Mike Johnson; Trippin' Over His Dick, ALREADY!!!!!

[Wry Catcher]

I did not enter or lose a single court case and no court in the US ever ruled that the evidence of 2020 voter fraud was a lie.

Yeah. I was in court for 32 years and never once was bothered by the trier of facts.

 

[mark francis]

There were no scheduled hearings that day
God hates when you lie

Here is part of the transcript of the hearings that took place on Jan 6 as planned, before being interrupted by the mob incitement.



CREC-2021-01-06.pdf (congress.gov)

Mr. JORDAN. Madam Speaker, Americans instinctively know there was something wrong with this election. During the campaign, Vice President Biden would do an event and get 50 people at the event. President Trump, at just one rally, gets 50,000 people. President Trump increases votes with African Americans; increases votes with Hispanic Americans; won 19 of 20 bellwether counties; won Ohio by 8; Iowa by 8; and Florida by 3. President Trump got 11 million more votes than he did in 2016, and House Republicans won 27 of 27 toss-up races.

But somehow the guy who never left his house wins the election? Eighty million Americans, 80 million of our fellow citizens, Republicans and Democrats, have doubts about this election; and 60 million people, 60 million Americans think it was stolen. But Democrats say: No problem. No worries. Everything is fine. We asked for an investigation. We asked Chairman NADLER, Chairwoman MALONEY for an investigation. They said no. They wouldn’t want to investigate something that half the electorate has doubts about. It is just the Presidency of the United States. Why? Why not one single investigation? Why not even one single hearing over the last 9 weeks in the United States House of Representatives? Why?

Because all the Democrats care about is making sure President Trump isn’t President. For 41⁄2 years that is all they have cared about. July 31, 2016, before he was elected the first time, Jim Comey’s FBI takes out the insurance policy; opens an investigation on the President based on nothing. May 17, 2017, Bob Mueller was named special counsel. Two years they investigate the Russia hoax.

Nineteen lawyers, 40 agents and $40 million of taxpayer money for nothing. December 18, 2019, Democrat House Members vote to impeach President Trump based on an anonymous whistleblower with no firsthand knowledge, who was biased against the President and who worked for Joe Biden. But none of that worked. As hard as they tried, none of that worked.

They threw everything they had at him. So what did they do next? They changed the rules. They changed the election law and they did it in an unconstitutional fashion, and that is what we are going to show over the next several hours of debate.

 

[mark francis]

Trump and his family is corrupt. Joe Biden is a good man and trump ain't.

Millions of Americans do not agree with that opinion.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Millions of Americans do not agree with that opinion.

You lie.

 

[pjmret]

Here is part of the transcript of the hearings that took place on Jan 6 as planned, before being interrupted by the mob incitement.



CREC-2021-01-06.pdf (congress.gov)

Mr. JORDAN. Madam Speaker, Americans instinctively know there was something wrong with this election. During the campaign, Vice President Biden would do an event and get 50 people at the event. President Trump, at just one rally, gets 50,000 people. President Trump increases votes with African Americans; increases votes with Hispanic Americans; won 19 of 20 bellwether counties; won Ohio by 8; Iowa by 8; and Florida by 3. President Trump got 11 million more votes than he did in 2016, and House Republicans won 27 of 27 toss-up races.

But somehow the guy who never left his house wins the election? Eighty million Americans, 80 million of our fellow citizens, Republicans and Democrats, have doubts about this election; and 60 million people, 60 million Americans think it was stolen. But Democrats say: No problem. No worries. Everything is fine. We asked for an investigation. We asked Chairman NADLER, Chairwoman MALONEY for an investigation. They said no. They wouldn’t want to investigate something that half the electorate has doubts about. It is just the Presidency of the United States. Why? Why not one single investigation? Why not even one single hearing over the last 9 weeks in the United States House of Representatives? Why?

Because all the Democrats care about is making sure President Trump isn’t President. For 41⁄2 years that is all they have cared about. July 31, 2016, before he was elected the first time, Jim Comey’s FBI takes out the insurance policy; opens an investigation on the President based on nothing. May 17, 2017, Bob Mueller was named special counsel. Two years they investigate the Russia hoax.

Nineteen lawyers, 40 agents and $40 million of taxpayer money for nothing. December 18, 2019, Democrat House Members vote to impeach President Trump based on an anonymous whistleblower with no firsthand knowledge, who was biased against the President and who worked for Joe Biden. But none of that worked. As hard as they tried, none of that worked.

They threw everything they had at him. So what did they do next? They changed the rules. They changed the election law and they did it in an unconstitutional fashion, and that is what we are going to show over the next several hours of debate.

again, it wasn't a "scheduled hearing on fraud", you are quoting from "counting electoral votes" which is different.
you are a political *****.

 

[mark francis]

again, it wasn't a "scheduled hearing on fraud", you are quoting from "counting electoral votes" which is different.
you are a political *****.

Tens of thousands of conservatives knew what Congress was going to be doing on Jan 6 before Congress had hearings to discuss voting fraud that day.

https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2021/01/06/CREC-2021-01-06.pdf

Mr. BIGGS. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of the objection.

The SPEAKER. The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.

