What level of threat do these people or entities pose to America? (1 - 10 scale with 10 = Worst or Highest threat)

What happened 9/11/2001 is still assaulting our civil liberties today. The so called Patriot act was supported by 99% of the US senate. Only one senator(Feingold Wisc.) voted against it.

The mentality of most Americans was that you shan't complain if you are not a terrorist. Who cares if the government listens in on your phone calls or moniters your bank accounts? If you are not one of those terrorists you have nothing to hide!

We are raising generations of slaves in this country.
 
Werbung:
This is a first amendment auditor who calls himself "Mass accountability". He engages in 100% legal and lawful activity(Filming and recording in public(Governor's house)) on a public sidewalk yet the police get called and the cop harasses him, invades his space and asked for his name. The cop admitted, admitted what he was doing was legal but still bothers him.


Mass rides him about not wearing a mask because that is one of the things they use to try kick auditors out of public buildings and public spaces.

The assault on our civil liberties is real and they are able to do this under the lie that it is for the common good.
asking questions is a violating of his rights in any way
 
I would not say that.
I dint think so. I worked for a College for years and anytime I ran across some one who looked like they did not belong. I investigated it
I have run across convicted sex offenders drug addicts reporters secret service agents atf agents gang members tourist etc. Its normal to wonder what a person is doing if they are filming you or others .
 
I associate BLM with the general cancerous race ideology of this country. It is an organized product of that.

The ideology and everything that comes with it like Black hate and white guilt is the cancer.
Your voice means little to casual readers.

But, if you can convince those just passing by to read or watch a comment, quote or YouTube video of a respected or neutral 3rd person source who says what you have said, it will be more persuasive, I think.
 
What happened 9/11/2001 is still assaulting our civil liberties today. The so called Patriot act was supported by 99% of the US senate. Only one senator(Feingold Wisc.) voted against it.

The mentality of most Americans was that you shan't complain if you are not a terrorist. Who cares if the government listens in on your phone calls or moniters your bank accounts? If you are not one of those terrorists you have nothing to hide!

We are raising generations of slaves in this country.
When the Patriot Act was passed, our government and our people were still operating under traditional assumptions that the gubmint was still sufficiently trustworthy that we wouldn't have to question their having this power.

The Leftists who hijacked the DNC in the 1990's and then went on to exploit their gains in the 2000's by conquering the media and gaining control of our minds and manipulating us to hate the Right, have enslaved us and they were able to achieve success in part due to the boiled frog syndrome.

If you raise the heat of the water slowly enough, the frog wont notice it is being boiled.
 
When the Patriot Act was passed, our government and our people were still operating under traditional assumptions that the gubmint was still sufficiently trustworthy that we wouldn't have to question their having this power.

The Leftists who hijacked the DNC in the 1990's and then went on to exploit their gains in the 2000's by conquering the media and gaining control of our minds and manipulating us to hate the Right, have enslaved us and they were able to achieve success in part due to the boiled frog syndrome.

If you raise the heat of the water slowly enough, the frog wont notice it is being boiled.
You DO go on with some rubbish.
Conquering the media?
Don't make me vomit.
 
Your voice means little to casual readers.

But, if you can convince those just passing by to read or watch a comment, quote or YouTube video of a respected or neutral 3rd person source who says what you have said, it will be more persuasive, I think.

Those other sources are the ones quoting me. My wife is insistent that is true.

In any event I prefer to think for myself rather than drone some talking points I got from somebody else.
 
When the Patriot Act was passed, our government and our people were still operating under traditional assumptions that the gubmint was still sufficiently trustworthy that we wouldn't have to question their having this power.

The Leftists who hijacked the DNC in the 1990's and then went on to exploit their gains in the 2000's by conquering the media and gaining control of our minds and manipulating us to hate the Right, have enslaved us and they were able to achieve success in part due to the boiled frog syndrome.

If you raise the heat of the water slowly enough, the frog wont notice it is being boiled.

That post makes no sense. So you do not trust the government but want to keep giving them more power?

I trust the government less with each passing decade. How can you say you don't agree with that?

The benefit of a guy like Trump is that he pushed all the scum bags into each other's arms. It is not about party or left and right. The Cheney's and the Bush's are no different than Biden or the Clintons. When Trump attacked Jeb Bush and that idiot war in Iraq he was attacking a whole establishment. They want to use a crisis to gain power and money for themselves.
 
I dint think so. I worked for a College for years and anytime I ran across some one who looked like they did not belong. I investigated it
I have run across convicted sex offenders drug addicts reporters secret service agents atf agents gang members tourist etc. Its normal to wonder what a person is doing if they are filming you or others .

So you prefer a society where law enforcement views almost every person as a criminal who needs to prove they are innocent? We are like a dictatorship where people engaging in lawful behavior need to be treated like criminals?

