BlackGarden
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2006
- Messages
- 8
Wasn't quite sure where to put this, but I thought this category suited best.
In the UK, there are a number of very popular tabloid newspapers. The writing style is easy to read, and if only they reported factual news then they'd be a great way for the masses to access current affairs. However, the front pages of these publications often contain headlines that should clearly be somewhere in the middle of a newspaper under the heading "opinion".
Two of these publications are particularly appauling. These are the Daily Mail and the Daily Express. The Express is frequently obsessed with the royal family, and almost every Monday without fail prints a story about Princess Diana (did anybody notice she died nearly 10 years ago?). This is the Express headline from yesterday - as you can see, they also like to slag off Camilla and Muslims when they get a chance.
It's beyond me how they get away with printing this rubbish under the pretence that it is serious journalism. (Unbelievably the day before their main headline was about how cold it would be this winter.)
The Mail is also known as the Daily Hate (think 1984), as nearly every day without fail it tells you what you should be hating today. Their favourite topics of discussion are: gypsies, Muslims, CCTV or any other kind of monitoring of our lives, the Labour Party, taxes, and the new "miracle cure for cancer" (about one per month) which the NHS won't give for free because the science backing it up is distinctly dodgy. Here is an example of the sort of rubbish they get away with presenting as fact:
I haven't been able to find any such story in any non-tabloid newspapers. I don't know where they got their information from, but it seems that the headline is completely false!
I really think something needs to be done to regulate all UK newspapers and ensure that what they print is, well, true, because they shouldn't be allowed to get away with presenting this rubbish to people as fact.
(For more examples of headlines, see http://www.mailwatch.co.uk)
In the UK, there are a number of very popular tabloid newspapers. The writing style is easy to read, and if only they reported factual news then they'd be a great way for the masses to access current affairs. However, the front pages of these publications often contain headlines that should clearly be somewhere in the middle of a newspaper under the heading "opinion".
Two of these publications are particularly appauling. These are the Daily Mail and the Daily Express. The Express is frequently obsessed with the royal family, and almost every Monday without fail prints a story about Princess Diana (did anybody notice she died nearly 10 years ago?). This is the Express headline from yesterday - as you can see, they also like to slag off Camilla and Muslims when they get a chance.
It's beyond me how they get away with printing this rubbish under the pretence that it is serious journalism. (Unbelievably the day before their main headline was about how cold it would be this winter.)
The Mail is also known as the Daily Hate (think 1984), as nearly every day without fail it tells you what you should be hating today. Their favourite topics of discussion are: gypsies, Muslims, CCTV or any other kind of monitoring of our lives, the Labour Party, taxes, and the new "miracle cure for cancer" (about one per month) which the NHS won't give for free because the science backing it up is distinctly dodgy. Here is an example of the sort of rubbish they get away with presenting as fact:
I haven't been able to find any such story in any non-tabloid newspapers. I don't know where they got their information from, but it seems that the headline is completely false!
I really think something needs to be done to regulate all UK newspapers and ensure that what they print is, well, true, because they shouldn't be allowed to get away with presenting this rubbish to people as fact.
(For more examples of headlines, see http://www.mailwatch.co.uk)