Well well well.

What Democrat has ever said "Fraud must be investigated to prove to the American people that no significant fraud took place?" Not one, to my knowledge, which is telling.

no democrat has said that, and no one intelligent would, but of course you would think that, being a lying *****. life doesn't work that way. those who claim fraud occurred must prove it.

it is "telling" in that democrats are intelligent and understand how things work. republicans are morons and don't
 
Werbung:
Why try to convince a judge to risk his job, his reputation, his future, and his circle of friends by going against the generally accepted mob opinion of the compromised group of government officials called "the swamp?" The leftist MSM has instructed that questioning voter fraud is tantamount to treason so no judge wants to risk taking up fraud in his court when the facts may come out in trial that fraud did take place.

so you claim. without any proof that's the case. lol.

republican judges in red states were afraid of ruling in favor of trump? you're a *****. lol
 
so what did the judge rule when she asked for a restraining order to preserve the data?
oh wait, she just took the law into her own hands and committed crimes. lol.
Never, I repeat, never disobey an order to erase data on a voting machine after a suspect election if you do not want the wrath of the Democrat party falling on your head and making you "pay the price" for rebelling against Democrats.

https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-roe-v-wade-pay-price-comment-1713964
Schumer Telling Brett Kavanaugh He'll 'Pay the Price' for Roe Resurfaces
 
Never, I repeat, never disobey an order to erase data on a voting machine after a suspect election if you do not want the wrath of the Democrat party falling on your head and making you "pay the price" for rebelling against Democrats.

https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-roe-v-wade-pay-price-comment-1713964
Schumer Telling Brett Kavanaugh He'll 'Pay the Price' for Roe Resurfaces

so what happened when she went to a judge to get a restraining order?
oh that's right, she didnt she was a lazy entitled ***** republican who thinks she was above the law. lol
 
Never, I repeat, never disobey an order to erase data on a voting machine after a suspect election if you do not want the wrath of the Democrat party falling on your head and making you "pay the price" for rebelling against Democrats.

https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-roe-v-wade-pay-price-comment-1713964
Schumer Telling Brett Kavanaugh He'll 'Pay the Price' for Roe Resurfaces

An investigation into potential election fraud claims concluded human error — not a malicious actor — was the cause of anomalies in Mesa County’s vote tabulation system.

Mesa County’s District Attorney Dan Rubinstein ordered the investigation into a report made by supporters of Clerk and Recorder Tina Peters, based on their analysis of images of the county’s Dominion Voting Systems hard drives.

Election fraud conspiracy theorists have released three reports purporting to find evidence of misdeeds in the hard drive data, which Peters allowed an unauthorized person to copy from her office’s machines last year. Rubinstein looked into the third report because he said it was the only one to allege criminal conduct, in this case “potentially unauthorized and illegal manipulation of tabulated vote data during the 2020 General Election and 2021 Grand Junction Municipal Election.”

However, in his presentation to Mesa County Commissioners Thursday, Rubinstein, a Republican, said his investigation found no evidence that the vote counts in either election were incomplete or improper, and that system anomalies during both elections were due to human error.

“We have found extensive evidence that the conclusions in Report 3 are false. Finally, and most significantly, this investigation uncovered no evidence that would indicated(sic) outside interference with the election,” his report states.

so there were investigations...intelligent republians knew she was stupid. lol
 
Never, I repeat, never disobey an order to erase data on a voting machine after a suspect election if you do not want the wrath of the Democrat party falling on your head and making you "pay the price" for rebelling against Democrats.

https://www.newsweek.com/chuck-schumer-brett-kavanaugh-roe-v-wade-pay-price-comment-1713964
Schumer Telling Brett Kavanaugh He'll 'Pay the Price' for Roe Resurfaces


btw what was this "order to erase data" you keep talking about. please quote it.
 
Everyone knows voting machines are vulnerable to corruption and error. With so many reports of possible errors Democrats prove themselves evil for jailing those who examine the machines without their approval.

Democratic senators warned of potential 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 election | Washington Examiner

Democratic senators warned of potential 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines prior to 2020 election

by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor |
| November 13, 2020 04:48 PM
Four congressional Democrats sent a letter to the owners of Dominion Voting Systems and cited several problems that “threaten the integrity of our elections,” including “vote switching.”
Potential. Duh
 
but no, not nonsense. she broke the law, that's irrefutable. she just thinks she is above the law, like so many hateful anti-american right wing morons.
She disobeyed a Democrat order to erase data from voting machines and violated Democrat policy by preserving evidence of fraud on voting machines. She was charged with a smorgasbord of other charges that have little to do with what the real issue that she violated Democrat rules protecting voting machines from examinations by non-Democrat-approved examiners.

