The Whole Story - Anderson Cooper - The Case Against Spanky Trump

and the appropriate judges didn't refuse evidence they just found it not credible moron. duh
No, I have evidence multiple judges did not even look at the evidence. That proves that rejection of voter fraud cases does not indicate that no fraud occurred.
 
Werbung:
No, I have evidence multiple judges did not even look at the evidence. That proves that rejection of voter fraud cases does not indicate that no fraud occurred.

not all court cases are about the actual evidence moron. for example, appeals do not, they consider legal rulings, not evidence. duh.

nothing proves that "no fraud occurred" moron. you can't prove the negative ,moron.

you keep making that "point" because I guess you want to look like a moron lol
 
not all court cases are about the actual evidence moron. for example, appeals do not, they consider legal rulings, not evidence. duh.

nothing proves that "no fraud occurred" moron. you can't prove the negative ,moron.

you keep making that "point" because I guess you want to look like a moron lol
Court cases that have been dismissed on procedural grounds had nothing to do with the evidence.
 
Court cases that have been dismissed on procedural grounds had nothing to do with the evidence.

true, but of course many cases wee dismissed due to lack of credible evidence.

you lost every single case for every possible reason. not a single judge believed you guys had a case. lol
 
true, but of course many cases wee dismissed due to lack of credible evidence.

you lost every single case for every possible reason. not a single judge believed you guys had a case. lol
Nonsense. Cases were rejected on technical grounds or were rejected on the basis of unproven assumptions about the lack of fraud
 
Nonsense. Cases were rejected on technical grounds or were rejected on the basis of unproven assumptions about the lack of fraud

Humetewa wrote that the plaintiffs were “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” to back up their implausible claims of massive election fraud, which included allegations of foreign espionage along with more mundane accusations of illegally cast ballots.

“Plaintiffs allege that Arizona’s Secretary of State and Governor conspired with various domestic and international actors to manipulate Arizona’s 2020 General Election results allowing Joseph Biden to defeat Donald Trump in the presidential race. The allegations they put forth to support their claims of fraud fail in their particularity and plausibility,” the judge wrote.

you're a moron. lol
 
Just a gentle reminder where we are so far. Still defending it as a peaceful protest Marky? Dickhead.

Heres a cartoon youll love Mark. Little bit of patriotism blended. https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSLQTd3FN/
Humetewa wrote that the plaintiffs were “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” to back up their implausible claims of massive election fraud, which included allegations of foreign espionage along with more mundane accusations of illegally cast ballots.

“Plaintiffs allege that Arizona’s Secretary of State and Governor conspired with various domestic and international actors to manipulate Arizona’s 2020 General Election results allowing Joseph Biden to defeat Donald Trump in the presidential race. The allegations they put forth to support their claims of fraud fail in their particularity and plausibility,” the judge wrote.

you're a moron. lol
Cut him some slack comrade. He consulted his god to get wisdom like that. There's some inbreeding going on in his house.
 
Humetewa wrote that the plaintiffs were “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence” to back up their implausible claims of massive election fraud, which included allegations of foreign espionage along with more mundane accusations of illegally cast ballots.

“Plaintiffs allege that Arizona’s Secretary of State and Governor conspired with various domestic and international actors to manipulate Arizona’s 2020 General Election results allowing Joseph Biden to defeat Donald Trump in the presidential race. The allegations they put forth to support their claims of fraud fail in their particularity and plausibility,” the judge wrote.

you're a moron. lol
Refuting bogus claims of fraud does not qualify as a refutation of other allegations of fraud involving other aspects or types of election fraud. There remain multiple allegations of fraud with credible evidence that have never been refuted.
 
Heres a cartoon youll love Mark. Little bit of patriotism blended. https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSLQTd3FN/

Cut him some slack comrade. He consulted his god to get wisdom like that. There's some inbreeding going on in his house.
Falsely charging innocent American patriots with sedition and denying evidence of fraud that has never been reasonably refuted will never make good people bad for opposing the crimes and depravity of bad people.
 
Falsely charging innocent American patriots with sedition and denying evidence of fraud that has never been reasonably refuted will never make good people bad for opposing the crimes and depravity of bad people.
Of course Marky. My most humblist apologies.
You god-fearing paedophile hypocrites are never wrong.
 
Refuting bogus claims of fraud does not qualify as a refutation of other allegations of fraud involving other aspects or types of election fraud. There remain multiple allegations of fraud with credible evidence that have never been refuted.
No judge found the evidence to be credible moron
You failed lol
 
Falsely charging innocent American patriots with sedition and denying evidence of fraud that has never been reasonably refuted will never make good people bad for opposing the crimes and depravity of bad people.
Juries found them guilty moron
Prove they were falsely charged duh
 
Werbung:
Back
Top