Mr. BIGGS. Madam Speaker, I join the objection to counting votes of electors from my home State of Arizona, as well as Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Nevada, because election integrity is the heart of our American constitutional republic? In a representative form of government, we must be able to trust that our elections accurately represent the will of the American voter.

This is the appropriate forum anticipated and provided for by our Founders to debate whether this election complied with the Constitution that we have all sworn to protect. Every particular of the Constitution is to be protected, including Article II, Section 1. The debate as to the legitimacy of the 2020 Presidential election has been suppressed by the left and its propagandists in the media until today.

State legislatures are required to determine the manner in which electors are chosen. Arizona names its electors on the general election ballot and identifies what candidate those electors are required to vote for should that candidate obtain the majority of votes in the general election.

As part of the manner for determining electors, Arizona also establishes deadlines for voter registration. The deadline has been in place for 30 years. b 1345 This year, that voter registration deadline was October 5. Early voting commenced 2 days later. Five days before the deadline, a group filed a lawsuit demanding that Arizona election...

 

[pjmret]

Tens of thousands of conservatives knew what Congress was going to be doing on Jan 6 before Congress had hearings to discuss voting fraud that day.

https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2021/01/06/CREC-2021-01-06.pdf

Mr. BIGGS. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of the objection.

The SPEAKER. The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.

Mr. BIGGS. Madam Speaker, I join the objection to counting votes of electors from my home State of Arizona, as well as Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Nevada, because election integrity is the heart of our American constitutional republic? In a representative form of government, we must be able to trust that our elections accurately represent the will of the American voter.

This is the appropriate forum anticipated and provided for by our Founders to debate whether this election complied with the Constitution that we have all sworn to protect. Every particular of the Constitution is to be protected, including Article II, Section 1. The debate as to the legitimacy of the 2020 Presidential election has been suppressed by the left and its propagandists in the media until today.

State legislatures are required to determine the manner in which electors are chosen. Arizona names its electors on the general election ballot and identifies what candidate those electors are required to vote for should that candidate obtain the majority of votes in the general election.

As part of the manner for determining electors, Arizona also establishes deadlines for voter registration. The deadline has been in place for 30 years. b 1345 This year, that voter registration deadline was October 5. Early voting commenced 2 days later. Five days before the deadline, a group filed a lawsuit demanding that Arizona election...

It wasn't a scheduled hearing on fraud
You lied

And if the goal was to air your concerns, storming the Capitol to interrupt them proves how stupid they are

 

[mark francis]

It wasn't a scheduled hearing on fraud
You lied

And if the goal was to air your concerns, storming the Capitol to interrupt them proves how stupid they are

Never mind. If that is what you want to believe, then just accept the fact they discussed voting fraud evidence anyway.

 

[pjmret]

Never mind. If that is what you want to believe, then just accept the fact they discussed voting fraud evidence anyway.

never mind that you lied? you excuse your lies so easily. sad.

 

[mark francis]

never mind that you lied? you excuse your lies so easily. sad.

Anyone who claimed Congress was not discussing voting fraud on Jan 6 is lying. Anyone who claims they had not planned on having those discussions on that day is lying.

 

[pjmret]

Anyone who claimed Congress was not discussing voting fraud on Jan 6 is lying. Anyone who claims they had not planned on having those discussions on that day is lying.

you said they were "scheduled hearings on fraud", that's a lie.
the schedule was for counting electoral votes.
congressional hearings are something else officially.

god hates when you lie, and even worse, when you deny your lie when caught. lol

 

[Wry Catcher]

Anyone who claimed Congress was not discussing voting fraud on Jan 6 is lying. Anyone who claims they had not planned on having those discussions on that day is lying.

LOL: The Donald began in 2015 the voters were fraud, when he won in 2016 he shut up the election was a fraud; then in 2020 - knowing he was a terrible President - he commenced in the same BS as in 2015; people like you spread the BIG LIES and Conspiracy Fictions of the GOP over and over again.

Well not over and over again, some of those who spread the BIG LIES and Conspiracy Frictions - lawyers and politicians - admitted in Courts (and people like you continue to spread BIG LIES and Conspiracy Fictions on the Insurrection of January 6, 2021).

 

[mark francis]

LOL: The Donald began in 2015 the voters were fraud, when he won in 2016 he shut up the election was a fraud; then in 2020 - knowing he was a terrible President - he commenced in the same BS as in 2015; people like you spread the BIG LIES and Conspiracy Fictions of the GOP over and over again.

Well not over and over again, some of those who spread the BIG LIES and Conspiracy Frictions - lawyers and politicians - admitted in Courts (and people like you continue to spread BIG LIES and Conspiracy Fictions on the Insurrection of January 6, 2021).

Voting fraud evidence is not created by Trump or Republicans, it is created by criminal violations of election laws.

 

[pjmret]

Voting fraud evidence is not created by Trump or Republicans, it is created by criminal violations of election laws.

Let us know when you have evidence credible enough to convince even a single judge so far you have failed for three years but keep trying lol

 

[mark francis]

Let us know when you have evidence credible enough to convince even a single judge so far you have failed for three years but keep trying lol

I don't understand the left's addiction to narratives about judges and opposition to investigations since everyone knows no judge in the country can rule on evidence that cannot be obtained without proper investigations. No proper extensive investigations had been completed before Democrats rammed through Biden's suspect inauguration.