i love how everyone avoided this thread...
Well, I just saw it
And to be fair, no one STILL has said what they would compromise on.
I'll tell you a couple of things I feel I am compromising on by supporting Ron Paul's campaign.
*I am less than happy about the implications of his Libertarian background, with regard to SOME social support programs.
*I am at this point quite opposed to his position against protective tariffs ...but as I told another poster, that might change after I read more of an economics book I recently bought.
Even so, I feel that Ron Paul is the only supportable candidate because he alone among them seems to grasp the significance of the Constitution and also the damage done since 1913 by the Federal Reserve.
You don't like them either ?
If so, what are you willing to compromise on?
If not, why not?
One should serve neither where such servitude would conflict with an individual's right to have the freedom to engage in any peaceful, honest or voluntary activity. The only legitimate function of government is to secure the inalienable, individual rights of its Citizens under Natural Law.