Is Serving The National Interest More Important Than Serving A Political Party?

Werbung:
TVoffBrainOn said:
i love how everyone avoided this thread...
Click to expand...

Well, I just saw it
:p

And to be fair, no one STILL has said what they would compromise on.

I'll tell you a couple of things I feel I am compromising on by supporting Ron Paul's campaign.

*I am less than happy about the implications of his Libertarian background, with regard to SOME social support programs.

*I am at this point quite opposed to his position against protective tariffs ...but as I told another poster, that might change after I read more of an economics book I recently bought.

Even so, I feel that Ron Paul is the only supportable candidate because he alone among them seems to grasp the significance of the Constitution and also the damage done since 1913 by the Federal Reserve.
 
Lilly Marlene said:
Well, I just saw it
:p

And to be fair, no one STILL has said what they would compromise on.

I'll tell you a couple of things I feel I am compromising on by supporting Ron Paul's campaign.

*I am less than happy about the implications of his Libertarian background, with regard to SOME social support programs.

*I am at this point quite opposed to his position against protective tariffs ...but as I told another poster, that might change after I read more of an economics book I recently bought.

Even so, I feel that Ron Paul is the only supportable candidate because he alone among them seems to grasp the significance of the Constitution and also the damage done since 1913 by the Federal Reserve.
Click to expand...

cheers to that lily!
 
TVoffBrainOn said:
cheers to that lily!
Click to expand...


You don't like them either ?
:)


tbankersdees.jpg
 
Lilly Marlene said:
You don't like them either ?
:)


tbankersdees.jpg
Click to expand...

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."

- Jefferson
 
I wonder if the people on this board know how much of their income tax is used every year only to pay the interest owed to the Federal Reserve.
 
InterestedParty said:
If so, what are you willing to compromise on?

If not, why not?
Click to expand...

One should serve neither where such servitude would conflict with an individual's right to have the freedom to engage in any peaceful, honest or voluntary activity. The only legitimate function of government is to secure the inalienable, individual rights of its Citizens under Natural Law.
 
Truth-Bringer said:
One should serve neither where such servitude would conflict with an individual's right to have the freedom to engage in any peaceful, honest or voluntary activity. The only legitimate function of government is to secure the inalienable, individual rights of its Citizens under Natural Law.
Click to expand...

I think there is a conflict between securing inalienable rights and freedom.
 
Werbung:

Similar threads

dogtowner
Roseanne Barr for president ? Yeah for real...
Replies
1
Views
1K
Arbopa
Arbopa
A
Having the "jury foreman" also serve as "executioner", is that fair?
2 3
Replies
31
Views
5K
always
A
J
Elections and political parties are the vehicle of dictators!
Replies
0
Views
1K
junglelaw
J
A
Please Mr. President Obama!! Take "Time Served"
Replies
14
Views
2K
ktucan1
ktucan1
Little-Acorn
What exactly is the purpose of compromising in our Debt Crisis?
Replies
1
Views
920
Little-Acorn
Little-Acorn
Back
Top