Does Science Argue for or against God?

Werbung:
The Irrational Physics at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century Foretold Its Irrational Politics

Entanglement is one particle entering and leaving the outside universe (4th Spatial Dimension) at its maximum velocity, c-squared, which in our universe is the equivalent of a light-year every 3 minutes. Then it returns at the same speed. Imagine if you could go that fast from the equator to the north pole. You'd be shivering in the desert. But Postmodern scientists would say that you had a brother there and felt what he felt, as in the Cheech and Chong movie The Corsican Brothers.
I doubt cheech or chong have felt much for years just like ozzy and keith richards
 
Well, the discerning person wouldn't mind the word God used in a secular context. A secular context suffused with wonder at the nature of reality. If we are to fight harmful fundamentalism, we can't cede the usage of the word God to people touting the scriptures. I'm afraid that would amount to a kind of fundamentalism about science. The word God, like the word infinity, is so broad that it transcends partisanship.
Representation Is a Re-Presentation of All Previous Elitist Tyranny

Pushy political predators who preach that we are under the Supreme Law of the Constitution are of the same ilk as Bible-bangers. They also treat the Wags Wearing Wigs who drafted that anti-democratic manifesto as if such typical politicians were the Evangelists.
 
Representation Is a Re-Presentation of All Previous Elitist Tyranny

Pushy political predators who preach that we are under the Supreme Law of the Constitution are of the same ilk as Bible-bangers. They also treat the Wags Wearing Wigs who drafted that anti-democratic manifesto as if such typical politicians were the Evangelists.

if not under the constitution, what are we "under""? politicians and their whims?
 
if not under the constitution, what are we "under""? politicians and their whims?
We all follow the money.

That is why wealth is a private matter, and the governments would have it no other way.

People do not recognize that we could end poverty today if we chose to move less than 1% of our collective wealth.

If the general population is too stupid to recognize this fact, what can any of us do?

Regards
DL
 
We all follow the money.

That is why wealth is a private matter, and the governments would have it no other way.

People do not recognize that we could end poverty today if we chose to move less than 1% of our collective wealth.

If the general population is too stupid to recognize this fact, what can any of us do?

Regards
DL
As if it all started when Biden was elected. Go back to sleep you moron.
 
if not under the constitution, what are we "under""? politicians and their whims?
We Are the Underclass Under Birth-Class Supremacy

The ruling class's Constitution empowers its flunkies to do everything Constitutionazis claim it prevents. Establishing a republic takes away the people's right to self-determination and hands it over to an oligarchic clique.
 
We Are the Underclass Under Birth-Class Supremacy

The ruling class's Constitution empowers its flunkies to do everything Constitutionazis claim it prevents. Establishing a republic takes away the people's right to self-determination and hands it over to an oligarchic clique.

word salad. lol.

parody account.
 
Werbung:
I doubt cheech or chong have felt much for years just like ozzy and keith richards
Motto of Quantum Quacks: "If It's Weird, It's Wise"

Astrogeeks should have realized that the Quantum Leap, just like any other leap, indicates an outside dimension or universe. Instead, these childish escapist nerds came up with irrational explanations similar to the Christofascists' "The wisdom of the Lord is beyond human understanding."
 
Back
Top