KARMA TIME For Charlie Kirk

Weapons that shoot the same amount of the same ammo in the same way as those that are used by the military can be bought at gun shows all over this country. AR 15 is one type.

You are a clueless ignoramus.
 
Werbung:
Weapons that shoot the same amount of the same ammo in the same way as those that are used by the military can be bought at gun shows all over this country. AR 15 is one type.

You are a clueless ignoramus.
a m4 which is what the military uses has a 14.5 in barrel and is selective fire a afr 15 is neither dumb ass


The M4 is a military carbine with selective fire capabilities, while the AR-15 is a civilian semi-automatic rifle, primarily differing in fire mode, barrel length, and intended use.
Key Differences
Fire Mode:
M4: Capable of fully automatic or three-round burst fire modes, making it suitable for military applications.
AR-15: Designed as a semi-automatic rifle, meaning it fires one round per trigger pull. This is the primary legal distinction between the two firearms.
2


2 Sources
Barrel Length:
M4: Typically features a shorter barrel length of 14.5 inches, which enhances maneuverability in close-quarters combat. It is designed to accommodate attachments like grenade launchers.
2
AR-15: Generally has a longer barrel of at least 16 inches, which is required for civilian models under U.S. law. However, AR-15s can be customized with various barrel lengths.
2


3 Sources
Design and Components:
M4: Built to military specifications, the M4 includes features like a collapsible stock and a shorter gas system. It is designed for durability and adaptability in combat situations.
2
AR-15: A more modular platform that allows for extensive customization. While it shares many components with the M4, the AR-15 can be configured for various purposes, from hunting to sport shooting.
2


3 Sources
Intended Use:
M4: Standard issue for the U.S. military, designed for combat and tactical operations. It is optimized for performance in military environments.
2
AR-15: Primarily intended for civilian use, including recreational shooting, hunting, and home defense. It is not designed for military combat.
2


4 Sources
Legal Considerations:
M4: Restricted to military personnel and not available for civilian purchase in its full-auto configuration. Civilians can only own semi-automatic versions or clones that mimic the M4's appearance without the select-fire capability.
2
AR-15: Widely available for civilian ownership, with various manufacturers producing models that comply with legal standards for semi-automatic firearms.
2


4 Sources
Conclusion
While the M4 and AR-15 share a common lineage and many design features, their differences in fire mode, barrel length, and intended use highlight their distinct roles in military and civilian contexts. The M4 is tailored for combat, while the AR-15 serves a broader range of civilian applications.

learn something egg I doubt it your wrong again dumb ass

All you do is run your mouth about things your are cluses about dumb ass
 
That sounds like a stupid leftist conspiracy theory that a Jew-hater might try to promote.
I do not hate Jews, but I DO hate Zionists, and you are too stupid to know the difference.
Jews did not murder over 65000 Palestinians or steal land in the West Bank, but Zionists did.

You are a dimwit supporter of Shitshizpants and Shady Vance and Netanyahu.
 
I do not hate Jews, but I DO hate Zionists, and you are too stupid to know the difference.
Jews did not murder over 65000 Palestinians or steal land in the West Bank, but Zionists did.

You are a dimwit supporter of Shitshizpants and Shady Vance and Netanyahu.
dumb ass you forget that they started attacking the jeews in 1947 nation after nation terririst group s and lost now they cry your woke and a stupid bsstard
 
.
Spanking Chuckles!!!!
September 13, 2025
.
"Chuckles" Kirk was a far-right extremist American bigot who spent his career promoting far-right extremist bigotry of many kinds. He focused most especially upon college campuses, where he worked very successfully and lucratively to radicalize young people and to expand the margins of permission as regards bigoted speech and action generally. He would set up camp at a folding table with a microphone next to a sign that said PROVE ME WRONG. And a lot of people would prove him wrong, too, and then Chuckles Kirk would prove how extremist right-wing bigots like Chuckles Kirk utilize the trappings of debate—not as a way of coming to mutual understanding, but as a tool to normalize extremist ideology, which he would accomplish via the trick of making a big show of refusing to be persuaded by truth no matter how wrong he had just been proven."
.
 
.
Spanking Chuckles!!!!
September 13, 2025
.
"Chuckles" Kirk was a far-right extremist American bigot who spent his career promoting far-right extremist bigotry of many kinds. He focused most especially upon college campuses, where he worked very successfully and lucratively to radicalize young people and to expand the margins of permission as regards bigoted speech and action generally. He would set up camp at a folding table with a microphone next to a sign that said PROVE ME WRONG. And a lot of people would prove him wrong, too, and then Chuckles Kirk would prove how extremist right-wing bigots like Chuckles Kirk utilize the trappings of debate—not as a way of coming to mutual understanding, but as a tool to normalize extremist ideology, which he would accomplish via the trick of making a big show of refusing to be persuaded by truth no matter how wrong he had just been proven."
.
Your scum
 
.
Spanking Chuckles!!!!
September 13, 2025
.
"Chuckles" Kirk was a far-right extremist American bigot who spent his career promoting far-right extremist bigotry of many kinds. He focused most especially upon college campuses, where he worked very successfully and lucratively to radicalize young people and to expand the margins of permission as regards bigoted speech and action generally. He would set up camp at a folding table with a microphone next to a sign that said PROVE ME WRONG. And a lot of people would prove him wrong, too, and then Chuckles Kirk would prove how extremist right-wing bigots like Chuckles Kirk utilize the trappings of debate—not as a way of coming to mutual understanding, but as a tool to normalize extremist ideology, which he would accomplish via the trick of making a big show of refusing to be persuaded by truth no matter how wrong he had just been proven."
.
Democrats are not ashamed their deluded followers murder democrat opponents, inspired by hateful violent democrat narratives.
 
"Rev. Wesley, living in the D.C. area, saw the lowered flags, and that sight inspired part of his Sunday message to his congregation, pointing out the seeming double standard in the honor and veneration Kirk has inspired among the right.
.
I do not celebrate the killing of anyone. Charlie Kirk did not deserve to be assassinated, he started. “But I’m overwhelmed seeing the flags of the United States of America at half-staff, calling this nation to honor and venerate a man who was
an unapologetic racist and spent all of his life sowing seeds of division and hate into this land. And hearing people with selective rage, who are mad about Charlie Kirk, but didn’t give a damn about Melissa Hortman and her husband when they were shot down in their home.”
.
 
Werbung:
"Rev. Wesley, living in the D.C. area, saw the lowered flags, and that sight inspired part of his Sunday message to his congregation, pointing out the seeming double standard in the honor and veneration Kirk has inspired among the right.
.
I do not celebrate the killing of anyone. Charlie Kirk did not deserve to be assassinated, he started. “But I’m overwhelmed seeing the flags of the United States of America at half-staff, calling this nation to honor and venerate a man who was
an unapologetic racist and spent all of his life sowing seeds of division and hate into this land. And hearing people with selective rage, who are mad about Charlie Kirk, but didn’t give a damn about Melissa Hortman and her husband when they were shot down in their home.”
.
We will apparently always be forced to listen to deranged leftist black 'ministers' claiming others are wicked or evil for not agreeing with racist black leftists on one thing or another.
 
Back
Top