Why did no court rule on the clear evidence of Dominion voting machine corruption immediately after the 2020 election?

[mark francis]

Probably because investigations into voting machine fraud take forever for courts to render judgments, like this one case that has been in court for six years without a verdict.


Yearslong legal battle over Georgia’s voting machines finally reaches decisive moment (msn.com) 2-1-24

Yearslong legal battle over Georgia’s voting machines finally reaches decisive moment​

A federal judge will decide on Thursday if Georgia’s highly disputed Dominion voting machines are in violation of voters’ constitutional rights and are vulnerable to hacking, ahead of the swing state’s March 12 presidential primary.

The heavily debated case has been in court for six years as state officials hashed out whether the machines were secure. In 2022, Alex Halderman, a computer science professor from the University of Michigan, conducted an audit that found nine vulnerabilities in the system’s software, sparking concern for experts and state secretaries in other states using voting machines.

 

[pjmret]

Probably because investigations into voting machine fraud take forever for courts to render judgments, like this one case that has been in court for six years without a verdict.


Yearslong legal battle over Georgia’s voting machines finally reaches decisive moment (msn.com) 2-1-24

Yearslong legal battle over Georgia’s voting machines finally reaches decisive moment​

A federal judge will decide on Thursday if Georgia’s highly disputed Dominion voting machines are in violation of voters’ constitutional rights and are vulnerable to hacking, ahead of the swing state’s March 12 presidential primary.

The heavily debated case has been in court for six years as state officials hashed out whether the machines were secure. In 2022, Alex Halderman, a computer science professor from the University of Michigan, conducted an audit that found nine vulnerabilities in the system’s software, sparking concern for experts and state secretaries in other states using voting machines.

because it wasn't credible evidence of fraud. duh.
god you're a legal *****. lol

 

[mark francis]

because it wasn't credible evidence of fraud. duh.
god you're a legal *****. lol

You claim the evidence was not credible just like thousands of Democrats have been claiming for years and yet the case remains unresolved, making your claims nothing but pre-judged, non-court approved, biased opinions.

 

[pjmret]

You claim the evidence was not credible just like thousands of Democrats have been claiming for years and yet the case remains unresolved, making your claims nothing but pre-judged, non-court approved, biased opinions.

Apparently it wasn't credible which is why you morons keep losing

 

[mark francis]

Apparently it wasn't credible which is why you morons keep losing

Why do you claim the evidence wasn't credible while it has been in court for years without any such declaration from the judge who is handling the case?

 

[pjmret]

Why do you claim the evidence wasn't credible while it has been in court for years without any such declaration from the judge who is handling the case?

Because people whose job it us to assess if evidence is credible have ruled it isn't duh

 

[mark francis]

Because people whose job it us to assess if evidence is credible have ruled it isn't duh

Wait for the court to rule on the credibility of the evidence, no matter how many years it may take, before ruling yourself.

 

[Boris Norris]

Probably because investigations into voting machine fraud take forever for courts to render judgments, like this one case that has been in court for six years without a verdict.


Yearslong legal battle over Georgia’s voting machines finally reaches decisive moment (msn.com) 2-1-24

Yearslong legal battle over Georgia’s voting machines finally reaches decisive moment​

A federal judge will decide on Thursday if Georgia’s highly disputed Dominion voting machines are in violation of voters’ constitutional rights and are vulnerable to hacking, ahead of the swing state’s March 12 presidential primary.

The heavily debated case has been in court for six years as state officials hashed out whether the machines were secure. In 2022, Alex Halderman, a computer science professor from the University of Michigan, conducted an audit that found nine vulnerabilities in the system’s software, sparking concern for experts and state secretaries in other states using voting machines.

They did and Murdoch coughed up 750 million.

There was no evidence found that machines definately switched votes. None. It's a witch hunt

 

[Tripoli]

Probably because investigations into voting machine fraud take forever for courts to render judgments, like this one case that has been in court for six years without a verdict.


Yearslong legal battle over Georgia’s voting machines finally reaches decisive moment (msn.com) 2-1-24

Yearslong legal battle over Georgia’s voting machines finally reaches decisive moment​

A federal judge will decide on Thursday if Georgia’s highly disputed Dominion voting machines are in violation of voters’ constitutional rights and are vulnerable to hacking, ahead of the swing state’s March 12 presidential primary.

The heavily debated case has been in court for six years as state officials hashed out whether the machines were secure. In 2022, Alex Halderman, a computer science professor from the University of Michigan, conducted an audit that found nine vulnerabilities in the system’s software, sparking concern for experts and state secretaries in other states using voting machines.

Because the courts are run by the deep state

 

[pjmret]

Wait for the court to rule on the credibility of the evidence, no matter how many years it may take, before ruling yourself.

3 years and counting. lol. and zero rulings in your favor.

hahahahahah

 

[pjmret]

Because the courts are run by the deep state

even republican appointed judges? lol.

the "deep state" stupidity is your go to excuse for being losers.

 

[Tripoli]

even republican appointed judges? lol.

the "deep state" stupidity is your go to excuse for being losers.

Yup, all judges are deep state in the USA one party system. JFK ordered all advisors out of Vietnam and he was dead the next day, and Johnson rescinded JFK's order. Just how it is, Trump told the military not to attack and they canceled him. But Trump has every file on JFK and the covid realities too

 

[pjmret]

Yup, all judges are deep state in the USA one party system. JFK ordered all advisors out of Vietnam and he was dead the next day, and Johnson rescinded JFK's order. Just how it is, Trump told the military not to attack and they canceled him. But Trump has every file on JFK and the covid realities too

they all are? you can prove it? lol of course not.
you don't prove anything, you just flap your big mouth. lol

how badly did your mom drop you on the head when you were born?

 

[Tripoli]

they all are? you can prove it? lol of course not.
you don't prove anything, you just flap your big mouth. lol

how badly did your mom drop you on the head when you were born?

Jurors are not allowed to have a dictionary, nor do they get paid. So all jurors are uneducated slaves who were not paid nor were they allowed dictionaries that they might learn from. North Korea is more fair than this shithole

 

[pjmret]

Jurors are not allowed to have a dictionary, nor do they get paid. So all jurors are uneducated slaves who were not paid nor were they allowed dictionaries that they might learn from. North Korea is more fair that this shithole

wow, nice vague word salad with zero intellectual content.
its so you