In honor of Ronald Reagan

nobull

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
402
This weekend, as America celebrated Independence Day, a statue of President Ronald Reagan was unveiled in London. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and others were on hand for the dedication. The bronze statue sits in the same park as a statue dedicated to the memory of Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower, which was dedicated in 1989 by the Iron Lady herself, Margaret Thatcher. The Reagan statue is part of the world-wide celebrations celebrating the centennial of Reagan’s birth.

That night, a dinner was held in honor of Reagan. It capped a day of events that celebrated the life and extraordinary achievements of the 40th President of the United States. Yet, missing from the dinner – clearly the biggest event of the day – was United States Ambassador Louis Susman. While he did host a VIP breakfast that morning, Susman was absent from the grandest event, where speeches were given and the memory of Reagan was put forth – reminding everyone of his impact, and his legacy.

Once again, Obama and his cronies can’t think their way out of a ripped-open paper bag. First, the appointment of Susman as Ambassador to England shows the level of disregard Obama has for these positions and engagements. While promising during the election to fill ambassadorships with top level people, Susman got the job (in very large part) to the fact that he was a long-time Democratic fundraiser, spending a decade on the DNC and working on both the Kerry campaign in 2004 and Obama’s run in 2008. . . .

Second, what could the Ambassador to England have on his schedule that is more important than attending a celebration and commemoration of a US president? Isn’t this, in part, part of the job? When a foreign country goes out of its way to honor your country, doesn’t that give you a unique leverage that should be capitalized on? Doesn’t it follow that the only way to capitalize on it is to actually be there?

From all reports, Susman was not sick, stricken with illness or involved in a really intense game of Farmville. He simply didn’t show up, as the representative of the United States, to an event honoring one of the greatest presidents in US history.
 
Werbung:
This weekend, as America celebrated Independence Day, a statue of President Ronald Reagan was unveiled in London. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and others were on hand for the dedication. The bronze statue sits in the same park as a statue dedicated to the memory of Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower, which was dedicated in 1989 by the Iron Lady herself, Margaret Thatcher. The Reagan statue is part of the world-wide celebrations celebrating the centennial of Reagan’s birth.

That night, a dinner was held in honor of Reagan. It capped a day of events that celebrated the life and extraordinary achievements of the 40th President of the United States. Yet, missing from the dinner – clearly the biggest event of the day – was United States Ambassador Louis Susman. While he did host a VIP breakfast that morning, Susman was absent from the grandest event, where speeches were given and the memory of Reagan was put forth – reminding everyone of his impact, and his legacy.

Once again, Obama and his cronies can’t think their way out of a ripped-open paper bag. First, the appointment of Susman as Ambassador to England shows the level of disregard Obama has for these positions and engagements. While promising during the election to fill ambassadorships with top level people, Susman got the job (in very large part) to the fact that he was a long-time Democratic fundraiser, spending a decade on the DNC and working on both the Kerry campaign in 2004 and Obama’s run in 2008. . . .

Second, what could the Ambassador to England have on his schedule that is more important than attending a celebration and commemoration of a US president? Isn’t this, in part, part of the job? When a foreign country goes out of its way to honor your country, doesn’t that give you a unique leverage that should be capitalized on? Doesn’t it follow that the only way to capitalize on it is to actually be there?

From all reports, Susman was not sick, stricken with illness or involved in a really intense game of Farmville. He simply didn’t show up, as the representative of the United States, to an event honoring one of the greatest presidents in US history.

what does the ambassador have to do more important that standing for pictures at a statue? ummm I would hope quite a bit...

Not evryone gets a wet dream at the thought of Regan...
 
what does the ambassador have to do more important that standing for pictures at a statue? ummm I would hope quite a bit...

Not evryone gets a wet dream at the thought of Regan...

you know they say Sampson killed 3000 Philistines with the Jawbone of and azz. And here you demonstrate the use of precisely the same weapon.

regards
doug
 
what does the ambassador have to do more important that standing for pictures at a statue? ummm I would hope quite a bit...

Not evryone gets a wet dream at the thought of Regan...


I am certain that there were lots of more important things to do, than to attend an inauguration for a statue that was privately funded by the Reagan foundation.

You make it appear as if either England or America offered that statue, and that the whole world was enthralled by this event.

Sorry, it is merely a marketing plot. I don't see anything wrong with putting statue of Reagan in the Mayfair neighborhood in London, but it has NOTHING to do with the embassy. In fact, when the U.S. embassy moved to it's new quarters later this year, the statue will remain right there.

I would certainly hope that the U.S. ambassador has more to do than to attend a publicity stunt for a dead President!

By the way, even is wife (Nancy Reagan) wasn't there, this is why Condoleeza was there!
 
I am certain that there were lots of more important things to do, than to attend an inauguration for a statue that was privately funded by the Reagan foundation.

You make it appear as if either England or America offered that statue, and that the whole world was enthralled by this event.

Sorry, it is merely a marketing plot. I don't see anything wrong with putting statue of Reagan in the Mayfair neighborhood in London, but it has NOTHING to do with the embassy. In fact, when the U.S. embassy moved to it's new quarters later this year, the statue will remain right there.

I would certainly hope that the U.S. ambassador has more to do than to attend a publicity stunt for a dead President!

By the way, even is wife (Nancy Reagan) wasn't there, this is why Condoleeza was there!

The ambassador had no reason to attend this event, and it says he hosted a breakfast that morning.

All of that said, the Ambassador to England never has anything important to do..it is probably the best assignment you can get.
 
The ambassador had no reason to attend this event, and it says he hosted a breakfast that morning.

All of that said, the Ambassador to England never has anything important to do..it is probably the best assignment you can get.

I can believe that. I lived in England (Surrey) for about 4 years, and English love protocole. I actually really enjoyed living there!
 
Werbung:
This weekend, as America celebrated Independence Day, a statue of President Ronald Reagan was unveiled in London. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and others were on hand for the dedication. The bronze statue sits in the same park as a statue dedicated to the memory of Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower, which was dedicated in 1989 by the Iron Lady herself, Margaret Thatcher. The Reagan statue is part of the world-wide celebrations celebrating the centennial of Reagan’s birth.

That night, a dinner was held in honor of Reagan. It capped a day of events that celebrated the life and extraordinary achievements of the 40th President of the United States. Yet, missing from the dinner – clearly the biggest event of the day – was United States Ambassador Louis Susman. While he did host a VIP breakfast that morning, Susman was absent from the grandest event, where speeches were given and the memory of Reagan was put forth – reminding everyone of his impact, and his legacy.

Once again, Obama and his cronies can’t think their way out of a ripped-open paper bag. First, the appointment of Susman as Ambassador to England shows the level of disregard Obama has for these positions and engagements. While promising during the election to fill ambassadorships with top level people, Susman got the job (in very large part) to the fact that he was a long-time Democratic fundraiser, spending a decade on the DNC and working on both the Kerry campaign in 2004 and Obama’s run in 2008. . . .

Second, what could the Ambassador to England have on his schedule that is more important than attending a celebration and commemoration of a US president? Isn’t this, in part, part of the job? When a foreign country goes out of its way to honor your country, doesn’t that give you a unique leverage that should be capitalized on? Doesn’t it follow that the only way to capitalize on it is to actually be there?

From all reports, Susman was not sick, stricken with illness or involved in a really intense game of Farmville. He simply didn’t show up, as the representative of the United States, to an event honoring one of the greatest presidents in US history.

Why would any government official choose to attend a political rally? Why would any Democratic president feel an obligation to recognize a Republican political rally?

What is the big deal? Obama didn't attend CPAC, either.
 
Back
Top