As the human race gets smarter, we should (in theory) converge on an idea about how most things should be done. That our parties are converging isnt necessarily a bad thing. Its only a bad thing if there are alternate points of view that are equally or more valid to consider. While it isnt as fun to debate tomato vs tom-a-to, if we are lucky enough to get to the point where thats the most important difference then horray us. What are the differences that should be debated that arent?