The January 6th Indictment Of Spanky Trump!!!!!

[mark francis]

The Geneva Conventions are four treaties, and three additional protocols, that establish international legal standards for humanitarian treatment in war. The singular term Geneva Convention usually denotes the agreements of 1949, negotiated in the aftermath of the Second World War (1939–1945), which updated the terms of the two 1929 treaties and added two new conventions. The Geneva Conventions extensively define the basic rights of wartime prisoners, civilians and military personnel, established protections for the wounded and sick, and provided protections for the civilians in and around a war-zone.[2]

A facsimile of the signature-and-seals page of the 1864 Geneva Convention, that established humane rules of war.The original document in single pages, 1864.[1]
The Geneva Conventions defines the rights and protections afforded to non-combatants who fulfills the criteria of being protected persons.[3] The treaties of 1949 were ratified, in their entirety or with reservations, by 196 countries


Oh no one world government lol it started in 1929!!!!!

The Geneva Convention was signed by Congress, the Paris Agreement was not.

 

[mark francis]

What I do know is you're full of anti democrat conspiracy theories. You're welcome to it

You don't think there is anything wrong with American leftists yielding power to international thugs to dictate policies that Americans are bound by law to accept or suffer the consequences of refusing to accept?

 

[Boris Norris]

You don't think there is anything wrong with American leftists yielding power to international thugs to dictate policies that Americans are bound by law to accept or suffer the consequences of refusing to accept?

I would if it were true

 

[mark francis]

I would if it were true

The dull and ignorant just imagine ruthless fascist world leaders are not serious when they say they are going to make Americans pay for being rich and damaging the eco system.

 

[Boris Norris]

The Paris Agreement was not authorized or signed by Congress, so it is not a binding treaty, even though world leftists claim the US is still subjected to its fascist mandates.

The Paris agreement was not signed by any Congress of any country.
It was signed by a representative of that Congress on their behalf which represents every American.

You didn't object when Trump pestered Ukraine for dirt on Biden without Congress approval.

 

[mark francis]

The Paris agreement was not signed by any Congress of any country.
It was signed by a representative of that Congress on their behalf which represents every American.

You didn't object when Trump pestered Ukraine for dirt on Biden without Congress approval.

No 'treaty' not signed by Congress is binding on Americans.

 

[Boris Norris]

No 'treaty' not signed by Congress is binding on Americans.

Wrong again.
If that were the case, do other agreements need Congress approval to pull out of them?

You're wrong mark so grow up.

 

[pjmret]

The Geneva Convention was signed by Congress, the Paris Agreement was not.

So again the Geneva Conventions are legally binding internationalntraties so they are part of the one world government according to your stupid logic duh

 

[pjmret]

No 'treaty' not signed by Congress is binding on Americans.

Does the Senate have to consent before the U.S. can become a party to these provisions?

No. Article 4 of the Paris agreement doesn't create a new international legal obligation. It reiterates the obligations already contained in Article 4 of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The United States became a party to the Framework Convention after the Senate gave its advice and consent by an overwhelming vote in 1992. That's why legal experts say a new round of Senate advice and consent is not needed. (See here and here.)

 

[mark francis]

Wrong again.
If that were the case, do other agreements need Congress approval to pull out of them?

You're wrong mark so grow up.

I'm not sure what you are asking. Let's point out a few things about the Treaty Clause in the US Constitution.

Treaty Clause - Wikipedia

[The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur...

Although Article II of the Constitution pertains to the executive branch, the Treaty Clause provides that the power to make treaties is shared between the President and the Senate.[31] However, the clause has never been interpreted as giving the Senate the power or duty to advise the President before a treaty is concluded; in practice, the Senate's authority is limited to either disapproving or approving a treaty, with the latter including the power to attach conditions or reservations.[31] ...

Presently, there is no Supreme Court ruling on whether the President has the power to break a treaty without the approval of Congress; it remains unclear which branch of government is empowered by the Constitution to terminate a treaty, much less the procedure for doing so.

 

[mark francis]

So again the Geneva Conventions are legally binding internationalntraties so they are part of the one world government according to your stupid logic duh

Treaties signed by world nations to be enforced by world 'governors' or 'overseers' can be referred to as being enforced by a one-world governing body.

 

[mark francis]

Does the Senate have to consent before the U.S. can become a party to these provisions?

No. Article 4 of the Paris agreement doesn't create a new international legal obligation. It reiterates the obligations already contained in Article 4 of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The United States became a party to the Framework Convention after the Senate gave its advice and consent by an overwhelming vote in 1992. That's why legal experts say a new round of Senate advice and consent is not needed. (See here and here.)

Congress signed onto the 1992 agreement but not to the Paris Agreement. If the Paris Agreement is not the 1992 Agreement then Congress must sign off on it for it to become a new treaty under US law.

 

[pjmret]

Treaties signed by world nations to be enforced by world 'governors' or 'overseers' can be referred to as being enforced by a one-world governing body.

You can refer to them how you like lol
We don't have a one world government or currency moron lol

 

[pjmret]

Congress signed onto the 1992 agreement but not to the Paris Agreement. If the Paris Agreement is not the 1992 Agreement then Congress must sign off on it for it to become a new treaty under US law.

Again legal experts say you are wrong lol

 

[Phoenix68]

The dull and ignorant just imagine ruthless fascist world leaders are not serious when they say they are going to make Americans pay for being rich and damaging the eco system.

.

.
Wrong, again, Reverunt.
.
It's the insurance companies taking the lead, on that one.
.
.
'The Mother of All Risks': Insurance Giants Call on G20 to Stop Bankrolling Fossil Fuels
.
Farmers Insurance has stopped writing Florida policies
.

.​