Transcript of allegation brought by Democrats:

INTRODUCTION Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters and Deputy Clerk Belinda Knisley jeopardized the security of Mesa County’s 2021 election. They deliberately violated the Secretary of State’s Election Rules and supervisory directives issued pursuant to the Election Code that were designed to ensure the county’s voting machines are secure.

The Colorado Democrat Election code was designed and written by former Obama voting fraud protection official, Jena Griswold.


Jena Griswold
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jena Marie Griswold (born October 2, 1984) is an American attorney and politician from the state of Colorado. A Democrat, she is the 39th Colorado Secretary of State, serving since January 8, 2019.[1]

Early life and career[edit]
Griswold was born in Toledo, Ohio,[2] and moved to Estes Park, Colorado at the age of 10. She graduated from Estes Park High School in 2002. She graduated from Whitman College magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in Politics and Spanish Literature in 2006.[1] She graduated from the University of Pennsylvania Law School with a Juris Doctor in 2011.[3] In 2006, Griswold was awarded the Watson Foundation Fellowship,[4] and in 2009, the Penn Law International Human Rights Fellowship.

Griswold moved to Washington, D.C. in 2011,[5] and worked for President Barack Obama's 2012 campaign as a voter protection attorney.[6] In 2013, Governor John Hickenlooper appointed her to be his liaison to the federal government.[7]
 
btw what was this "order to erase data" you keep talking about. please quote it.

The Dominion machines had built-in programs for erasing data after an election in direct violation of federal election laws. Peters photo-copied the data before it was erased, and that is what angered Democrats so much they brought charges against her.
1690208841171.webp
 
Democrats had previously admitted the machines had potential to be corrupted which is why they adamantly objected to anyone examining them after the stolen 2020 election.

that's why? you can prove it? no? lol.
you're a lying *****.
 
The Dominion machines had built-in programs for erasing data after an election in direct violation of federal election laws. Peters photo-copied the data before it was erased, and that is what angered Democrats so much they brought charges against her.
View attachment 5742

lol, even if they have a built-in program to erase data, you were talking about an executive order to erase data, *****.

show me that executive order *****
 
She disobeyed a Democrat order to erase data from voting machines and violated Democrat policy by preserving evidence of fraud on voting machines. She was charged with a smorgasbord of other charges that have little to do with what the real issue that she violated Democrat rules protecting voting machines from examinations by non-Democrat-approved examiners.

Transcript of allegation brought by Democrats:

INTRODUCTION Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters and Deputy Clerk Belinda Knisley jeopardized the security of Mesa County’s 2021 election. They deliberately violated the Secretary of State’s Election Rules and supervisory directives issued pursuant to the Election Code that were designed to ensure the county’s voting machines are secure.

The Colorado Democrat Election code was designed and written by former Obama voting fraud protection official, Jena Griswold.


Jena Griswold
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jena Marie Griswold (born October 2, 1984) is an American attorney and politician from the state of Colorado. A Democrat, she is the 39th Colorado Secretary of State, serving since January 8, 2019.[1]

Early life and career[edit]
Griswold was born in Toledo, Ohio,[2] and moved to Estes Park, Colorado at the age of 10. She graduated from Estes Park High School in 2002. She graduated from Whitman College magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in Politics and Spanish Literature in 2006.[1] She graduated from the University of Pennsylvania Law School with a Juris Doctor in 2011.[3] In 2006, Griswold was awarded the Watson Foundation Fellowship,[4] and in 2009, the Penn Law International Human Rights Fellowship.

Griswold moved to Washington, D.C. in 2011,[5] and worked for President Barack Obama's 2012 campaign as a voter protection attorney.[6] In 2013, Governor John Hickenlooper appointed her to be his liaison to the federal government.[7]


what "democrat order" *****?
she disobeyed state laws and procedures..many of them, *****.
laws about identity theft, chain of custody, etc. these aren't "democrat orders" *****.
 
Werbung:
lol, even if they have a built-in program to erase data, you were talking about an executive order to erase data, *****.

show me that executive order *****
I did not read all 146 pages of the professional report detailing the flaws, error, and corruption uncovered in the Dominion machines and in the deliberate actions of officials seeking to keep those flaws, errors, mistakes, and fraud from coming out, so I do not have the exact details of that part of the report. However, it is revealing that Democrats do not attack the details of the report but instead attack the person who inspired the report, giving rise to the logical conclusion that Democrats are attempting to smear the facts of the report they cannot refute by demonizing the authors of the report.
 
Back
Top