You must be completely stupid because the full quote does absolutely nothing to change its meaning in regards to the context. If you claim it does THEN SPECIFICALLY EXPLAIN WHY.
I already explained why, and if you'd taken the time to read it, you'd have seen it. (don't you just hate it when people use your own BS against you?)
You lying fraud. Any time I've talked about the Constitution, I've backed it up - to the "General Welfare" Clause, to the standing army/foreign policy issue, to the money system.
Your statements concerning the monetary system are utterly flawed as you insist on saying that anything other than coins are "fiat money" and ignore the fact that "Securities" (that's the paper money) is specifically listed. You have most pointedly ignored the fact that the Continental Congress authorized the printing of paper money in 1776, and that we've had paper money ever since. Your unfounded assertions concerning OIF and GWOT are also historically without merit, as I showed earlier, in that 3 of the first 4 Presidents of the United States, all men who directly helped found this nations, sent our troops abroad, to war, without a formal "declaration of war".
No, it's not a Straw Man, liar, if you're claiming that the arguments aren't valid because they're copy & pasted. If you aren't claiming that, then your statement is absolutely meaningless and proves nothing. Would you like to EXPLAIN SPECIFICALLY what your meaning is?
Oh goody, the "liar, liar, pants on fire" defense,
again. Perhaps you've allowed your emotions to interfere with your reading comprehension? I never said that your posts were invalid because you C&P'd them, I said that it showed a lack of intellectual ability on your part because you consistently fail to make a cogent argument ON YOUR OWN. Making an argument, and using
primary sources in support of your argument is all well and good, but you don't do that, you simply present someone else's work, and say "I like what he/she says". That's cutting a fine edge on PLAGIARISM, only you've at least not tried to claim it was your work. The biggest problem is that you're attempting to present an Op Ed as if it were a primary source, and therefore some kind of proof of something other than an opinion. It's not. An Op Ed is just that, an "opinion" and not proof of anything. If you want to present "proof" in support of your position, try using
primary sources (like the ones I've presented).
ROTFL. First of all, before you accuse someone of committing a fallacy, at least learn how to spell it. And don't try to claim a typing error because you did it twice in a row. It's
"fallacies," Einstein. Keep pwning yourself, gramps. It's fun to watch you unravel.
You're obviously getting desperate now. Resorting to the old "spell check" Police tactic when you can't make an argument. Perhaps you'd like me to go back through your posts and present your spelling errors. This is getting sad.
Claiming something isn't true or isn't accurate because it's copy & pasted - or if that isn't your meaning, claiming someone cannot be logical if they present information from another source.
See above.
You won't provide any specifics. You run away from specific evidence that refutes your irrational beliefs. If you claim that an argument is flawed, then produce and present your syllogism refuting it.
I have provided ample specific primary sources for my information, which prove that your assertions are flawed, you simply ignore them and do that silly little "block and bridge" thing. It is you who consistently refuses to provide specific primary sources, and instead rely on C&Ping the opinions of others. It is you who consistently refuses to acknowledge when someone has presented primary sourced information that contradicts your assertions, and it is you who consistently runs around like a spoiled little 16 year old girl screeching "liar, liar, pants on fire" rather than address the issues. GROW UP.
