Hakeem Jeffries denied legitimacy of Trump's 2016 election

[Yo Daddy!]

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the New York Democrat poised to succeed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as his party's leader in the House, has repeatedly denied the legitimacy of Donald Trump's 2016 election.


But his claims of a stolen election and voter suppression have hardly gotten the same treatment as Trump and other Republicans who have raised ballot integrity issues and been endlessly branded as "election deniers."

Jeffries, currently the House Democratic Conference chairman, has tweeted that Trump cheated in the 2016 election and stole two Supreme Court seats.

Democrat poised to succeed Pelosi repeatedly denied legitimacy of Trump's 2016 election

Hakeem Jeffries' claims range from stolen election to voter suppression. Will news media treat him same as Republicans?

justthenews.com

 

[Starcastle]

I want a moron like this to be the dems house leader. If Hank Johnson or Maxine Waters don't want the job.

Should he be charged with treason!

 

[pjmret]

View attachment 1915

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the New York Democrat poised to succeed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as his party's leader in the House, has repeatedly denied the legitimacy of Donald Trump's 2016 election.


But his claims of a stolen election and voter suppression have hardly gotten the same treatment as Trump and other Republicans who have raised ballot integrity issues and been endlessly branded as "election deniers."

Jeffries, currently the House Democratic Conference chairman, has tweeted that Trump cheated in the 2016 election and stole two Supreme Court seats.

Democrat poised to succeed Pelosi repeatedly denied legitimacy of Trump's 2016 election

Hakeem Jeffries' claims range from stolen election to voter suppression. Will news media treat him same as Republicans?

justthenews.com

russians clearly interfered illegally with our election on behalf of trump.
which is why they were indicted by meuller's analysis.

Grand Jury Indicts 12 Russian Intelligence Officers for Hacking Offenses Related to the 2016 Election​

The Department of Justice today announced that a grand jury in the District of Columbia returned an indictment presented by the Special Counsel’s Office. The indictment charges twelve Russian nationals for committing federal crimes that were intended to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election. All twelve defendants are members of the GRU, a Russian Federation intelligence agency within the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Russian military. These GRU officers, in their official capacities, engaged in a sustained effort to hack into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic National Committee, and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, and released that information on the internet under the names "DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0" and through another entity.

also the gop led senate concluded the same thing:

The Trump campaign’s interactions with Russian intelligence services during the 2016 presidential election posed a “grave” counterintelligence threat, a Senate panel concluded Tuesday as it detailed how associates of Donald Trump had regular contact with Russians and expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s help.

The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump’s behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin’s aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers.




unlike the republican stupidity about "stolen elections" with zero democratic indictments.

 

[Starcastle]

How does hacking offense prove that Trump did not win in 2016?

You can indict a ham sandwich.

District of Columbia?

 

[Yo Daddy!]

How does hacking offense prove that Trump did not win in 2016?

You can indict a ham sandwich.

District of Columbia?

I counter your non-sequiturs with some of my own.

Why is there air?

You can drive a car.

Berlin, Germany.

 

[Starcastle]

I counter your non-sequiturs with some of my own.

Why is there air?

You can drive a car.

Berlin, Germany.

WTF are you talking about?

 

[Starcastle]

Were we not told that disputing the election results was an assault on democracy? That attacking the legitimacy of an election was treason?

My choice for democrat leader of the house is Hank Johnson. Erudite intellectual!

 

[Boris Norris]

You people are becoming more paranoid and unhinged every day.

 

[Yo Daddy!]

WTF are you talking about?

Back atcha.

 

[Starcastle]

Back atcha.

I get it. You have no clue.

 

[pjmret]

How does hacking offense prove that Trump did not win in 2016?

You can indict a ham sandwich.

District of Columbia?

it doesn't PROVE it, of course.
but the hack and release of info about clinton definitely hurt her, and the race was close.

you think the indictments were false? lol

 

[pjmret]

Were we not told that disputing the election results was an assault on democracy? That attacking the legitimacy of an election was treason?

My choice for democrat leader of the house is Hank Johnson. Erudite intellectual!

disputing WITH NO EVIDENCE is an assault on democracy. duh.

russians..plenty of evidence. duh again

 

[Starcastle]

it doesn't PROVE it, of course.
but the hack and release of info about clinton definitely hurt her, and the race was close.

you think the indictments were false? lol

A grand jury in DC would indict with zero evidence if they could use it against Trump.