As cars get more gas millage politicians find ways to raise taxes on you for it .

[pjmret]

Election fraud can involve changing vote totals in ways that appear no fraud occurred, until the inner workings of the machine or methods are examined more closely.

Sure it can
And trump can be a space alien
All you need is proof *****

 

[pjmret]

The fact that the plaintiff lost the case does not prove the judge examined all the evidence of the case and outside the case and declared that the evidence proved no fraud anywhere took place.

Judges look at the evidence it's what they do and you prove otherwise?

 

[mark francis]

Judges look at the evidence it's what they do and you prove otherwise?

Judges look at what they are shown if they decide to do that but they do not have to rule on the limited evidence submitted for trial. Judges can and have dismissed voting fraud cases for different reasons, including things like jurisdictional restrictions or procedural policies and the like without referencing the fraud evidence at all. But no judge has been presented any but a very small percentage of widespread fraud evidence and no judge has ruled that the evidence he investigated proves beyond doubt that no voter fraud occurred in 2020.

 

[Boris Norris]

Judges look at what they are shown if they decide to do that but they do not have to rule on the limited evidence submitted for trial. Judges can and have dismissed voting fraud cases for different reasons, including things like jurisdictional restrictions or procedural policies and the like without referencing the fraud evidence at all. But no judge has been presented any but a very small percentage of widespread fraud evidence and no judge has ruled that the evidence he investigated proves beyond doubt that no voter fraud occurred in 2020.

You seem to be the only one who has all this evidence but can't support it. You act as if it is everywhere to see but GOP auditors couldn't find it.

 

[mark francis]

You seem to be the only one who has all this evidence but can't support it. You act as if it is everywhere to see but GOP auditors couldn't find it.

Evidence that has been destroyed will no longer be found.

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)

Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”
++++++++++++++++++++++++

Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties - TheBlaze
Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties

Republican electors are seeking a forensic inspection of the machines
PHIL SHIVER
November 30, 2020

A federal judge on Sunday barred state officials in Georgia from wiping Dominion voting machines in three Atlanta-area counties after Republicans electors filed an emergency motion seeking their inspection.

 

[pjmret]

Evidence that has been destroyed will no longer be found.

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)

Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”
++++++++++++++++++++++++

Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties - TheBlaze
Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties

Republican electors are seeking a forensic inspection of the machines
PHIL SHIVER
November 30, 2020

A federal judge on Sunday barred state officials in Georgia from wiping Dominion voting machines in three Atlanta-area counties after Republicans electors filed an emergency motion seeking their inspection.

no evidence anything has been destroyed, *****.

those kinds of orders are standard. plaintiff asks for everything to be retained, and a judge orders is to be retained. that doesn't mean anything illegal happened, *****.

god you're stupid. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

Evidence that has been destroyed will no longer be found.

If you had none how can you know it was destroyed?

Evidence of Vote Manipulation Redacted from Dominion Audit (visiontimes.com)

Ramsland told Newsmax’s Greg Kelly Reports that the evidence that the RCV algorithm was in play was ordered redacted by the presiding judge. “The original report had log evidence that we published in the report to show exactly what we did and exactly the findings. Now, those did ultimately get redacted. And so now, the complaint is ‘well, but there’s no real proof’ and Dominion says ‘no, these things can’t be done.’”
++++++++++++++++++++++++

Read it again fool.

Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties - TheBlaze
Judge orders Georgia officials not to 'erase' data from Dominion voting machines in 3 counties

Republican electors are seeking a forensic inspection of the machines
PHIL SHIVER
November 30, 2020

A federal judge on Sunday barred state officials in Georgia from wiping Dominion voting machines in three Atlanta-area counties after Republicans electors filed an emergency motion seeking their inspection.

What did they find after the inspection? Nothing.
You're flogging a dead horse.

 

[mark francis]

no evidence anything has been destroyed, *****.

those kinds of orders are standard. plaintiff asks for everything to be retained, and a judge orders is to be retained. that doesn't mean anything illegal happened, *****.

god you're stupid. lol

You cannot prove that. If there had been no fraud in the first place, then there would not have been any reason for the judge to tell Democrats to stop erasing data from the voting machines before the machines could be inspected.

 

[pjmret]

You cannot prove that. If there had been no fraud in the first place, then there would not have been any reason for the judge to tell Democrats to stop erasing data from the voting machines before the machines could be inspected.

he did't say to STOP ERASING, *****. nothing in his order implies they had already started erasing data *****.

god your'e stupid. lol

 

[mark francis]

he did't say to STOP ERASING, *****. nothing in his order implies they had already started erasing data *****.

god your'e stupid. lol

So he knew he had to stop them before they started erasing data, if they had not already started erasing data.

 

[pjmret]

So he knew he had to stop them before they started erasing data, if they had not already started erasing data.

He doesn't say that anywhere ***** that's just a lie you just made up unless you can prove it which you can't

This is a very standard practice by Judges when there are questions about records Judges issue in order to make sure no one gets rid of the records that does not imply that they are being erased or they will be erased it's just a standard practice



You are just not only a science ***** but also a legal ***** and a lying fake Christian LOL

 

[mark francis]

He doesn't say that anywhere ***** that's just a lie you just made up unless you can prove it which you can't

This is a very standard practice by Judges when there are questions about records Judges issue in order to make sure no one gets rid of the records that does not imply that they are being erased or they will be erased it's just a standard practice



You are just not only a science ***** but also a legal ***** and a lying fake Christian LOL

Let's assume nobody would erase data from voting machines at any time until all audits had been completed. If that is true then why did the judge tell the elections officials not to erase data? If the thought would have never occurred to the officials to erase data, then do you not think they would be offended by some pompous judge assuming they had to be told not to erase data?