration went bankrupt. That is true -- for just the first two years of the program that supported Solyndra, which the campaign later clarified. (See correction below).

10 most expensive energy projects in the world ...

So just how many federally-funded energy companies have failed?

A total of five have gone bankrupt, according to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. All of the failed companies that the Committee identified came from just two programs that received significant dollar amounts from the Department of Energy. ...

While other departments within the government have given money to renewable energy firms, some of which may have also gone bankrupt, the bulk of the funds were administered by the Energy Department.

The companies -- and what became of taxpayer money -- are as follows:

A123: The battery maker received a $249 million Department of Energy stimulus grant to build two factories in Michigan to manufacture batteries for electric cars.

The company drew down $132 million of that grant, and the factories are up and running, according to the DOE.

As part of A123's bankruptcy announced earlier this week, the factories were sold to Johnson Controls (JCI), which is expected to keep them open. Since the investment was a grant, the government got no money back. It's unclear whether Johnson will be eligible to draw down the remaining grant funds.

Abound Solar: The manufacturer of thin-film solar panels received a $400 million DOE stimulus loan guarantee to build two factories -- one outside Kokomo, Indiana and another outside of Denver.

Abound drew down $70 million of the grant to build the Denver factory. Abound declared bankruptcy in June amid strong competition and the collapsing price of solar panels.

Its assets are being auctioned off, and DOE is expected to lose to $40 to $60 million on the deal.

Beacon Power: The company received a $43 million DOE stimulus loan guarantee to build a facility in upstate New York that uses flywheels to store extra energy from the power grid, and then release it when needed. Such technology is seen as essential to integrate wind and solar into the grid, as those sources don't produce energy 24/7.

The company spent $39 million to build the project, which consists of wheels inside vacuum tubes that can spin at near perpetual motion. Beacon went bankrupt amid low prices for natural gas, which can be burned to produce electricity.

The flywheel plant was sold to a competitor, and DOE is slated to receive at least $27 million in the deal.

Ener1: A subsidiary of the company, EnerDel, received an $118.5 million grant to build two plants outside Indianapolis to manufacture batteries for electric cars and other uses.

Ener1 declared bankruptcy in January, and the company was bought by a Russian investor. The plants in Indianapolis continue to make batteries.

Solyndra: The manufacturer of advanced solar panels received a $535 million loan guarantee to build a factory outside of San Francisco.

Solyndra went bankrupt in 2011 amid falling prices for solar panels, and has since served as the poster child for well-meaning government policy gone bad.

Its assets are being auctioned off, and DOE is not expected to recover any meaningful amount of money.

Related: Obama vs. Romney: 9 energy flashpoints

The House Committee also pointed to two other DOE-funded companies that have made negative headlines as of late, but are still in businesses.

Fisker Automotive: The electric car maker received a $529 million DOE-backed stimulus loan to design a mid-priced model and build a factory to manufacture the vehicle in Delaware.

In February, Fisker put the manufacture of the sedan on hold amid lower than expected demand for electric cars and announced layoffs, though still says it plans on building the car in 2014. The company has drawn down about $200 million of the loan.

The future of rechargeable batteries

Nevada Geothermal Power: The firm received a $98 million DOE-backed loan to build a geothermal power plant north of Reno.

According to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, an internal audit of the firm revealed $98 million in net losses and significant debt.

DOE says the power plant the loan built has a long-term agreement to sell electricity, and its investment will be protected no matter what happens to the parent company.

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated how Romney described the bankrupt companies during the debate. The campaign later clarified that Romney was referring to the first two years of the 1705 loan program when he said "about half" went bankrupt. Romney did not qualify the statement during the debate.

CNNMoney (New York)First published October 22, 2012: 6:03 AM E
i am asking you to prove your whining.
now you are whining again. lol.
if you dont want to prove your whining, either stop whining or just accept looking stupid.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top