Liberals at it again inn Chicago what will it add up to by tomorrow end

[mark francis]

They were a GOP sponsored group idiot.
How could you know if it was thorough or not?

Political party affiliation does not exempt investigators from criticism if they do a sloppy job.

 

[mark francis]

You've got some paranoia issues over something that never happened.
You're the only fool left who believes it was stolen but being a republican would lend itself to that.

Nobody can prove all the evidence of voter fraud is false.

 

[pjmret]

Political party affiliation does not exempt investigators from criticism if they do a sloppy job.

who did a sloppy job *****?
list them.

 

[pjmret]

Nobody can prove all the evidence of voter fraud is false.

post some evidence which you claim has not been disproven, *****. lol

You are right. No voter fraud case was ever examined in open court, proving no court could have possibly uncovered evidence to support the claim that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

yes, but these cases aren't examined in open courts, because judges are deemed better to evaluate them than juries are,.
and even "open courts" wouldn't "uncover evidence" *****. duh. people making the claim of fraud provide the evidence.

god you are so stupid i'm not sure i understand how you can even continue to eat food and live. lol.

 

[Boris Norris]

Nobody can prove all the evidence of voter fraud is false.

It's already done. Joe is the POTUS and Trump is a failure. Stick to your Bible son.

 

[Boris Norris]

Political party affiliation does not exempt investigators from criticism if they do a sloppy job.

You're not worth debating. You're out of your tree with hate and lies.

 

[Boris Norris]

You are right. No voter fraud case was ever examined in open court, proving no court could have possibly uncovered evidence to support the claim that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

The point here is no court took it further than a reading. It was all BS so why waste their time. Not even the GOP stacked supreme court would touch it. Does that tell you something?

 

[mark francis]

who did a sloppy job *****?
list them.

Anyone claiming to have seriously investigated voter fraud claims and found no evidence of possible voter fraud is untrustworthy.

 

[pjmret]

Anyone claiming to have seriously investigated voter fraud claims and found no evidence of possible voter fraud is untrustworthy.

prove that, lying fake christian *****.

in michigan for example, the republicans investigated their state election and found nothing.
are you saying both parties are unreliable? lol.

you're just a lying ***** who denies any reality that conflicts with your own beliefs, no matter how stupid.

 

[mark francis]

post some evidence which you claim has not been disproven, *****. lol

You cannot prove a negative, to paraphrase a favorite Democrat saying.

yes, but these cases aren't examined in open courts, because judges are deemed better to evaluate them than juries are,.
and even "open courts" wouldn't "uncover evidence" *****. duh. people making the claim of fraud provide the evidence.

A biased judge can dismiss voter fraud claims for whatever reason he wants, thus preventing cases from being heard in court where the evidence would be examined more publicly. The best defense crooks have to cover up their fraud is to keep cases out of court where the facts can be better hidden from the public to prevent the findings of fraud from possibly becoming grounds for seriously challenging the validity of the 2020 election.

god you are so stupid i'm not sure i understand how you can even continue to eat food and live. lol.

 

[Boris Norris]

Anyone claiming to have seriously investigated voter fraud claims and found no evidence of possible voter fraud is untrustworthy.

You'd be advised to alert the GOP to your finding because they paid for it.
Are they untrustworthy?
You should have been selected to do the audit but you couldn't be trusted I suppose.

 

[mark francis]

It's already done. Joe is the POTUS and Trump is a failure. Stick to your Bible son.

Biden is the illegitimately elected president.

 

[pjmret]

Biden is the illegitimately elected president.

all you morons need is credible proof. lol.

its a shame the dhs, doj, 50 states and every judge disagreed with you.

 

[mark francis]

The point here is no court took it further than a reading. It was all BS so why waste their time. Not even the GOP stacked supreme court would touch it. Does that tell you something?

When cultists are convinced a lie is the truth, they do not need facts and evidence to verify what they already believe, nor will they accept facts and evidence that contradict what they already believe.

 

[pjmret]

When cultists are convinced a lie is the truth, they do not need facts and evidence to verify what they already believe, nor will they accept facts and evidence that contradict what they already believe.

you're the definition of a cultist.
dhs, doj, 50 states, every judge said there wasn't massive fraud.

but you won't believe them. lol