Why Are The Vaxxed Getting Sicker???? Wake Up People

Trump ordered Fauci to stop funding the Wuhan lab and yet Fauci did not obey. Fauci received millions in unjust royalties from drug companies he was thus motivated to promote during the dempanic.
Initially Trump funded it. It's a fact idiot.
The money is allocated by Congress, NOT FAUCI. He couldn't possibly disobey.

You have no evidence about royalties. You are a liar.
 
Werbung:
Lol quack says dumb things and some people believe him.
You cannot refute truth but you can pretend it is a lie and join millions of other rubes who refuse to believe anything not dictated by lying leftist mob propaganda.
 
Initially Trump funded it. It's a fact idiot.
The money is allocated by Congress, NOT FAUCI. He couldn't possibly disobey.

You have no evidence about royalties. You are a liar.


Fauci fought Trump order to cancel grant linked to Wuhan lab (nypost.com)

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and

Fauci fought Trump order to cancel research grant linked to Wuhan lab

By
Jackie Salo
June 24, 2021 10:50am

Dr. Anthony Fauci fought orders from the Trump administration to revoke a research grant to a nonprofit linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology — only to “reluctantly agree” after it was implied that his job might be on the line, according to a new book.

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director and his colleagues grappled with how to respond to the request in April 2020 to withhold the remaining $369,819 balance for nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance’s project studying coronaviruses, according to the forthcoming book, “Nightmare Scenario: Inside the Trump Administration’s Response to the Pandemic That Changed History.”

“On the afternoon of April 24, [National Institutes of Health] director Francis Collins and Fauci received notice that Trump wanted to formally announce in a 5:00 p.m. press conference that the grant had been terminated,” the authors, Washington Post reporters Yasmeen Abutaleb and Damian Paletta, wrote in an excerpt obtained by Fox News.

Dr. Anthony Fauci “reluctantly agreed” to revoke the lab’s research grant after it was implied that his job was on the line.Getty Images

“Nightmare Scenario” reveals that Dr. Anthony Fauci revoked a research grant only after it was implied that his job might be on the line.
 
Fauci fought Trump order to cancel grant linked to Wuhan lab (nypost.com)

Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, and

Fauci fought Trump order to cancel research grant linked to Wuhan lab

By
Jackie Salo
June 24, 2021 10:50am

Dr. Anthony Fauci fought orders from the Trump administration to revoke a research grant to a nonprofit linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology — only to “reluctantly agree” after it was implied that his job might be on the line, according to a new book.

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director and his colleagues grappled with how to respond to the request in April 2020 to withhold the remaining $369,819 balance for nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance’s project studying coronaviruses, according to the forthcoming book, “Nightmare Scenario: Inside the Trump Administration’s Response to the Pandemic That Changed History.”

“On the afternoon of April 24, [National Institutes of Health] director Francis Collins and Fauci received notice that Trump wanted to formally announce in a 5:00 p.m. press conference that the grant had been terminated,” the authors, Washington Post reporters Yasmeen Abutaleb and Damian Paletta, wrote in an excerpt obtained by Fox News.

Dr. Anthony Fauci “reluctantly agreed” to revoke the lab’s research grant after it was implied that his job was on the line.Getty Images

“Nightmare Scenario” reveals that Dr. Anthony Fauci revoked a research grant only after it was implied that his job might be on the line.
That's right but you said he disobeyed. It was legislated and FAUCI could do nothing about it.

Do you think the funding has been reinstated?
 
That's right but you said he disobeyed. It was legislated and FAUCI could do nothing about it.

Do you think the funding has been reinstated?
Obama also moved to shut down the Wuhan funding, but Fauci kept it going because he was getting money for doing so.
 
Can you prove he was personally getting money because I know you can't.
Was Fauci getting paid royalties from companies because he was in charge of the patent process and immorally took the royalties to himself rather than allow the researchers who developed the medicines to receive them? I think that is how he was operating, and it made him complicit in the companies' push for profits over considerations for the health of the people receiving the poorly tested medicines.

Fauci cannot hide the fact but he does convince rubes that he is such a good guy and generous that he donates all his millions extorted from drug companies to charity. However, don't ask the disreputable liar to prove that is what he does or why that should even matter. He takes the money and that is dirty enough no matter why he says he takes it or what he says he does with it.

