All sex between consenting adults should be legalized.

Finding no evidence of fraud could be because investigators were incompetent. But that is not what Democrats need. What Democrats need is evidence from investigations they blocked that could have supported their contention that no significant fraud occurred.

no, democrats dont need anything.
what YOU need is credible evidence of fraud to support your claims.
and you morons have failed for 3 years..and running. lol
 
Werbung:
no, democrats dont need anything.
what YOU need is credible evidence of fraud to support your claims.
and you morons have failed for 3 years..and running. lol
Democrats don't need "no damn evidence" to prove voting machines were not corrupted as long as Americans don't take them to task for refusing to allow forensics experts to examine the machines to determine whether the machines were corrupted or not.
 
Democrats don't need "no damn evidence" to prove voting machines were not corrupted as long as Americans don't take them to task for refusing to allow forensics experts to examine the machines to determine whether the machines were corrupted or not.

intelligent people aren't blaming democrats for claimed fraud that there is no evidence of.
morons who still believe there was fraud after 3 years with no evidence aren't going to believe democrats anyway.
there is no value to wasting time and money pandering to morons.
 
intelligent people aren't blaming democrats for claimed fraud that there is no evidence of.
morons who still believe there was fraud after 3 years with no evidence aren't going to believe democrats anyway.
there is no value to wasting time and money pandering to morons.
Claiming there is no evidence of fraud while obstructing investigations into whether there was significant fraud or not is dishonestly and deliberately deceptive.
 
Claiming there is no evidence of fraud while obstructing investigations into whether there was significant fraud or not is dishonestly and deliberately deceptive.
well there is no credible evidence of fraud or you would have been able to convince a judge.
republicans did investigations and found nothing.
you whiners are so stupid. lol
 
well there is no credible evidence of fraud or you would have been able to convince a judge.
republicans did investigations and found nothing.
you whiners are so stupid. lol
For dummies: If investigations of voting fraud are obstructed the evidence from those investigations will not be uncovered. For every one of the thousands of voting machines Democrats refused to allow investigators to examine, the investigators found no evidence because there was no investigation.
 
For dummies: If investigations of voting fraud are obstructed the evidence from those investigations will not be uncovered. For every one of the thousands of voting machines Democrats refused to allow investigators to examine, the investigators found no evidence because there was no investigation.
investigations weren't obstructed. what did republicans find in arizona and michigan for example? nothing lol.

who obstructed which investigations. be speciifc, legal moron
if you had credible evidence judges could order the machines to be made available.

all you have is whining, blather, and lies. lol
 
investigations weren't obstructed. what did republicans find in arizona and michigan for example? nothing lol.

who obstructed which investigations. be speciifc, legal moron
if you had credible evidence judges could order the machines to be made available.

all you have is whining, blather, and lies. lol
Lefties lie when they claim Democrats allowed Republican examiners to examine the Dominion voting machines and that the Republicans claimed their Democrat-aided and supported investigations turned up evidence that the voting machines they examined had not been corrupted.
 
Lefties lie when they claim Democrats allowed Republican examiners to examine the Dominion voting machines and that the Republicans claimed their Democrat-aided and supported investigations turned up evidence that the voting machines they examined had not been corrupted.
name the legitimate investigations that democrats obstructed.
but you wont because you are a liar.
 
name the legitimate investigations that democrats obstructed.
but you wont because you are a liar.
That is not what is mentioned for your benefit, and you should know that. What I specifically said for your benefit was that no Republican investigation of Democrat controlled voting machines had been conducted with Democrat blessing and that no reputable Republican investigators who examined Dominion voting machines have ever reported that they found evidence showing the machines had not been tampered with in 2020.
 
That is not what is mentioned for your benefit, and you should know that. What I specifically said for your benefit was that no Republican investigation of Democrat controlled voting machines had been conducted with Democrat blessing and that no reputable Republican investigators who examined Dominion voting machines have ever reported that they found evidence showing the machines had not been tampered with in 2020.

so you constantly whine that democrats obstructed investigations, but can't name any.
you're just a right wing moron liar. lol
 
so you constantly whine that democrats obstructed investigations, but can't name any.
you're just a right wing moron liar. lol
The problem is not that I cannot name a single investigation that did not occur but that you cannot point to a single investigation of a single Democrat controlled and protected Soros-connected Dominion voting machine that was examined by reliable experts and found to have not been corrupted in the 2020m election.
 
The problem is not that I cannot name a single investigation that did not occur but that you cannot point to a single investigation of a single Democrat controlled and protected Soros-connected Dominion voting machine that was examined by reliable experts and found to have not been corrupted in the 2020m election.
i have no need to point to anything..except the 60 court cases you morons lost.

you constantly claim about democrat obstructed investigations yet when asked to back up the claims from your big mouth, you can't. lol.

you're just a right wing liar :)
 
Werbung:
They already do that in Gaza as several women were raped alive and dead the cut up , these are the people democrats want to protect
name democrats who want to "protect" hamas, and state how they want to do that?

as opposed to the palestinian people, which is a different group than hamas.
 
Back
Top