You are allowed to analyze thingsIf your legal system does not allow you to reasonably analyze and discuss clear evidence of fraud, then your unsupported denials of voter fraud have no credibility.
God you are stupid lol
You are allowed to analyze thingsIf your legal system does not allow you to reasonably analyze and discuss clear evidence of fraud, then your unsupported denials of voter fraud have no credibility.
No it's how our legal system has always worked *****I know how it works under stolen Democrat leadership. Patriotic Americans who object to Democrat crime and corruption will be arrested and jailed to the fullest extent of leftist interpretation of laws.
The fact that election officials under suspicion of committing election fraud are allowed to obstruct investigations into fraud in any fashion is inexcusable.You are allowed to analyze things
God you are stupid lol
massive amounts of evidence of election fraud have been provided and the officials under suspicion who cannot deny or refute the evidence propagate the foolish worthless narrative that fraud has not been proven and yet Democrats refuse to discuss the evidence because it has not been proven by examination and discussion.No it's how our legal system has always worked *****
Burden of proof is on the accuser
well it hasn't been proven, *****.massive amounts of evidence of election fraud have been provided and the officials under suspicion who cannot deny or refute the evidence propagate the foolish worthless narrative that fraud has not been proven and yet Democrats refuse to discuss the evidence because it has not been proven by examination and discussion.
The fact that election officials under suspicion of committing election fraud are allowed to obstruct investigations into fraud in any fashion is inexcusable.
The fact that election officials under suspicion of committing election fraud are allowed to obstruct investigations into fraud in any fashion is inexcusable.
You do not understand how big the problem is. The fact that judges refused to take cases in maybe 5% of the total number of voter fraud claims needing to be resolved proves nothing. Furthermore, judges don't do investigations so claiming nobody should attempt to investigate voter fraud because that is the judge's job is completely bonkers.well it hasn't been proven, *****.
that's the job of judges, and they agree you didn't prove it.
your job is to prove it and you failed. duh
duh.
god you're stupid. lol
GA officials refused to investigate voting discrepancy issues raised in the days and weeks just after the 2020 election, even after being repeatedly asked for input from election officials. Those officials who refused to do anything about clear problems with machine counts in GA are guilty of the worse sort of corruption by allowing the Soros-backed DA to charge Republican officials for investigating possible voting crimes GA officials refused to acknowledge or look into.who obstructed anything illegally *****?
name them and show how what they did was illegal, *****.
Part 3: Fani Willis Has a Problem. She's Investigating the Wrong People. | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian LupoClaims only. More bullshyt.
Of course she is.Part 3: Fani Willis Has a Problem. She's Investigating the Wrong People. | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo
Part 3: Fani Willis Has a Problem. She’s Investigating the Wrong People.
By Brian Lupo Aug. 28, 2023 11:45 am
Name the official and show credible proof a valid issue was raised and they refused to look at itGA officials refused to investigate voting discrepancy issues raised in the days and weeks just after the 2020 election, even after being repeatedly asked for input from election officials. Those officials who refused to do anything about clear problems with machine counts in GA are guilty of the worse sort of corruption by allowing the Soros-backed DA to charge Republican officials for investigating possible voting crimes GA officials refused to acknowledge or look into.