Romney The Progressive

I see that you guys finally gave up your illusions of EXTREME RIGHT, TEA PARTY victory. . .and are now willing to start "changing your mind" about the only GOP candidate that might have a chance to defeat Obama!

Progressives like him more than the other candidates. Should he win it would be a replay of the Bush years since Bush was also too progressive.

More importantly I think he is more beatable than the other candidates because conservatives' best argument would have to be only that he is better than Obama. They could never really get enthusiastic about him - that would be a replay too - but this time of the McCain campaign.
 
Werbung:
Progressives like him more than the other candidates. Should he win it would be a replay of the Bush years since Bush was also too progressive.

More importantly I think he is more beatable than the other candidates because conservatives' best argument would have to be only that he is better than Obama. They could never really get enthusiastic about him - that would be a replay too - but this time of the McCain campaign.

I repeat: Romney is the only candidate that will appeal to moderate Republicans and Independents. . .and the very extreme Republicans are not numerous enough to elect ANYONE in a presidential race!

I personally would LOVE to see Bachmann or Santorum, or even Perry win the primaries. . .that would be GREAT!

When even Pat Anderson understand that the GOP cannot win a presidential election based on the stupid ideologies of the extrem right (and the "birthers!") it should at least send warning bells to the GOP!

And when even Jed Bush tells the primary candidates to get off the "birther" issue. . . it seems pretty clear that those extrem candidates are on the WRONG track to win ANYTHING!
 
I repeat: Romney is the only candidate that will appeal to moderate Republicans and Independents. . .and the very extreme Republicans are not numerous enough to elect ANYONE in a presidential race!

I personally would LOVE to see Bachmann or Santorum, or even Perry win the primaries. . .that would be GREAT!

When even Pat Anderson understand that the GOP cannot win a presidential election based on the stupid ideologies of the extrem right (and the "birthers!") it should at least send warning bells to the GOP!

And when even Jed Bush tells the primary candidates to get off the "birther" issue. . . it seems pretty clear that those extrem candidates are on the WRONG track to win ANYTHING!


Pat Anderson ? This one ?
 

No...sorry, I obviously met Pat Robertson. . .that crazy old guy who think that Haiti earthquake was god's punishment to Haiti for "making a deal with the devil" centuries ago!

Pat Robertson Calls Quake 'blessing in Disguise' - YouTube

www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5TE99sAbwM
Jan 13, 2010 - 2 min - Uploaded by AssociatedPress
TV Evangelist Pat Robertson made some unusual observations about ... Pat Robertson, the wealthiest evangelical ...
 
No...sorry, I obviously met Pat Robertson. . .that crazy old guy who think that Haiti earthquake was god's punishment to Haiti for "making a deal with the devil" centuries ago!

Pat Robertson Calls Quake 'blessing in Disguise' - YouTube

www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5TE99sAbwM
Jan 13, 2010 - 2 min - Uploaded by AssociatedPress
TV Evangelist Pat Robertson made some unusual observations about ... Pat Robertson, the wealthiest evangelical ...

obvious ? not really considering pretty much noone pays any attention to him. of course few pay much attention to the GOP chair in Minnesota either.
 
obvious ? not really considering pretty much noone pays any attention to him. of course few pay much attention to the GOP chair in Minnesota either.

"Obvious" because it was widely talked about in every media for the last 2 days at least. . .I guess if you didn't see it, Fox News didn't mention it!

Did you hear Jed Bush's warning to the GOP candidates to get off that new birther revival kick?
 
"Obvious" because it was widely talked about in every media for the last 2 days at least. . .I guess if you didn't see it, Fox News didn't mention it!

Did you hear Jed Bush's warning to the GOP candidates to get off that new birther revival kick?


the birther kick is an invention of the MSM. they love asking thins pointless question as its safer tha n allowing the subject to say anything substantive.

I have a filter where it comes to Pat or Jerry Falwell (while e was alive) as do most Virginians. You would be shocked to know what an embarrassment Falwell was to Lynchberg in general. Kind of like whatever town that Westboro Baptist chrch is in see him.
 
Werbung:
George Will does not like Mitt. Mr. Will makes some very good points in this column...

The Republican presidential dynamic — various candidates rise and recede; Mitt Romney remains at about 25 percent support — is peculiar because conservatives correctly believe that it is important to defeat Barack Obama but unimportant that Romney be president. This is not cognitive dissonance.
Obama, a floundering naif who thinks ATMs aggravate unemployment, is bewildered by a national tragedy of shattered dreams, decaying workforce skills and forgone wealth creation. Romney cannot enunciate a defensible, or even decipherable, ethanol policy.

Last week in Ohio, Romney straddled the issue of the ballot initiative by which liberals and unions hope to repeal the law that Republican Gov. John Kasich got enacted to limit public employees’ collective bargaining rights. Kasich, like Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, is under siege. Romney was asked, at a Republican phone bank rallying support for Kasich’s measure, to oppose repeal of it and to endorse another measure exempting Ohioans from Obamacare’s insurance mandate (a cousin of Romneycare’s Massachusetts mandate). He refused.
His campaign called his refusal principled: “Citizens of states should be able to make decisions . . . on their own.” Got it? People cannot make “their own” decisions if Romney expresses an opinion. His flinch from leadership looks ludicrous after his endorsement three months ago of a right-to-work bill that the New Hampshire legislature was considering. So, the rule in New England expires across the Appalachian Mountains?
A day after refusing to oppose repeal of Kasich’s measure, Romney waffled about his straddle, saying he opposed repeal “110 percent.” He did not, however, endorse the anti-mandate measure, remaining semi-faithful to the trans-Appalachian codicil pertaining to principles, thereby seeming to lack the courage of his absence of convictions.
Romney, supposedly the Republican most electable next November, is a recidivist reviser of his principles who is not only becoming less electable; he might damage GOP chances of capturing the Senate. Republican successes down the ticket will depend on the energies of the Tea Party and other conservatives, who will be deflated by a nominee whose blurry profile in caution communicates only calculated trimming.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will103011.php3

Recidivist Reviser...now that is a very good name for Mitt. Floundering Naif is a perfect description of BO...hahahahaha.....

Mr. Will is a very astute commentator on the political scene. If the Rs nominate this silly progressive, they will have missed a great opportunity. And, Will is likely right that the Senate will not go R with Mitt leading the ticket.

There is no excitement about voting for Mitt other than to get rid of the Skinny Socialist.
 
Back
Top