Top 10 reasons why no planes hit the WTC on 9/11/01

[mark francis]

Are you connected to alligators, lizards and snakes by blood, because you also have red blood? You are abysmally ignorant.
Again HUMANS are PRIMATES, and are related to chimps, bonobos, silverbacks and orangutans by a common ancestor.
All mammals are connected by common ancestry. Reptiles are a more distant connection.

When did humans or their evolutionary ancestors first develop umbilical cords? Are humans related to watermelons in spite of the fact that watermelons do not have umbilical cords?

 

[saltydancindave]

Omar knows what 9/11 was. "Some people did some things (hee-hee.)"

View attachment 28321

There's that once is an accident, twice is a coincidence as there are no coincidences while thrice is just business as usual for those crooks on Capital Hill in their burning Bush's thieving US Constitution Bill of Rights arsonists SCOTUS Fourth Reich continuing demotion of a George Washington University Hospital Washington, D.C. born retired businessman & WW II Pentagon Staff Sergeant to Eisenhower of those Trumpanzees Trumpanazis Trumpamengele Nazi economics national religion........

 

[saltydancindave]

Watch the TV news networks lie about planes again!Hottest new 911 Hoax documentation911 Planes had Pentanium Wings!from the Author911Hoax.com Page 2

Top 10 reasons why no planes hit the WTC on 9/11/01

Folks, on 9/11/01 the TV networks lied to the world about planes striking the World Trade Center.

HomeFake, fake, fake! ​

​

Why would CBS, The New York Times, The History Channel, Indmedia.org and YouTube.com be censoring the idea so aggressively if real planes hit the Twin Towers?​

​

​

How was it that flaming flying carpet pseudoscience of Christiananality pedodphilia reasoning as to why no planes hit the WTC on 9/11........

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

When did humans or their evolutionary ancestors first develop umbilical cords? Are humans related to watermelons in spite of the fact that watermelons do not have umbilical cords?

Watermelons are the fruit of watermelon plants, they are seed distribution devices.

We are not fallen angels, we are risen apes.

 

[mark francis]

Watermelons are the fruit of watermelon plants, they are seed distribution devices.

We are not fallen angels, we are risen apes.

Science has all but proven that life could not have originated on earth without a miracle initiated by some extraterrestrial force of some kind.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Science has all but proven that life could not have originated on earth without a miracle initiated by some extraterrestrial force of some kind.

Science is not in the business of proving anything. It is in the business of discovering how the Earth works. Science does not accept explanations of unrepeatable events that are contrary to the laws of physics, which is what miracles are. Science is based on EVIDENCE.

The Earth is 4.5 billion years old. The physical nature of the Earth and its atmosphere have experienced many changes, so we cannot say that the possibility of life has never existed on Earth. Nor can we say that life did not come from outside the Earth.

What science says is that what appear to be miracles simply have explanations that we have not discovered.

Fundie idiots, on the other hand, believe that "God" created the entire vast universe with the purpose of creating life on just one small planet. They believe that God created the Universe out of nothing, but created Adam from dust and Eve from Adam's rib. They also believe in talking snakes and donkeys and the Earth ceasing to rotate so some Hebrews could see better as they demolished their enemies.

It would be difficult to come up with a sillier tale about creation than the one in the Bible. It is easily disproven.

 

[mark francis]

Science is not in the business of proving anything. It is in the business of discovering how the Earth works. Science does not accept explanations of unrepeatable events that are contrary to the laws of physics, which is what miracles are. Science is based on EVIDENCE.

Science cannot 'discover' how original life was formed on earth because science cannot see or measure God.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Science cannot 'discover' how original life was formed on earth because science cannot see or measure God.

IN precisely the same way, science cannot see or measure Frosty the Snowman, Santa Claus, or even Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer.

 

[mark francis]

IN precisely the same way, science cannot see or measure Frosty the Snowman, Santa Claus, or even Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer.

If science cannot prove Santa Claus or the origin of life on earth, then science should not pretend it can.

 

[saltydancindave]

If science cannot prove Santa Claus or the origin of life on earth, then science should not pretend it can.

Since science isn't going to the trouble to prove Santa Claus nor the origin of life on earth then they certainly won't be proving their "it's a Christian Nation fixed elections over the decades.......

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

If science cannot prove Santa Claus or the origin of life on earth, then science should not pretend it can.

The name for what you are doing here is called the Argument from Ignorance.

I don't think that "science" has claimed that it knows the origin of life on Earth or anywhere else.

On the other hand, your simple minded Fundie explanation involves creation of everything ex nihilo --out of nothing, and talking snakes and cursed trees.

 

[mark francis]

The name for what you are doing here is called the Argument from Ignorance.

I don't think that "science" has claimed that it knows the origin of life on Earth or anywhere else.

On the other hand, your simple minded Fundie explanation involves creation of everything ex nihilo --out of nothing, and talking snakes and cursed trees.

You are correct. Science remains ignorant of how life originated on earth because science is incapable of examining and recording God.

 

[saltydancindave]

You are correct. Science remains ignorant of how life originated on earth because science is incapable of examining and recording God.

Fascinating that recording National Archives purchased US Constitution Bill of Rights with receipts which were stolen along with absentee voting ballots renders Christiananality pedophilia as "one nation under God with equal justice under law".......

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

If science cannot prove Santa Claus or the origin of life on earth, then science should not pretend it can.

It is not at all difficult to declare that the entire Universe could not be created ex nihilo, out of nothing. It is easy to prove that the Gospels contradict one another. It is easy to disprove much of the nonsense that is in the Bible. It is easy to prove that there was no eclipse at the time of the crucifixion.

It is easier to accept that the matter, energy and dark matter that comprise the Universe have always existed than to prove that nothing existed at one time but an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, invisible, intangible, odorless entity alone was all that existed.

The Biblical story is easy to disprove. If you could disprove a scientific explanation, it would not prove the Biblical myth to be true.

The origin of life begins when a complex protein manages to duplicate itself. Tihs could have happened on Earth, it could have happen elsewhere and have managed to come to Earth. In a billion years, many possibilities exist, but some are far more likely than others.

The Big Bang was not the beginning of everything: it is merely as far back in time as we can speculate about. It does not mean that prior to the Big Bang, nothing existed.

 

[mark francis]

It is not at all difficult to declare that the entire Universe could not be created ex nihilo, out of nothing. It is easy to prove that the Gospels contradict one another. It is easy to disprove much of the nonsense that is in the Bible. It is easy to prove that there was no eclipse at the time of the crucifixion.

It is easier to accept that the matter, energy and dark matter that comprise the Universe have always existed than to prove that nothing existed at one time but an omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, invisible, intangible, odorless entity alone was all that existed.

The Biblical story is easy to disprove. If you could disprove a scientific explanation, it would not prove the Biblical myth to be true.

The origin of life begins when a complex protein manages to duplicate itself. Tihs could have happened on Earth, it could have happen elsewhere and have managed to come to Earth. In a billion years, many possibilities exist, but some are far more likely than others.

The Big Bang was not the beginning of everything: it is merely as far back in time as we can speculate about. It does not mean that prior to the Big Bang, nothing existed.

Believing the universe suddenly emerged from nothing with no catalyst, no intelligence, no plan, and no scientific possibility is preposterous.