All sex between consenting adults should be legalized.

[Boris Norris]

How do you reconcile the term "60 cases" with the fact that there were "0 responsible investigations of corruptible voting machines in 2020?"

I don't have to. The fact 60 cases were presented to judges, including those appointed by Trump, found no reason for the cases to continue. That means no fraud dickhead.
The voting machines issue was solved when fox were fined 750 million for spreading blatant lies and you sucked it up. You're a loser all round.
Pump up the tyres in your wheel chair and toddler off. Your diaper is wet.

 

[Stray Bullet]

What I said was not racist but this is racist:

View attachment 12490

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

“White Skin Is Sub-Human”: Black Lives Matter Co-Founder Ignites Storm of Rage With “Racist” Remarks (msn.com) 10-14-23

“White Skin Is Sub-Human”: Black Lives Matter Co-Founder Ignites Storm of Rage With “Racist” Remarks

You think I look up to LBJ? Lol

 

[mark francis]

I don't have to. The fact 60 cases were presented to judges, including those appointed by Trump, found no reason for the cases to continue. That means no fraud dickhead.
The voting machines issue was solved when fox were fined 750 million for spreading blatant lies and you sucked it up. You're a loser all round.
Pump up the tyres in your wheel chair and toddler off. Your diaper is wet.

60 cases went to judges and not a one of them was able to get any info on the number of fake ballots that were cast by Democrat/Dominion/Soros voting machines.

 

[Boris Norris]

60 cases went to judges and not a one of them was able to get any info on the number of fake ballots that were cast by Democrat/Dominion/Soros voting machines.

They never asked for them nor was that an issue with the submissions. They were worthless and had no evidence to support their claim. It was all bluster and bullshyt and you're still belching the same like lava. Grow up.

 

[mark francis]

They never asked for them nor was that an issue with the submissions. They were worthless and had no evidence to support their claim. It was all bluster and bullshyt and you're still belching the same like lava. Grow up.

So, you say 60 judges never asked for evidence that the voting machines had not been seriously corrupted. So how did the courts know the machines did not submit thousands of fake ballots for Biden?

 

[Boris Norris]

So, you say 60 judges never asked for evidence that the voting machines had not been seriously corrupted.

That's correct. They read the submission presented to them and rightly assume that is the best evidence available. Furthermore, because the machines were proven to not be corrupted,contrary to the bullshyt you spread and fox being fined, that would only make it worse for Trump. You dont think real deep.

So how did the courts know the machines did not submit thousands of fake ballots for Biden?

They were tested by GOP Hawks. How did you know they did submit votes for Biden? You don't. You fabricated that to suit you pathetic revenge.
The time is up in the fraud bullshyt. Surely you're not not demented enough to suggest it was all rigged. Look at the charges against Trump. The j6 rioters, fake electors. Come on man. You've been conned. Get a grip on yourself.

 

[mark francis]

That's correct. They read the submission presented to them and rightly assume that is the best evidence available. Furthermore, because the machines were proven to not be corrupted,contrary to the bullshyt you spread and fox being fined, that would only make it worse for Trump. You dont think real deep.

So the judges looked over what they were presented and decided there was insufficient data to rule conclusively on the evidence of fraud.

They were tested by GOP Hawks. How did you know they did submit votes for Biden? You don't. You fabricated that to suit you pathetic revenge.
The time is up in the fraud bullshyt. Surely you're not not demented enough to suggest it was all rigged. Look at the charges against Trump. The j6 rioters, fake electors. Come on man. You've been conned. Get a grip on yourself.

Democrats can claim they might not have benefitted from the fraud, but they cannot claim the election was not tainted by the fraud that nobody knows who benefitted from.

 

[pjmret]

So the judges looked over what they were presented and decided there was insufficient data to rule conclusively on the evidence of fraud.

Democrats can claim they might not have benefitted from the fraud, but they cannot claim the election was not tainted by the fraud that nobody knows who benefitted from.

right wing blather.
who benefited from the fraud in 2016? from every electtion? lol.

all you have is whining

 

[mark francis]

right wing blather.
who benefited from the fraud in 2016? from every electtion? lol.

all you have is whining

Nobody benefits from fraud and all Americans suffer when officials cover up fraud and obstruct fraud investigations.

 

[Tripoli]

I don't have to. The fact 60 cases were presented to judges, including those appointed by Trump, found no reason for the cases to continue. That means no fraud dickhead.
The voting machines issue was solved when fox were fined 750 million for spreading blatant lies and you sucked it up. You're a loser all round.
Pump up the tyres in your wheel chair and toddler off. Your diaper is wet.

You may now continue having sex with corpses

 

[pjmret]

Nobody benefits from fraud and all Americans suffer when officials cover up fraud and obstruct fraud investigations.

more vague blather. lol

 

[Boris Norris]

So the judges looked over what they were presented and decided there was insufficient data to rule conclusively on the evidence of fraud.

That's correct. There was no fraud.

Democrats can claim they might not have benefitted from the fraud, but they cannot claim the election was not tainted by the fraud that nobody knows who benefitted from.

Democrats have claimed nothing just the result. You keep banging in with garbage. Knock yourself out son. You lost ..

 

[mark francis]

That's correct. There was no fraud.

You are being vague. Did the courts say they found no evidence of fraud or that they found evidence to show there had been no fraud? Do you understand the difference?

Democrats have claimed nothing just the result. You keep banging in with garbage. Knock yourself out son. You lost .

Democrats who claim courts found evidence that proved no significant fraud occurred in 2020 are lying.

 

[pjmret]

You are being vague. Did the courts say they found no evidence of fraud or that they found evidence to show there had been no fraud? Do you understand the difference?

Democrats who claim courts found evidence that proved no significant fraud occurred in 2020 are lying.

you keep saying that stupidity. lol.
you morons found no credible evidence of fraud.
you were morons then, and you are morons now

 

[mark francis]

you keep saying that stupidity. lol.
you morons found no credible evidence of fraud.
you were morons then, and you are morons now

Finding no evidence of fraud could be because investigators were incompetent. But that is not what Democrats need. What Democrats need is evidence from investigations they blocked that could have supported their contention that no significant fraud occurred.