Having a camera on a sidewalk is not a crime. If the cop wants to monitor the person from a distance and watch them that is fine. The cop only backed off the guy when he held his ground and knew his rights. There are cameras everywhere!

How many times has a cop lied to somebody that they have to hand him their ID or information simply because he asked? Doesn't matter if it violates the 4th amendment.
 
This was a thread started in 2010 that was completely accurate. Whenever democrats and republicans agree it usually involves reducing our rights and freedoms and empowering the elite.

 
That post makes no sense. So you do not trust the government but want to keep giving them more power?

I trust the government less with each passing decade. How can you say you don't agree with that?

The benefit of a guy like Trump is that he pushed all the scum bags into each other's arms. It is not about party or left and right. The Cheney's and the Bush's are no different than Biden or the Clintons. When Trump attacked Jeb Bush and that idiot war in Iraq he was attacking a whole establishment. They want to use a crisis to gain power and money for themselves.
You shouldn't hide your Middle Eastern orientation.

The war in Iraq was prompted by Saddam Hussein.

To keep Iran from invading Iraq in continuance of their decade long war, which killed a million men on both sides, Saddam led the Iranians (and the world) to believe he had chemical or biological or nuclear/dirty weapons of mass destruction. The result of this was to keep the Iranians in Iran.

Unfortunately, he failed to consider the unintended effect his ruse might have on other world leaders.

To prevent Saddam from possibly killing millions of Middle Easterners and disrupting the geopolitical balance of power, industry and economics, the United States led the build up to force Saddam to convince all the rest of us on EARTH that he posed no threat.

He didn't.

And that is what prompted the war.

And of course, you dont believe me. That's why I always post what I can prove with links or articles, images some kind or videos.

CBS 60 Minutes did an interview with the FBI agent who interrogated Saddam for several months before the former dictator was executed.

George Piro.

01/27/08: Saddam's Confessions (CBS 60 Minutes)

 
So you prefer a society where law enforcement views almost every person as a criminal who needs to prove they are innocent? We are like a dictatorship where people engaging in lawful behavior need to be treated like criminals?

Having a camera on a sidewalk is not a crime. If the cop wants to monitor the person from a distance and watch them that is fine. The cop only backed off the guy when he held his ground and knew his rights. There are cameras everywhere!

How many times has a cop lied to somebody that they have to hand him their ID or information simply because he asked? Doesn't matter if it violates the 4th amendment.
nope i do not. I prefer the law to be suspicious and observant and to investigate.
When I work for the school I had a duty to the students to protect them and look after them then to the school's property.
No having a camera on the side walk is not a crime but I would investigate it . why you ask ? Is the person with the camera pervert taking pictures of women or is he perhaps a person interested in taking pictures because he plans on doing some type of illegal action such as breaking in or is he following someone has plans of attacking them or perhaps harassing them it's called reasonable suspicion and that's one of the policeman's job is to do to investigate and see what's going on. Im sure if I was infront of you home taking pictures you would want to know why ? Tell me I am wrong.
 
Werbung:
nope i do not. I prefer the law to be suspicious and observant and to investigate.
When I work for the school I had a duty to the students to protect them and look after them then to the school's property.
No having a camera on the side walk is not a crime but I would investigate it . why you ask ? Is the person with the camera pervert taking pictures of women or is he perhaps a person interested in taking pictures because he plans on doing some type of illegal action such as breaking in or is he following someone has plans of attacking them or perhaps harassing them it's called reasonable suspicion and that's one of the policeman's job is to do to investigate and see what's going on. Im sure if I was infront of you home taking pictures you would want to know why ? Tell me I am wrong.
A side note: While reading your post, I was reminded SLIGHTLY of this episode (#49) of the Dick Wolfe TV series, FBI. (March 9, 2021)

and see what's going on. Im sure if I was infront of you home taking pictures you would want to know why ? Tell me I am wrong.
A side note: While reading your post, I was reminded SLIGHTLY of this episode of FBI. #49 "Walk the Line"


A car bomb detonates in a street after another car with a loudspeaker causes a distraction a block away. After some initial investigation, the FBI narrows in on a suspect pool of a Middle Eastern restaurant owner, Hassan Ali, and his associates. Rina Trenholm steps into to assist, calling on an informant of hers, Vega Assad, to help but he surprisingly refuses. They convince him otherwise in exchange for full citizenship, but he again backs down. O. A. struggles to satisfy the bureau and protect Vega simultaneously. Via Ali's restaurant security footage, they discover the real suspect, Philip Stafford, whose business was filed for bankruptcy. They corner him after he narrows down his sister-in-law as his next target. Stafford resists, and is shot by Scola. Castille and Trenholm confront O. A. about the Vega operation, and he is sent to arrest him prior to subsequent deportation
 
Back
Top