- Feb 4, 2007
I did watch the video.
What you said has nothing to do with it.
...but to sway the logical, reasonable ones who were skeptical of the government's version (justifiably).
It has everything to do with it. The data collected and testimony of those inside the towers does not support the conclusion that the impact of the planes and flaming aviation fuel caused the collapse. The conclusion is in direct contradiction with the facts.
We're skeptical of the government's conclusions because they aren't supported by their own data. A programmed simulation doesn't change that.
Fine, but there is no amout of scientific evidence that will convince you guys.
The 9/11 official report has been upheld by thousands of scientists, physicists, engineers, etc. and you guys are still in denial and that's the problem.
We have the facts. You just have questions.
You can't even be convinced by your own data.
You have preconceived conclusions and opinions which don't fit the data. We have facts which lead to questions no one wants to answer. All of the data and testimony strongly indicates that there was a coordinated attack on the ground as well as in the air.
There is no amount of scientific evidence that would ever convince you.
There are logical answers to every question you can ask. You just have to be willing to accept the answers when they are given.
TVBrain -- you'll be able to find answers to all your questions here:
I've read many of those sites. Will you watch the presentation on the 9 month research done based on the information provided by the flight data recorder of flight 77? Will you watch it?
as for the links. Ive read many of those sites. Maybe since you are more familiar with these sites you could point me in a direct direction to some of my questions.
Im not interested in arguing physics back and forth with links. Im interested in the simpler anomalies of 9/11 and more recently im interested in the confirmed flight path and maneuvers of flight 77. Would you like to watch the presentation i provided? It's quite interesting.
Are you aware of Norman Mineta's testimony?
I'd really rather not waste an hour of my day. What is the basic conclusion of the video?
This is pretty typical of the theorists. "I don't want to talk about the hard evidence [science]. I'd rather just ask questions." Like you say that you're more interested in the anomalies of 9/11, I'm more interested in the logical, reasoning ideological arguments.