Some Posts About NIH Royalties Omit Fauci Statement That He Donates His Payments - FactCheck.org 5-20-22
Some Posts About NIH Royalties Omit Fauci Statement That He Donates His Payments

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Fauci, Collins received 58 royalty payments as NIH collected $325 million from companies: records | Just The News
Fauci, Collins received 58 royalty payments as NIH collected $325 million from companies: records
 
Was Fauci getting paid royalties from companies because he was in charge of the patent process and immorally took the royalties to himself rather than allow the researchers who developed the medicines to receive them? I think that is how he was operating, and it made him complicit in the companies' push for profits over considerations for the health of the people receiving the poorly tested medicines.

Fauci cannot hide the fact but he does convince rubes that he is such a good guy and generous that he donates all his millions extorted from drug companies to charity. However, don't ask the disreputable liar to prove that is what he does or why that should even matter. He takes the money and that is dirty enough no matter why he says he takes it or what he says he does with it.

Some Posts About NIH Royalties Omit Fauci Statement That He Donates His Payments - FactCheck.org 5-20-22
Some Posts About NIH Royalties Omit Fauci Statement That He Donates His Payments

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Fauci, Collins received 58 royalty payments as NIH collected $325 million from companies: records | Just The News
Fauci, Collins received 58 royalty payments as NIH collected $325 million from companies: records

so you've appointed yourself judge of morality for something you know nothing about? lol.

or tell me about your qualifications to judge royalty payments in health care...lol
 
so you've appointed yourself judge of morality for something you know nothing about? lol.

or tell me about your qualifications to judge royalty payments in health care...lol
It seems to me I know a whole lot more about Fauci's corruption than you do.

Here are more facts that should be considered:

NIH Hides $350M in Royalty Payments, Including Ones Made to Fauci | Newsmax.com 5-15-22

Three top NIH officials getting fat royalty payments from the hundreds of millions of dollars in royalties were:

Agency officials receiving royalties include:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), whose 2021 taxpayer-funded salary was $456,028. He received 23 royalty payments.

Dr. Francis Collins, the agency's head from 2009 to 2021, whose 2021 taxpayer-funded salary was $203,500. He received 14 royalty payments.

Dr. H. Clifford Lane, Fauci's deputy at the NIAID, whose 2021 taxpayer-funded salary was $325,287. He received eight payments.
 
Last edited:
Werbung:
It seems to me I know a whole lot more about Fauci's corruption than you do.

Here are more facts that should be considered:

NIH Hides $350M in Royalty Payments, Including Ones Made to Fauci | Newsmax.com 5-15-22

Three top NIH officials getting fat royalty payments from the hundreds of millions of dollars in royalties were:

Agency officials receiving royalties include:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), whose 2021 taxpayer-funded salary was $456,028. He received 23 royalty payments.

Dr. Francis Collins, the agency's head from 2009 to 2021, whose 2021 taxpayer-funded salary was $203,500. He received 14 royalty payments.

Dr. H. Clifford Lane, Fauci's deputy at the NIAID, whose 2021 taxpayer-funded salary was $325,287. He received eight payments.
The above-mentioned payments include the times a third party paid an official, but the actual dollar amount per transaction has since been deleted or redacted.

Andrzejewski wrote:

"1. NIH defied the federal Freedom of Information Act law and refused to even acknowledge our open records request for the royalty payments. We filed our FOIA last September.
2. NIH used expensive taxpayer-funded litigation to slow-walk royalty disclosures (releasing the oldest royalties first). Although the agency admits to holding 3,000 pages, it will take ten months to produce them (300 pages per month). With Judicial Watch as our lawyers, we sued NIH in federal court last October.
3. NIH is heavily redacting key information on the royalty payments. For example, the agency erased 1. the payment amount, and, 2. who paid it! This makes the court-mandated production virtually worthless, despite our use of the latest forensic auditing tools.

"NIH is essentially telling you, the taxpayer, to pay up and shut up. They'll run things. They have forgotten that they work on behalf of the American people," Andrzejewski said.

On Wednesday, Rep. John Moolenar, R-Mich., asked Acting NIH Director Lawrence Tabak, during an appropriations committee hearing if there was a "conflict of interest" regarding the NIH and its agencies receiving royalty payments and if the public could trust the institution. Tabak admitted that NIH royalty payments have the "appearance" of a conflict of interest.
 
Back
Top