Here we go again.

[Boris Norris]

Courts have proven by a wide majority an unwillingness to try voting fraud cases in open court before American voters. Leftist judges are wise to refuse to take up the cases, knowing evidence of widespread voting fraud cannot be disproven in court.

Bullshit. More sour grapes and lies.

 

[Boris Norris]

Courts throwing out voting fraud cases without disproving fraud is not a mark in Democrat's favor.

Nothing to do with democrats. They never instigated the proceedings. Trump did.
It's not the courts job to disprove anything. That's reverse justice.

 

[pjmret]

Courts that threw out voting fraud cases without disproving the evidence have lost the respect of honest Americans.

No. Honest intelligent Americans understand how courts work
Unlike legal morons like you

 

[Boris Norris]

No. Honest intelligent Americans understand how courts work
Unlike legal morons like you

Thus poor bastard is not wired right. He's been belting away at this for years now and still can't get the facts.
There's something seriously wrong. Even the GOP are now satisfied it wasn't fraud. They co ducted their own investigation and found nothing.
Then up pops this knuckle dragger with a fake report a postal worker witnessed all these fake ballots. He's a nutter.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Democrats oppose voter IDs, citizenship verifications, and voter roll purges of names of ineligible voters. There is no reason to oppose these except to protect the practice of voting fraud.

Democrats never proved once. As to the 2020 vote the GOP was corrupt, and still do so.

 

[mark francis]

Isn't Biden doing a great job. Best POTUS ever.

The naked emperor and his sycophant supporters?

 

[pjmret]

The naked emperor and his sycophant supporters?

View attachment 8657

economic meltdown? lol. 5% gdp growth last quarter? i hope it melts down even more!

you post the dumbest things

 

[mark francis]

Bullshit. More sour grapes and lies.

Do you really believe courts want to try voting fraud cases? If so, why have Democrats not taken fraud cases to court to prove their innocence?

 

[pjmret]

Do you really believe courts want to try voting fraud cases? If so, why have Democrats not taken fraud cases to court to prove their innocence?

they were happy to try them, which is how you lost all of them. lol.

you don't go to court to prove your innocence, not how the legal system works.
you are a legal moron. lol

 

[mark francis]

Nothing to do with democrats. They never instigated the proceedings. Trump did.
It's not the courts job to disprove anything. That's reverse justice.

Many different people took voting fraud evidence to court with various results and reasons for dismissal also varying. But Democrats did not support taking voting fraud cases to court in order to get their side of the story airtime in public, suggesting they had no confidence that airing evidence of voting fraud in public would convince most Americans that the claims of voting fraud were unfounded.

 

[mark francis]

economic meltdown? lol. 5% gdp growth last quarter? i hope it melts down even more!

you post the dumbest things

I am guessing you have no idea how many US states are currently on the verge of bankruptcy and why.

 

[mark francis]

they were happy to try them, which is how you lost all of them. lol.

you don't go to court to prove your innocence, not how the legal system works.
you are a legal moron. lol

Lost court cases that fined drunks for driving? That was not me. Lost cases that disproved voter fraud? Never heard of such a case.

 

[pjmret]

I am guessing you have no idea how many US states are currently on the verge of bankruptcy and why.

i am guessing you are an economic moron if you think less than 4% unemployment and 5% gdp growth is an "economic meltdown".
and I"d be right!

 

[pjmret]

Lost court cases that fined drunks for driving? That was not me. Lost cases that disproved voter fraud? Never heard of such a case.

and i've never heard of a republican winning a court case claiming election fraud in the 2020 election.
because your side lost them all.

talk about you being on the side of pathetic losers. lol

 

[Wry Catcher]

Many different people took voting fraud evidence to court with various results and reasons for dismissal also varying. But Democrats did not support taking voting fraud cases to court in order to get their side of the story airtime in public, suggesting they had no confidence that airing evidence of voting fraud in public would convince most Americans that the claims of voting fraud were unfounded.

It seems you are out of reality.