Well well well.

[mark francis]

Hahaha

You have been caught in a lie and won't admit it
A real Christian would
But you are a fake one
Like everyone knows

Peters was arrested for preserving evidence of fraud and you keep avoiding the fact.

 

[pjmret]

Everyone knows voting machines are vulnerable to corruption and error. With so many reports of possible errors Democrats prove themselves evil for jailing those who examine the machines without their approval.

Democratic senators warned of potential 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 election | Washington Examiner

Democratic senators warned of potential 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 election

by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor |
| November 13, 2020 04:48 PM
Four congressional Democrats sent a letter to the owners of Dominion Voting Systems and cited several problems that “threaten the integrity of our elections,” including “vote switching.”

Potential. Duh

Peters was arrested for preserving evidence of fraud and you keep avoiding the fact.

no, she wasn't. she was arrested for unauthorized access of voting machines. I clearly addresssed it *****.
you can't just access machines because you are unhappy, that violates state laws about chain of custody, *****.

if she wanted to do it LEGALLY she needed to have gone through courts, not commited crimes.

god you're stupid. lol

and a proven liar

 

[mark francis]

Potential. Duh

Democrats complain to Dominion that their machines are vulnerable to fraud. That was before the 2020 election. After the 2020 election Democrats have jailed officials like Peters for examining the machine for 2020 fraud. Go figger.

no, she wasn't. she was arrested for unauthorized access of voting machines. I clearly addresssed it *****.

if she wanted to do it LEGALLY she needed to have gone through courts, not commited crimes.

god you're stupid. lol

and a proven liar

Democrats are not going to authorize investigations into their voting machines, and they will "by god" arrest anyone who does.

 

[pjmret]

You still do not prove evidence of voting fraud does not mean voting fraud occurred.

why would i worry about proving that? lol.

all i care about is that your "evidence" wasn't credible enough to convince a single judge, including republican ones appointed by trump himself. lol

 

[pjmret]

Democrats complain to Dominion that their machines are vulnerable to fraud. That was before the 2020 election. After the 2020 election Democrats have jailed officials like Peters for examining the machine for 2020 fraud. Go figger.

Democrats are not going to authorize investigations into their voting machines, and they will "by god" arrest anyone who does.

all judges are democrats *****? no? lol.

and i dont see why they wouldn't authorize it if the evidence was there, feel free to prove they wouldnt

oh wait you're a proven liar, you wont lol

 

[pjmret]

Democrats complain to Dominion that their machines are vulnerable to fraud. That was before the 2020 election. After the 2020 election Democrats have jailed officials like Peters for examining the machine for 2020 fraud. Go figger.

Democrats are not going to authorize investigations into their voting machines, and they will "by god" arrest anyone who does.

peters was arrested for violating state laws on chain of custody of voting machines *****. lol.
the laws that apply to everyone. duh

you're a *****. go figger.

 

[mark francis]

why would i worry about proving that? lol.

all i care about is that your "evidence" wasn't credible enough to convince a single judge, including republican ones appointed by trump himself. lol

Don't worry about trying to prove evidence of fraud does not mean no fraud took place.

 

[mark francis]

all judges are democrats *****? no? lol.

and i dont see why they wouldn't authorize it if the evidence was there, feel free to prove they wouldnt

oh wait you're a proven liar, you wont lol

You don't ignore evidence of fraud by claiming it must not be investigated because no investigation has yet demonstrated the evidence is irrefutable.

 

[pjmret]

Don't worry about trying to prove evidence of fraud does not mean no fraud took place.

i don't worry about it, lying *****. lol

you morons need to worry about convincing judges that fraud took place.
and you failed every single time...you have a "perfect" record! lol

 

[pjmret]

You don't ignore evidence of fraud by claiming it must not be investigated because no investigation has yet demonstrated the evidence is irrefutable.

who said something "must not be investigated" *****?

you are free to investigate anything..in a legal manner of course. not in a criminal way.

 

[mark francis]

peters was arrested for violating state laws on chain of custody of voting machines *****. lol.
the laws that apply to everyone. duh

you're a *****. go figger.

Nonsense. She preserved voting machine data she said demonstrated evidence of voting machine corruption after the election supervisor ordered the incriminating data to be erased, like Hillary smashing her phones with a hammer.

 

[pjmret]

Nonsense. She preserved voting machine data she said demonstrated evidence of voting machine corruption after the election supervisor ordered the incriminating data to be erased, like Hillary smashing her phones with a hammer.

so what did the judge rule when she asked for a restraining order to preserve the data?
oh wait, she just took the law into her own hands and committed crimes. lol.

 

[pjmret]

Nonsense. She preserved voting machine data she said demonstrated evidence of voting machine corruption after the election supervisor ordered the incriminating data to be erased, like Hillary smashing her phones with a hammer.

but no, not nonsense. she broke the law, that's irrefutable. she just thinks she is above the law, like so many hateful anti-american right wing morons.

 

[mark francis]

i don't worry about it, lying *****. lol

you morons need to worry about convincing judges that fraud took place.
and you failed every single time...you have a "perfect" record! lol

Why try to convince a judge to risk his job, his reputation, his future, and his circle of friends by going against the generally accepted mob opinion of the compromised group of government officials called "the swamp?" The leftist MSM has instructed that questioning voter fraud is tantamount to treason so no judge wants to risk taking up fraud in his court when the facts may come out in trial that fraud did take place.

 

[mark francis]

who said something "must not be investigated" *****?

you are free to investigate anything..in a legal manner of course. not in a criminal way.

What Democrat has ever said "Fraud must be investigated to prove to the American people that no significant fraud took place?" Not one, to my knowledge, which is telling.

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect – If Investigators Touch Them They Will Need to Be Replaced – Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines (thegatewaypundit.com)

2-9-222-9-22

What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect – If Investigators Touch Them They Will Need to Be Replaced – Demand Rudy Giuliani Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines